You generally need to use 587 "Client" connector instead of the 25 "Default"
connector. Have you tried that?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Rick Berry [mailto:rbe...@elevativenetworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:49 AM
To
Issues
Subject: RE: oracle/sql app relay through 2010 receive connector
You generally need to use 587 "Client" connector instead of the 25 "Default"
connector. Have you tried that?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchang
2011 12:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: oracle/sql app relay through 2010 receive connector
I built a new '25' connector explicitly for this ... not sure I can get them to
recode to talk to 587, but I'll throw that option on the trial-and-error pile.
Fr
lto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 12:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: oracle/sql app relay through 2010 receive connector
Oh! That's different.
Did you give it relay permissions after you created it? (That would require a
PowerShell cmd.)
Regards,
M
o: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: oracle/sql app relay through 2010 receive connector
Yep, I issued the get-receiveconnector "my connector name" | Add-ADpermission
-user blah blah blah -extendedrights "MS-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Any-Recipient"
If that's what you mean.
Did
Have you tried a command line telnet to the connector from the SQL server?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: oracle/sql app relay through 2010 receive connector
Well, then I guess I'd
