B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003
l Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones
support wildcard certs, it&#
;>>
>>> Michael B. Smith
>>> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>>> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM
th [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
It's not recommended because it doesn't work on some phones. If all our phones
support wildcard certs, it's just fine.
I've
with a wild card but it is not very
pretty, and not recommended..
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM
>>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>>> Subject: Re: tran
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
>
> OK!
>
> That's g
al Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
OK!
That's good to know. We'll be switching from E2k3 to E2010 in the near
future. Kinda sucks that our ex
rrectly. You can kind of make it work with a wild card but it is not very
> pretty, and not recommended..
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:52 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: transit
ame mismatch if you try and
visit a site that uses our existing wildcard.
From: Kurt Buff [kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 August 2011 3:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
So, why go with a SAN cert instead of
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just price, or is
there a technical advantage?
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings wrote:
>
> Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single S
oftware.com] On Behalf Of Sobey,
Richard A
Sent: 05 August 2011 15:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: transition from exchange 2003 to 2010
You'll need new certs on the 2010 CAS as that's where your clients will be
connecting once you've transition your namespace.
On
So, why go with a SAN cert instead of a wildcard cert? Is it just
price, or is there a technical advantage?
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 07:45, Paul Hutchings wrote:
>
> Just done this, fun aint it J We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com,
> mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.do
Just done this, fun aint it :) We got a single SAN/UCC cert for domain.com,
mail.domain.com, legacy.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com.
We put it on the CAS and the 2003 FE, not the 2003 BE (and of course our
reverse proxy for SSL inspection).
This is what I have in my notes for KB937031:
You'll need new certs on the 2010 CAS as that's where your clients will be
connecting once you've transition your namespace.
On my SAN certs I put server.fqdn, autodiscover.fqdn and the name of our OWA
namespace.
Cheers,
Richard
From: bounce-9390019-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto
14 matches
Mail list logo
