Outlook 2000/2002/2003
Open the message in the message list. Select View from the menu bar. Select
Options from the View Menu. The Full Header is listed at the bottom under
Internet headers:
Thanks.
Here is my header:
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: fr
On 11/20/05 4:07 PM, "Markus Braun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please send the full bounce message with all headers as well as relevant
>> lines from Exim's log file.
>
>
> I cant find where i can see the full header view in outlook xp:
Try this:
Outlook 2000/2002/2003
Open the message in t
Also check that the DNS address resolves the same. I have DNS resolve with
different addresses depending on the request address (internal, DMZ and
external).
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fred Viles
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:
On 21 Nov 2005 at 17:47, Rob Brenart wrote about
"Re: [exim] smarthost relay problems":
|...
| Ah crap... if I log onto my outside box, I can telnet oculardata.com 587
| and it does just as yours does above... but if I do it from a box
| (windows or linux) from inside my house, I get nothing
Rob Brenart wrote:
So..
*SNIP*
Ah crap... if I log onto my outside box, I can telnet oculardata.com 587
and it does just as yours does above...
Well that *was* a cut 'n paste from the actual connect to your Exim box.
Should be the same... ;-)
(From a data center in Hong Kong, even...)
So..
First, you need to determine if SBC have port 587 SSL/TLS_on_connect,
or STARTTLS.
Easy enuf to do...
If Thunderbird is working with the 'Outbound Server' set to 'TLS is
available' it should be STARTTLS.
If it had to be set to 'TLS Only' the SBC box should be
SSL/TLS_on_connect
Yo
Rob Brenart wrote:
Fred Viles wrote:
(good advice, snipped now)
What do you know, my hosting provider has a 2 second preconfigured thing
for just this problem... so now, exim is running a copy on 587 as
well... I don't mean to be a hassle, but I'm not seeing how to redirect
my client to
Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:04:23 -0600, "Roberto Salvatierra"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
deny!hosts = natsp-43-netra20.ice.co.cr
dnslists = relays.visi.com:bl.spamcop.net:relays.ordb.org:sbl-xbl.spa
message = host is listed in $dnslist_domain
Blocking on spa
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Bill Hacker wrote:
>
> Upstream connectivity providers that block port 25 often *cannot* open it.
>
> The law of the land (federal/national) in some jurisdictions, requires
> subscribers to
> send only over the ISP's facilities. One neck on the block when
> tracking down abuse
Upstream connectivity providers that block port 25 often *cannot* open
it.
The law of the land (federal/national) in some jurisdictions, requires
subscribers to
send only over the ISP's facilities. One neck on the block when
tracking down abuse.
In such places, or in general, upgrading to
Rob Brenart wrote:
Fred Viles wrote:
On 21 Nov 2005 at 16:06, Rob Brenart wrote about
"Re: [exim] smarthost relay problems":
| Fred Viles wrote:
| >
| > What machine is this exim running on? Is it connected to the | >
Internet by an ISP that blocks outbound port 25?
| >
| > | It's on
Fred Viles wrote:
On 21 Nov 2005 at 16:06, Rob Brenart wrote about
"Re: [exim] smarthost relay problems":
| Fred Viles wrote:
| >
| > What machine is this exim running on? Is it connected to the
| > Internet by an ISP that blocks outbound port 25?
| >
| >
| It's on my local server sitt
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:04:23 -0600, "Roberto Salvatierra"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> deny!hosts = natsp-43-netra20.ice.co.cr
> dnslists = relays.visi.com:bl.spamcop.net:relays.ordb.org:sbl-xbl.spa
> message = host is listed in $dnslist_domain
Blocking on spamcop is a idea
Fred Viles wrote:
On 21 Nov 2005 at 16:06, Rob Brenart wrote about
"Re: [exim] smarthost relay problems":
| Fred Viles wrote:
| >
| > What machine is this exim running on? Is it connected to the
| > Internet by an ISP that blocks outbound port 25?
| >
| >
| It's on my local server sitt
Marc Sherman wrote:
Bill Hacker wrote:
There is a simpler way to annotate it, but this should cover it all:
=
[snip misleading information]
Bill, the OP is trying to use Exim as the SMTP _client_, connecting to a
smarthost server via tls_on_conne
On 21 Nov 2005 at 16:06, Rob Brenart wrote about
"Re: [exim] smarthost relay problems":
| Fred Viles wrote:
| >
| > What machine is this exim running on? Is it connected to the
| > Internet by an ISP that blocks outbound port 25?
| >
| >
| It's on my local server sitting under my desk...
