I have always done it with two separate SAN certificates. The reason for not 
using a single name SSL certificate is that if you are deploying Outlook 2007 
with Outlook Anywhere, then you will also need to deal with 
Autodiscover.example.com .
There is also the concern about the internal Exchange 2007 server name being in 
a public facing SSL certificate. While I personally don't find it an issue (if 
someone can use that information then you have much bigger problems to worry 
about) the clients and their security people are.

If you are only publishing OWA only, then a single name SSL should be fine.

Simon.


--
Simon Butler
MVP: Exchange, MCSE
Sembee Ltd.

e: si...@sembee.co.uk
w: http://www.sembee.co.uk/
w: http://www.amset.info/
w: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/

Need cheap certificates for Exchange, compatible with Windows Mobile 5.0?
http://CertificatesForExchange.com/<http://certificatesforexchange.com/> for 
certificates from just $23.99.
Need a domain for your certificate? 
http://DomainsForExchange.net/<http://domainsforexchange.net/>

Exchange Resources: http://exbpa.com/



From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:joe.poched...@fivesgroup.com]
Sent: 27 May 2010 19:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: GoDaddy SSL Cert for Exch 2007

Funny, two GoDaddy SSL cert questions in the same day...

I need to pick up a new cert for my Exchange 2007 box.  However, in front of 
Exch I'm also running TMG (previously ISA Server) to handle the FBA for OWA 
clients and pass Activesync through to our single Exchange server...

The question I have is this:  Do I pick up a single SAN cert and apply that to 
both the Exchange box and the TMG box (export the private key after completing 
the request and copy the whole thing to TMG)...  Or, do I pick up a SAN cert 
for the Exch box and a separate standard cert (with the external name only) for 
the TMG box?

I just want to make sure I'm picking up the right certs with the TMG in the mix.

Thanks.

Joe P

Reply via email to