Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-20 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-05-20 at 18:24 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > FWIW I have just uploaded to Debian/experimental to check for > build-errors. In a first try we are building with -Wformat=security > and > -extern BOOLstring_format(uschar *, int, const char *, ...) > PRINTF_FUNCTION(3,4); > +extern BOO

Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2012-05-19 Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2012-05-19 at 16:26 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > If you're going to build with -Werror=format-security then you need to > #define PRINTF_FUNCTION(A,B) to /**/ in mytypes.h, which will also shut > up a bunch of other warnings. The PRINTF_FUNCTION() u

Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-19 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-05-19 at 16:26 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2012-05-18 Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2012-05-18 Phil Pennock wrote: > > > I have uploaded Exim 4.80 RC1 to: > [...] > > > I get a strange error when building with -Werror=format-security: Right, because we're using a format check for

Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-19 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2012-05-18 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2012-05-18 Phil Pennock wrote: > > I have uploaded Exim 4.80 RC1 to: [...] > I get a strange error when building with -Werror=format-security: > - > gcc -o em_main.o -c -g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > -Wfor

Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-18 Thread Jeremy Harris
On 2012-05-18 21:08, Phil Pennock wrote: I blinked because I thought I caught all of those, but now I see that although you wrote GnuTLS, you mean OpenSSL. You'd think I'd have learned which is which by now! -- Jeremy -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim

Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-18 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-05-18 at 20:23 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 2012-05-18 04:55, Phil Pennock wrote: > [4.80 RC1 announcement] > > I'm getting a bunch of testsuite GnuTLS expected-log output differences > which look to be due to use of a newer certificate. Example: I blinked because I thought I caught

Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-18 Thread Jeremy Harris
On 2012-05-18 04:55, Phil Pennock wrote: [4.80 RC1 announcement] I'm getting a bunch of testsuite GnuTLS expected-log output differences which look to be due to use of a newer certificate. Example: OpenSSL/2100 TLS client: TLS setup fails - retry in clear ===f test-mainlog-munged w

Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2012-05-18 Phil Pennock wrote: > I have uploaded Exim 4.80 RC1 to: > ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/ > This release contains a number of backwards-incompatible changes, for > both OpenSSL and GnuTLS, in the name of security (about the only reason > we normally accept for being ba

[exim-dev] Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded

2012-05-17 Thread Phil Pennock
I have uploaded Exim 4.80 RC1 to: ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/ This release contains a number of backwards-incompatible changes, for both OpenSSL and GnuTLS, in the name of security (about the only reason we normally accept for being backwards incompatible). Please read over RE