Your phone doesn't sync deletes???
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 5:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures
That doesn't help my phone.
-Original Message
What exactly is the boss wanting to do?
Before I took my present position, the previous person bought DisclaimIt.
There is a 2010 version. And it works quite well on 2003.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone using CodeTwo's Exchange Rules
Signatures mostly, but the desire to embed graphics in HTML-formatted ones
is high on the list of requirements, so vanilla transport rules are out.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
What exactly is the boss wanting to do?
Before I took my present
We've been using it for a couple years now. Easy to setup and maintain and
just works.
Roger Wright
___
ELECTILE DYSFUNCTION: the inability to become excited over any of the
choices for President put forth by either party in the 2012 election year
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Richard
-software.com
Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures
Signatures mostly, but the desire to embed graphics in HTML-formatted ones is
high on the list of requirements, so vanilla transport rules are out.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Link
jonathan.l...@gmail.commailto:jonathan.l
+1
opinion on
Neatsy cutesy signatures bad on internal email, unforgivable on external.
opinion off
From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures
Don't know
: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures
Don't know, maybe its just Symantec some sigs with fancy bits get caught
here as unscannable and get the message tossed.
/.02¥ worth
Blackberry
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 03:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange
Dancing banana and Under Construction
Blackberry
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 07:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures
Oh, you spoilsport
Everybody needs a mail store full of half-meg emails with 50 bytes of actual
message in them
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 6:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures
Oh
@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures
Oh, you spoilsport.
Don't you think those fancy .sigs with the moving graphics embedded in
them are the bees knees?
Next you'll be saying you didn't like the hamster dance web site, back
in the '90s, or lolcats/cheezburger nowadays.
Meanie
I don't see them anymore. I wrote a couple of rules that delete them.
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures
I should write an EWS
Mailbox or transport?
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures
I don't see them anymore. I wrote a couple
Mailbox.
I wouldn't presume to make the assumption for my other mailbox users. :-P
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 8:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures
Mailbox
That doesn't help my phone.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures
Mailbox.
I wouldn't presume to make
It's a server-side rule. I don't see why it wouldn't help your phone...
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 8:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures
That doesn't help my
, 2012 2:15 PM
*To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Disclaimers and Signatures
** **
Don't know, maybe its just Symantec some sigs with fancy bits get caught
here as unscannable and get the message tossed.
/.02¥ worth
Blackberry
*From*: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich
Still use them. Exchange 2010 makes it fairly easy. They are required in my
enviroment (legal).
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Melahn den...@advancedav.com
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 9:48:34 AM
Subject:
Honestly I've yet to encounter a single techie who thinks they do anything
worthwhile, it always comes down to our lawyers said we should.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:den...@advancedav.com]
Sent: 03 November 2010 13:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Disclaimers
Still as meaningless and UN-necessary as ever!
Unfortunately yes, many still do it.
~JasonG
** DISCLAIMER **
If there is any other disclaimer or legal notice in this posting, it
is hereby declared NULL and VOID; you may safely ignore that content.
This disclaimer supersedes all other
You are kidding, right? This list is lousy with them and other
signature bloat.
On Wednesday, November 3, 2010, Dennis Melahn den...@advancedav.com wrote:
These were all the rage 5 years ago but I see them less and less these days.
Still a necessary evil? Anyone still using them?
Thanks,
We still have them on our gateway box.
John
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:den...@advancedav.com]
Sent: 03 November 2010 13:49
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Disclaimers
These were all the rage 5 years ago but I see them less and less these
days. Still a
Does the same go for logon warnings? We still find ourselves obliged to
put these in place so that users can't claim they didn't know we'd be spying
on them, but I'm not sure there is actually any legal precedent for it.
On 3 November 2010 13:53, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote:
The great thing about disclaimers for 2007 and 2010 is that you can use 1
disclaimer for internal emails and 1 for external emails.
Since I run the IT department here, the IT staff runs a disclaimer
for internal emails that talks about how and when to contact tech support.
The external email
They are a great big-old-load of bobbins
--
Regards,
James.
http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand
Vigesimal, and J others...?
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
I'd say a better method (of covering yourself) would be having it as part of
the employee/personnell handbook and having them sign of as having
read/received the handbook.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:57 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does the same go for logon warnings? We still
: disclaimers
5.5
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July
11, 2002 10:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: disclaimers
5.5 or 2000?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross
Title: Message
5.5 or
2000?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 11 July 2002 15:28To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: disclaimers
strange
question
my vp asked me
this, and I told him it wasnt possible..
please assure me
Title: Message
With
3rd party software, yes.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael
Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:28
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
disclaimers
strange
question
my vp asked me
this, and I told him it
Title: Message
First
you'd have to be able to identify it as spam, and if you could accurately do
that, why not just delete it?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:28
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
Title: Message
5.5
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July
11, 2002 10:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: disclaimers
5.5
or 2000?
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto
Title: Message
Probably something like MailSweeper then.
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 11 July 2002 15:37To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
disclaimers
5.5
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
31 matches
Mail list logo
