procedures, this will
eventually happen again.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Using OSTs for backup
Your budget shouldn't be for outage situations. It should be for ba
ilure versus be able to see email from before last
synchronisation.
William
-Original Message-
From: Karl Burbage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Using OSTs for backup
Thanks for the opinions. It is not until
Thanks for the opinions. It is not until a real happens crash that one
can realy appreciate the effect it will have. It curtainly focuses the
mind. When a crash occurs, 2 things happen. One cannot use mail, and one
might lose email history.
Essentialy, I had to go through Q272570: How to reco
Subject: RE: Using OSTs for backup
As a backup to the backup in an emergency it *may* be helpful. BUT
Exchange just isn't mailbox data. And if this is the first server in
the site and we are talking Exchange2000, you don't want to know how
much Kevin is going to charge you to fix yo
As a backup to the backup in an emergency it *may* be helpful. BUT
Exchange just isn't mailbox data. And if this is the first server in
the site and we are talking Exchange2000, you don't want to know how
much Kevin is going to charge you to fix your restore.
-Original Message-
From: K
How about backups instead?
-Original Message-
From: Karl Burbage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Using OSTs for backup
We have a modest Exch 5.5 server with around 3.2GB of IS data and 40 odd
users. We've had a syst
Possible, yes... Recommended, no.
In the event of a total system failure such as you describe, you would only
be able to recover mailbox contents. No public folders, no distribution
lists, no directory information (smtp addresses, etc.)
Procedure might run something like this...
Bring up clien