Rob Brenart wrote:
It's on my local server sitting under my desk... connected through SBC
DSL.. I didn't think port 25 was blocked, but I could be wrong
Ah, yes, that's the fundamental bit I was missing -- I thought you were
trying to submit to your ISP's smarthost, not a machine of your ow
Rob Brenart wrote:
There is a simpler way to annotate it, but this should cover it all:
=
local_interfaces = :
# Defaults to all if not mentioned.
daemon_smtp_ports = 25 : : : :
465 :
# defaults to 25 if not mentioned
tls_on_connect_port
Fred Viles wrote:
What machine is this exim running on? Is it connected to the
Internet by an ISP that blocks outbound port 25?
It's on my local server sitting under my desk... connected through SBC
DSL.. I didn't think port 25 was blocked, but I could be wrong
--
## List details at ht
mail.oculardata.com is running exim, and it is listening on port 25
(whence STARTTLS is available, which exim supports as a client). It
is also listening on port 465, requiring tls-on-connect (which exim
doesn't support as a client). It is *not* listening on the standard
MSA port (587). Sh
On 21 Nov 2005 at 12:59, Rob Brenart wrote about
"Re: [exim] smarthost relay problems":
|...
| Thanks for the advice... it is a debian list, so I've asked on the exim4
| debian user's list and we'll see if I get any hits... in case it matters
| though, I tried your command and received the f
Rob Brenart wrote:
Well, by using a simple telnet hostname portnumber... I get no response
on 25 or 587... but 465 works fine
Then you're going to have to use stunnel or the like if you want to have
Exim submit mail to the smarthost.
- Marc
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailma
Marc Sherman wrote:
Rob Brenart wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this help sounds like help for
listeners, and my trouble is in sending mail to a smarthost, not
receiving from... the smarthost I'm sending to is what it is, I can't
make any changes there... and the reason SSL & TSL came up
Rob Brenart wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this help sounds like help for listeners,
and my trouble is in sending mail to a smarthost, not receiving from...
the smarthost I'm sending to is what it is, I can't make any changes
there... and the reason SSL & TSL came up is because in my thu
Bill Hacker wrote:
There is a simpler way to annotate it, but this should cover it all:
=
[snip misleading information]
Bill, the OP is trying to use Exim as the SMTP _client_, connecting to a
smarthost server via tls_on_connect on port 465. Tellin
There is a simpler way to annotate it, but this should cover it all:
=
local_interfaces = :
# Defaults to all if not mentioned.
daemon_smtp_ports = 25 : : : :
465 :
# defaults to 25 if not mentioned
tls_on_connect_ports = 465 : (( thos
Rob Brenart wrote:
Bill Hacker wrote:
Marc Sherman wrote:
Rob Brenart wrote:
Thanks for the advice... it is a debian list, so I've asked on the
exim4 debian user's list and we'll see if I get any hits... in case
it matters though, I tried your command and received the
following... but
Marc Sherman wrote:
That's referring to standard TLS, which is served on port 25 (or 567 for
message submission),
Whoops. s/567/587/
- Marc
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list
Rob Brenart wrote:
exim4 as TLS/SSL client
--
Both exim4-daemon-heavy and exim4-daemon-light support TLS/SSL using the
GnuTLS library and exim will use TLS *automatically* as client if the
server exim connects to offers it. You can stop reading now if you are
not setting up a mailserver whic
Mike Jones Wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ...SNIP...
