Greg A. Woods wrote:
> No, not really -- you've resorted to outside influences to explain half
> your claims, so they're bogus from the start.
FFS dude, read the rest of the mail. I listed 3 other mail servers that would
do it without any outside help. You are not discussing the point of any of
th
Hi,
upgrading from 4.51 to 4.52 and adding domainkeys support leads to
(seldom) segfaults:
http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=563
On RHEL4/x86_64 the segfaults look like
segfault at 00552acc8000 rip 002a9697cee9 rsp 007fbffbdfd8 error 6
on FC3/x86_64 like
segfault at 0055
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 07:37:20PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
> >
> > Instead of using a file with the appropriate alias files, I figured it
> > would be easier to use .forward files, so users can change it if they
> > need to. However, when the filter
Oliver Egginger wrote:
>> While you're revising the docs, should we possibly add a size limit
>> on the example spam = conditions?
>>
>
> Example:
>
> deny condition = ${if <{$message_size}{300k}{1}{0}}
> spam = spamcheck:true
>
>
> - oliver
I know how to do it, my point was for Philip f
Change the report that spamassasin return
/etc/spamassasin/local.cf
i use:
clear_report_template
report _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ tests=_TESTSSCORES(,)_
Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
Is there a way to add the old X-Spam-Status header with Exim/Exiscan? It
used to look like:
X-Spam-Status: No, hit
Is there a way to add the old X-Spam-Status header with Exim/Exiscan? It
used to look like:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,IMPRONONCABLE_1
autolearn=no version=2.63
I am using Exim 4.52 with near defaults for the exiscan acl header
ad
> While you're revising the docs, should we possibly add a size limit on
> the example spam = conditions?
>
Example:
deny condition = ${if <{$message_size}{300k}{1}{0}}
spam = spamcheck:true
- oliver
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim detail
Philip,
While you're revising the docs, should we possibly add a size limit on
the example spam = conditions?
I ran into a problem with large security reports from my FreeBSD boxes
getting timed out on spamd, because they
Were huge.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.or
On 10/07/05, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to extract the first character of a string (i'm using exim 4.50)
>
> I have see the definition of extract, and it requires a seperator...I
> have tried leaving it blank -
> ${extract{1}{}{abcdefg}}
>
> But I still get "abcd