On 2013-09-26 at 19:11 -0700, Todd Lyons wrote:
> I was notified offlist that someone was having problems with the
> latest released clamav-0.98. I am running clamav 0.98 on my server as
> well, watching to see if there are any issues that pop up. Thus far,
> nothing to report.
Did they explicitl
On 2013-09-27 at 13:33 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> We maybe should discover if anyone actually wants the GUI monitor in its
> current form. If not maybe we should just kill it...
Might be worth looking to see whether or not the core Exim integration
could be provided by invoking Exim in a
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1057
--- Comment #18 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz 2013-09-27 14:42:16
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Some variable that would show which spamd server processed message
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1057
--- Comment #17 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz 2013-09-27 14:29:53
---
Some variable that would show which spamd server processed message would also
be nice, so it w
Sorry that line should have been edited out -- it is the cast of pointer
to integer that worries me
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
On 2013-09-27 13:44 , john ffitch wrote:
> ../exim_monitor/em_main.c:576:5: warning: ‘XKeycodeToKeysym’ is
> deprecated (declared at /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h:1695)
> [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
You mean it's the NSA backdoor? ;-)
I think you don't have to worry. It's a tool that uses the X11
On 27/09/13 13:33, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
We maybe should discover if anyone actually wants the GUI monitor in its
current form. If not maybe we should just kill it...
I still use it occasionally, even though the interface is cludgey.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://li
jpff wrote:
Sorry that line should have been edited out -- it is the cast of pointer
to integer that worries me
[Cc line trimmed - can we use either exim-users or exim-dev but not both
- I've set this to exim-dev]
That cast ought to be fixed. I suspect its code that has not been
touched in
On 27/09/13 12:44, john ffitch wrote:
On a Debian machine with X86_64 processors (3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP
Debian 3.2.46-1 x86_64 GNU/Linux)
I think this has been around for a while but it does indicate something
wrong.
gcc exim_monitor/em_TextPop.c
../exim_monitor/em_TextPop.c: In function â€
On a Debian machine with X86_64 processors (3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP
Debian 3.2.46-1 x86_64 GNU/Linux)
I think this has been around for a while but it does indicate something
wrong.
gcc exim_monitor/em_TextPop.c
../exim_monitor/em_TextPop.c: In function âDoSearchâ:
../exim_monitor/em_TextPop
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have uploaded Exim 4.82 RC1 to
> ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/
>
> It has been over a year since a regular a release. The number of
In the email announcing intention to release,
11 matches
Mail list logo
