E2k3, but I don't think it matters much.
I've been trying to keep security groups and DLs segregated by OU and
naming convention, but see that many of my DLs have been automagically
converted to security groups.
I believe this is because they've been used to apply permissions on
things like PFs
Yes, futile is a good word... quick google got this:
http://blog.joeware.net/2009/10/12/1759/
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Stupid Exchange question
E2k3, but I don't
[mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Stupid Exchange question
E2k3, but I don't think it matters much.
I've been trying to keep security groups and DLs segregated by OU and
naming convention, but see that many of my DLs have been
