Why not patch sendmail ?
"Brien Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:277188@exchangelist...
We are using sendmail as our front end server to an E2k server. It seems
someone has found a hole in our sendmail server & are able to spam us. I
received 4300 e-mails over the weekend. My que
And attempted to give free fishing lessons.
http://us.spamassassin.org/
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
Yes, Tom posted the link for free.
-Original
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
It's free. Apparently the site is experiencing problems. If it doesn't
respond by the eod, email me di
Check this out.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamassassin/
Jeremiah
> Thank you.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:34 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Spam Quest
ues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
is this free? If not around how much is it
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
LOL <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&a
http://www.lib.de.us/help/howdoi.shtml
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
I tried that already. Page can't be found.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Me
Yes, Tom posted the link for free.
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
is this free? If not around how much is it
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier
is this free? If not around how much is it
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
LOL
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&
I tried that already. Page can't be found.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
LOL
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
LOL
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=spamassassin>
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
do you have a link to this
---
do you have a link to this
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Spam Question
Spam assassin.
Disclaimer: Antispam software will block or mark a small percentage of
legitimate
Spam assassin.
Disclaimer: Antispam software will block or mark a small percentage of
legitimate mail.
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 5:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Spam Question
We are using sendmail as our fr
outgoing or incoming.
David White
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question
Depends on what your firewall does. Many can act as a store and forward
device. In this set
m: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:13 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: spam question
>
> I understand the issue, and yes relaying can be handled at the firewall.
> What I was questioning was the idea of
Title: RE: spam question
I understand the issue, and yes relaying can be handled at the firewall. What I was questioning was the idea of filtering spam (or house, whatever) at the firewall. I had not heard of a firewall examining headers, subjects and bodies for spam type information
Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: spam question
>
> Content. SMTP header info. It would be imperfect as all spam filters
> are.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:54 AM
sk). I dislike
these weasels the most.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:54 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: spam question
>
> I have never heard of filtering spam at the
read
message to the internet just as if the message came in through your own
Domain?
John Majetic
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question
I wouldn't think so,
Title: RE: spam question
I have never heard of filtering spam at the firewall. How
could a firewall possibly do that? Unless of course you know who the culprit
senders are, but that changes continuously.
Depends on
whether your firewall is also your mail server. That's
Title: RE: spam question
Content. SMTP header info. It would be
imperfect as all spam filters are.
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:54
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam
question
I have
Title: RE: spam question
I have never heard of filtering spam at the firewall. How could a firewall possibly do that? Unless of course you know who the culprit senders are, but that changes continuously.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday
Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:36 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: spam question
>
> It's also a waste of resources as the mail still has to travel through the
> firewall, into the IMC, get routed to dev null. Better to block them at
> the
> firewall (if pos
re also remarkable for their apparent
> disinclination to do so. --Douglas Adams
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:03 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subj
Not all messaging servers are RFC compliant. Those Sendmail boxes are easy
to configure to not return NDR's.
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question
An
Title: RE: spam question
Doesn't that violate RFCs? :P
-- DrewVisit
http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!Human beings, who are almost
unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also
remarkable for their app
Title: RE: spam question
Depends on what you are running. With my system, I drop mail that is spam, not return it. In such a case, they do not get an NDR, because I am deleting their mail. This is a great tool against relay freaks. They think their relay is getting through, when in truth, I
ssage-
From: Anthony Getor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question
In Outlook 2000, this option is set by going to Tools-->Options-->E-mail
Options-->Tracking Options.
Tony
-Original Message-
*
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. --Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE
If the spammer requests a read receipt AND the user responds, then yes, they get a
receipt. if not, then NO.
Thanks!
Joe Irvine
The Business Office, Inc.
< http://www.tbopayroll.com>
609-597-1155
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, F
RE: spam question
OutL2000 never asked about sending read receipts, but OutL2002 does.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question
I wouldn't think
If they are using an app that knows how to leverage Outlook's object model,
it is *possible* they could see such.
Read receipts are a client function though. Not exchange, nor any spam
software I've seen.
-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
OutL2000 never asked about sending read receipts, but OutL2002 does.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question
I wouldn't think so, unless the spammer
Not necessarily. If they have that option set and it's something that works via
internet mail, then... maybe.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
The opposite of bravery is not cowardice, but conformity. -- Robert Anthony,
American psych
I wouldn't think so, unless the spammers are coming from your own Exchange
Server. All I know is that whenever someone from the outside world requests
a read receipt, I'm usually asked if I want to send it or not. Of course,
that is with Outlook (Internet Mail Only) and Outlook Express at home.
It sounds like the perp used an Email address generator program.
-Original Message-
From: James Gosnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Spam question
Dear all, more of a curiosity question than an outright prob
Dear all,
Please ignore this message, just realised the spammer got the addresses
from our website. Doh!
Cheers, James.
> Dear all, more of a curiosity question than an outright problem, we
> received a big spam mail last night, most of you have probably seen it,
> it's the one where the pre
36 matches
Mail list logo
