t; Heiko Schlittermann <mailto:h...@schlittermann.de>
> 24 November 2016 at 22:44
>
> How should I understand this? Replies to bug report mails (originated
> from bugzilla) do not go into bugzilla anymore?
>
> (If I understood Jeremy right, the Spam came via form submissions,
removed the trust between the exim-dev list and bugzilla.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
from 'ad...@bugs.exim.org' to=20
> 'ni...@exim.org': Can't send data
> Traceback:
>
> at Bugzilla/Mailer.pm line 174.
> Bugzilla::Mailer::MessageToMTA(...) called at Bugzilla/BugMail.pm line 354
> Bugzilla::BugMail::sendMail(...) called at Bugzilla/BugMail.pm
ps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357417
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
been fun to sort out.
Nigel.
> Heiko Schlittermann <mailto:h...@schlittermann.de>
> 7 April 2016 at 12:03
> Hi,
>
> Nigel Metheringham (Do 07 Apr 2016 12:55:04 CEST):
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just had to unknot git a little bit - the HEAD commit on the
(Perl uses the resolver library linked
into Exim and Perl's Socket6::getaddrinfo() returned different results
in -be and -bh mode.)
The difference between them was whether 0 or FALSE was used in the
changed line.
Cheers
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham ---
the end or at least a good stop
point.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1551
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1550
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Would like to know if anyone uses BRIGHTMAIL with exim - the current
support is 10 years old, but not heard of any use of it...
Nigel.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1465
--- Comment #7 from Nigel Metheringham 2014-04-15 13:48:25 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I identified what triggers this behavior / workaround.
>
&g
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1465
--- Comment #5 from Nigel Metheringham 2014-04-15 13:19:19 ---
As shown in your own ServerFault thread this is a configuration issue and not a
problem with exim
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1465
--- Comment #2 from Nigel Metheringham 2014-04-14 16:26:50 ---
This sounds like it is a configuration issue.
Can you check that your configuration is using
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1420
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
a production server
just because you cannot be bothered to get the policy right is a
bit silly.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1408
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1409
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1408
--- Comment #1 from Nigel Metheringham 2013-10-31 11:36:08 ---
Taken from #1409 by John Horne:-
Exim 4.82 enables the 'smtp_confirmation' logging
We maybe should discover if anyone actually wants the GUI monitor in its
current form. If not maybe we should just kill it...
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
##
t told you quite clearly
that you were trying to relay through a host for which you did not have
relay permissions. It quite correctly refused to take the mail. That
seems more than entirely reasonable.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353
Summary: Automated checks for unsorted option lists
Product: Exim
Version: N/A
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
gh we prune
the online versions into an old directory every so often anyhow... so
maybe this doesn't need doing.
Hopefully that makes things simpler rather than more complex (OK, the
scripting needs fixing, but it needs fixing now).
Comments?
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringh
Looks like we stopped updating when we changed how the html was
generated. The release scripting does generate the PDFs, but does not
move a copy onto the website.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible
nic in progress).
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
o that pretty quickly if someone prods me about it - I'm
currently in the maddest 4 weeks of my year, so can't do right now, and
very likely to forget promises made at present.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1318
Summary: Filter documentation had not had version updated
Product: Exim
Version: 4.80.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version:
Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2012-10-26 at 22:17 +0100, Exim Git Commits Mailing List wrote:
>> Author: Nigel Metheringham
>
>> Changed version comparison to be string based
>
> Deoh! Sorry. :(
>
> I loath every part of Perl's version numbering and c
is just seriously masochistic
(manipulating XML at all is pretty masochistic), so they need to stay.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/
ml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/1.71.1/xhtml/docbook.xsl
>
>
> Any clues, anyone?
>
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
> GitHub?
We have cron jobs operating on the tahini git repo already - so adding
(bidrectional?) sync to those would be pretty easy.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1196
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
- probably set to
0.00).
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1031
--- Comment #16 from Nigel Metheringham 2012-06-06 16:00:56
---
If we are looking at audit logging then it needs to run post transport, so we
know that the
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1031
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
will see a bug update in a moment to link these emails into it...
its just easier to send it to the mailing list, but needs to be attached
to the bug too.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technol
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
; writeable to writable.
>
> cu andreas
>
>
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
Phil Pennock wrote:
> Am really coming around to the idea of making the next release be 4.80
> instead of 4.78, to highlight that there are issues to watch for here.
There do seem to be a number of changes that cause upgrade issues,
so probably a good idea.
Nigel.
--
[
branch back to us or fork on github - see http://wiki.exim.org/EximGit
Nigel.
