https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138
--- Comment #8 from Jeremy Harris ---
Fast queue ramp is now supported by default.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http:
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2922
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2980
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris ---
I'm not sure why you'd want to have no selector option as a usable
function? Using "-i" in combination with a selector would not be affected
by the proposed change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2890
--- Comment #3 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz ---
It's not a bounce but regular message, just autogenerated, using autoreply exim
driver functionality.
Standards AFAIK say nothing about sender for such message. So your claim seems
wrong.
And preventing loop
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452
Jeremy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unalloca...@exim.org|jgh146...@wizmail.org
Resolution|---
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2980
--- Comment #2 from Douglas Phillips ---
-i by itself is useful in processing the output from another command which was
piped in (for example exim -bp) or if one needed to purge the entire queue
(e.g., if a PHP had been abused or there was a runaway proc
