[exim-dev] [Bug 2659] Documentation for -m option: with Solaris 2.4 documentation online, it is exact. Not apparent

2021-05-18 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2659 Git Commit changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@exim.org Status|RESOLVED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2659] Documentation for -m option: with Solaris 2.4 documentation online, it is exact. Not apparent

2021-05-18 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2659 Heiko Schlittermann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[exim-dev] [Bug 2659] Documentation for -m option: with Solaris 2.4 documentation online, it is exact. Not apparent

2021-05-18 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2659 Nigel Metheringham changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[exim-dev] [Bug 2659] Documentation for -m option: with Solaris 2.4 documentation online, it is exact. Not apparent

2021-05-17 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2659 Heiko Schlittermann changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unalloca...@exim.org|h...@schlittermann.de CC|

[exim-dev] [Bug 2659] Documentation for -m option: with Solaris 2.4 documentation online, it is exact. Not apparent

2020-10-14 Thread admin--- via Exim-dev
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2659 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris --- I'm not caring all that much about changing references to an OS from sixteen years ago, personally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.e