[exim-dev] [Bug 1590] outbound SOCKS proxy support

2015-03-26 Thread Jeremy Harris
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1590 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Target

[exim-dev] [Bug 1590] outbound SOCKS proxy support

2015-03-15 Thread Git Commit
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1590 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added

[exim-dev] [Bug 1590] outbound SOCKS proxy support

2015-03-13 Thread Jeremy Harris
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1590 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added Attachme

Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 1590] outbound SOCKS proxy support

2015-03-12 Thread Jeremy Harris
On 12/03/15 22:14, matthew.schlos...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: > Is this feature working well enough for us to take it for a test run and > provide feedback? I think so; though it's only been run using a single hacked-on testcase. Feedback would be very welcome. -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## Lis

Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 1590] outbound SOCKS proxy support

2015-03-12 Thread matthew.schlosser
Is this feature working well enough for us to take it for a test run and provide feedback? Matthew Schlosser On 3/12/15, 5:04 PM, "Jeremy Harris" wrote: >--- You are receiving this mail because: --- >You are on the CC list for the bug. > >http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1590 >

[exim-dev] [Bug 1590] outbound SOCKS proxy support

2015-03-12 Thread Jeremy Harris
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1590 Jeremy Harris changed: What|Removed |Added

[exim-dev] [Bug 1590] outbound SOCKS proxy support

2015-02-22 Thread Phil Pennock
--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1590 --- Comment #1 from Phil Pennock 2015-02-23 01:01:35 --- Authentication is going to be necessary for any of the real-world scenarios where I'd have wanted this f