Why can't your hosting company just queue the email instead of having it
sit in a mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: testing for failure
Not quite sure if this is OT
12, 2002 2:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Why can't your hosting company just queue the email instead of having it
sit in a mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:08 AM
To: MS
Correct me if I am wrong, but if your firewall is down, then your ISP can no
longer forward the email to your exchange server?
So wouldn't their server just try to deliver it every so often until their
delivery timeout expired?
I have had my server down from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM one day for
-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Correct me if I am wrong, but if your firewall is down, then your ISP can no
longer forward the email to your exchange server?
So wouldn't
power
outage while the power company upgraded our electric service and it worked
great.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Why can't your hosting company
Some ISP's charge for that service, or at least for setup.
-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Correct me if I am wrong, but if your firewall
-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
UUNet does this for me and it works fine. They maintain our zone file on
their DNS server and there are two entries, one for my mail server and one
Some of the ISP's charge extra. I know ATT did, and I think Sprint
would've charged extra too.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
UUNet does this for me
, 2002 3:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Some of the ISP's charge extra. I know ATT did, and I think Sprint
would've charged extra too.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:16 PM
To: MS
Byte me.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Just talked to UUNet - they will do it for free.
Suckers.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN
Sounds AB Approved.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Just talked to UUNet - they will do it for free.
Suckers.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Byte me.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Just
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Sounds AB Approved.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: testing for failure
Just talked to UUNet - they will do
for them.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: testing for failure
Some ISP's charge for that service, or at least for setup.
-Original Message-
From
14 matches
Mail list logo
