https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2844
Heiko Schlittermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@schlittermann.de
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2844
Bug ID: 2844
Summary: ${perl} expansion can change global state
Product: Exim
Version: 4.95
Hardware: x86
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: bug
Priority:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2843
Bug ID: 2843
Summary: wishlist for method to correctly create valid headers
like SomeHeader:${format_header: .}
Product: Exim
Version: 4.95
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
--- Comment #2 from Tomáš Šimek ---
I have to accept, that from perspective of developer is it a wishlist and low
priority, that is twice true if software is opensource :)
But please look from perspective of user, which use mostly distribution
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris ---
>From the documentation:
RFC 3028 requires the use of CRLF to terminate a line. The rationale was that
CRLF is universally used in network protocols to mark the end of the line. This
implementation does not embed
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Exim 4.96 |Indeterminate
Priority|medium
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
Bug ID: 2842
Summary: Improper handling CRLF in filter files, makes Syntax
error
Product: Exim
Version: N/A
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2822
--- Comment #12 from Ferry ---
Hi,
seems GnuTLS will make some changes in an upcoming release.
https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1077#note_756103636
Not sure what that should mean for Exim however. The code might need to
consider what GnuTLS