Re: [exim-dev] Git unknotting

Nigel Metheringham (Do 07 Apr 2016 14:38:58 CEST): > Github won't let you push --force unless you unprotect the branch first... > > OK, both repos have the right version now, and the sync process between > them is working again. It could have been much worse - if there had > been a subsequent se

[exim-dev] [Bug 1812] Minor fixes and clarification of DANE support

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org --- Comment #2 from Git Commit --- G

[exim-dev] [Bug 1800] exim -bhc fake session and cutthrough delivery

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1800 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 1807] regression - extract inside map

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 1812] Minor fixes and clarification of DANE support

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|p...@exim.org|jgh146...@wizmail.org Hardware|x86

[exim-dev] [Bug 1812] Minor fixes and clarification of DANE support

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa --- Created attachment 877 --> https://bugs.exim.org/attachment.cgi?id=877&action=edit indicate that dane does not work with gnutls -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

[exim-dev] [Bug 1812] New: Minor fixes and clarification of DANE support

https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812 Bug ID: 1812 Summary: Minor fixes and clarification of DANE support Product: Exim Version: 4.87 Hardware: x86 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: bug Priority

Re: [exim-dev] Git unknotting

Github won't let you push --force unless you unprotect the branch first... OK, both repos have the right version now, and the sync process between them is working again. It could have been much worse - if there had been a subsequent series of changes pushed to different sides it would have been f

Re: [exim-dev] Git unknotting

Hi, Nigel Metheringham (Do 07 Apr 2016 12:55:04 CEST): > Hi, > > I've just had to unknot git a little bit - the HEAD commit on the github > and hummus respositories were different versions of the same commit. > > I presume that Heiko had amended a commit that was previously pushed to > one of t

[exim-dev] Git unknotting

Hi, I've just had to unknot git a little bit - the HEAD commit on the github and hummus respositories were different versions of the same commit. I presume that Heiko had amended a commit that was previously pushed to one of the repos, and the periodic process that syncs the two repos could not d