Phil Pennock (Di 13 Feb 2018 00:08:50 CET):
> On 2018-02-09 at 15:32 +, Vsevolod Stakhov via Exim-dev wrote:
> > It seems that FreeBSD is no longer considered in CVE early disclosure,
> > isn't it?
>
> There has been no change from Exim's side in how this was communicated.
> We have an exim-m
On 2018-02-09 at 15:32 +, Vsevolod Stakhov via Exim-dev wrote:
> It seems that FreeBSD is no longer considered in CVE early disclosure,
> isn't it?
There has been no change from Exim's side in how this was communicated.
We have an exim-maintainers mailing-list which has vetted people from
any
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239
Git Commit changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@exim.org
--- Comment #4 from Git Commit ---
G
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239
--- Comment #3 from Gedalya ---
Yes. The documentation could be read as suggesting the flag is stored with the
message, not with a recipient address item.
Coming to think of it, it would fit better in many configurations if this was
settable in the SMTP
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2239
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Harris ---
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2235
Heiko Schlittermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
On 09.02.2018 09:40, ad...@bugs.exim.org wrote:
> https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2235
>
> Bug ID: 2235
>Summary: CVE-2018-6789
>Product: Exim
>Version: 4.90
> Hardware: All
> OS: All
> Status: NEW
>