David Saez Padros wrote:
> Hi
>
> would be great to have dsn support in exim, having this patch:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/eximdsn
>
> applied to the
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1237
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
-your-user-name-email-and-github-token/
Cheers
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
detai
about the idea of trying to grab a complete option
list from the source code and comparing it to that in the documentation,
but thats another ramble]
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangib
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212
--- Comment #8 from Nigel Metheringham 2012-02-23 20:17:06 ---
My take on this...
The patch as supplied is unnecessarily specific. The handling of
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1169
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1103
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=949
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=925
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=806
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
machines, but
the reduced throughput on the list in recent years makes this less
of an issue.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham -- ni...@dotdot.it ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at https
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1142
--- Comment #6 from Nigel Metheringham 2011-09-03 11:32:58 ---
How about changing this so that there is an option to continue accepting a
message after
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1101
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 24 Mar 2011, at 07:06, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> Should we also just memset() the plaintext buffer to fill it with \0
> content at the point that TLS is started, always? After all, even
> without a data-past-TLS, a pipelined NOOP command with attack-code as
> its parameter, immediately follow
Wiki down. That rather defeats the object of it being a wiki, though.
I don't think Moin has that capability.
We can use TextCha mechanisms though if someone has an appropriate set
of questions and answers we can use. http://moinmo.in/TextCha
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Methering
nded workflow for this sort of thing.
I like being able to just grab stuff from another tree, but need to keep
attribution straight.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
to
leave that battle for another day.
> I've wondered about the cam.ac.uk ownership claim but decided it wasn't
> important enough to me to make an issue out of it, since it's all
> released as GPL anyway and I have no interest in helping someone else
> re-licence t
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1006
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=943
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=943
--- Comment #2 from Nigel Metheringham 2011-02-06 19:00:50 ---
Agree that fix looks like a cut and paste job when a minor tweak on the initial
parse would be
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1026
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1064
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1044
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1075
Summary: Revisit configuration default logging - eg incoming port
Product: Exim
Version: 4.74
Platform: Other
OS/Ver
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1073
--- Comment #3 from Nigel Metheringham 2011-01-26 11:29:22 ---
For accuracy, RHEL 4.7 actually has pcre-4.5-4.el4_6.6
The first report typoed the version number
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1073
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1073
Summary: Exim fails to build with older PCRE versions
Product: Exim
Version: 4.74
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1051
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1052
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=974
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1002
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
any freeze is
requested (!) after that...
However would anyone else on the dev team like to suggest an alternative
approach?
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy -
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=931
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
et or
a bug report then it doesn't exist.
The release is security related, not your request.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
## List details at http:
n't happen for this release.
Because you didn't ask for this until after the RC was issued, and
there is no bugzilla entry for it... so you are asking for changes
to be made at the last minute on a security related release.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.
Please report any issues to the exim-dev list. A release will
hopefully follow shortly depending on how this RC goes.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
## List details
On 23 Dec 2010, at 10:27, Phil Pennock wrote:
> Has anyone run the full test suite and ensured there are no regressions?
It does need doing, but I have never got it to work on my platform.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments
.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
- we should now be set for 4.73
and the change bars should be correct...
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman
n't added back into the
mix as yet (because our HTML build toolchain has completely changed
with the work that Mike did for the website... and the toolchain
lives in a different git repo).
You'll see that there is a tag for an 4.73 RC0 because I needed a
tag to test against.
Why not have another command line option that is like a macro but can
only take 1/0 values, and may be set when non-prived?
Or is this too specific a hammer for this screw?
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are
ely to be very hard.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191
--- Comment #6 from Nigel Metheringham 2010-11-04 19:04:59 ---
As I understand it a Barracuda only behaves like this if a non-recommended
option is set.
The
On 28 Sep 2010, at 12:11, Michael Haardt wrote:
> Nigel: Any opinions on that?
I'm not technical competent to comment on either the DKIM or the storage
code.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own
.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
Nigel Metheringham changed:
What|Removed |Added
yling at present doesn't handle
multiple levels. So currently if we hack the styling we will be
most of the way there
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
I've modded the referencing style for the indexes. Not sure if I
entirely like it (too much repeated text), but its there for
comment...
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/p
ust the indexes).
I'm not well up on the xslt magic that Mike implemented to transform
the doc set so it may have to wait.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
C side block fall back to being just a link if
there is no javascript
- maybe index tidying
- section navigation within chapters (which helps the indexes too)
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham nigel.methering...@intechnology.com ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own an
1 - 100 of 433 matches
Mail list logo