>
> The mail server is behind a pix firewall, with port 25 open, however
> I've
> not opened the pop port.
>
> ...SNIP...
>
>
If you are planing on using SMTP Authentication you will need to
disable the Fix-up for SMTP on the PIX. It will corrup
Marc Sherman wrote:
Bill Hacker wrote:
AFAIK Exim supports tls_on_connect on any port you specify. RTFM.
I'd love for you to show me where in TFM it says that Exim supports
tls_on_connect as a _client_. One would expect a tls_on_connect
option on the SMTP transport; chapter 30 (which I ha
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Rob Brenart wrote:
> >
> >
> I did RTFM and it claimed it would all "just work", it doesn't... and I
> can't seem to find an entry about how to make it try port 465 instead of 25
>
>
http://exim.org/exim-html-4.50/doc/html/FAQ_2.html#TOC120
Q0206: How can I get Exim to deli
Bill Hacker wrote:
AFAIK Exim supports tls_on_connect on any port you specify. RTFM.
I'd love for you to show me where in TFM it says that Exim supports
tls_on_connect as a _client_. One would expect a tls_on_connect option
on the SMTP transport; chapter 30 (which I have read, have you?) m
Bill Hacker wrote:
Marc Sherman wrote:
Rob Brenart wrote:
Thanks for the advice... it is a debian list, so I've asked on the
exim4 debian user's list and we'll see if I get any hits... in case
it matters though, I tried your command and received the
following... but no message delivered.
Marc Sherman wrote:
Rob Brenart wrote:
Thanks for the advice... it is a debian list, so I've asked on the
exim4 debian user's list and we'll see if I get any hits... in case it
matters though, I tried your command and received the following... but
no message delivered. However, I think I s
Dave Lugo wrote:
(sending to the list)
Well, you're expecting a mailserver to behave like a end-user mailclient,
and while there is a some overlap there, they aren't the same thing.
That's what I mean about the square peg... all I want is for a couple
programs to be able to send out mail...
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Rob Brenart wrote:
> >
> > Is the information at stunnel.org insufficient? (last time
> > I looked, the online info was pretty helpful)
> >
> >
> My problem is just how little I know about exim4, I'm having trouble
> with the different documents... I haven't found what I need
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Rob Brenart wrote:
> >
> That doesn't sound fun at all... do you know of any howtos or manuals on
> making that all work?
>
Is the information at stunnel.org insufficient? (last time
I looked, the online info was pretty helpful)
--
-
Marc Sherman wrote:
Rob Brenart wrote:
Thanks for the advice... it is a debian list, so I've asked on the
exim4 debian user's list and we'll see if I get any hits... in case
it matters though, I tried your command and received the following...
but no message delivered. However, I think I see
Rob Brenart wrote:
Thanks for the advice... it is a debian list, so I've asked on the exim4
debian user's list and we'll see if I get any hits... in case it matters
though, I tried your command and received the following... but no
message delivered. However, I think I see the problem, :25...
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Rob Brenart wrote:
2005-11-17 11:01:45 1Ecn8r-0004rC-JE <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=rob P=local
S=323
2005-11-17 11:01:45 1EeF4R-0007Bz-Nt ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=smarthost
T=remote_\
smtp_smarthost: retry time not reached for any host after a long failure
period
Your sm
Hello People!
Well, i've beem bugging you all with some emails about my SpamAssassin
problems. I've beem doing some tests:
First I added the following line in the session ACL at the config file:
warn message = X-Spam-Score $spam_score ($spam_bar)
spam = nobody:true
restarted t
John Jetmore wrote:
I implemented something like this using $tod_epoch w/ the last 3 digits
replaced w/ zeros (modulo operator wasn't implemented when I originally
did this), giving ~16.6 minute granularity, which was about right for what
I was trying to do. As you point out, I also had to t
James Davis wrote:
Nigel Wade wrote:
> After the router which processes the posixGroup has expanded the group
alias to multiple recipients, each of those recipients goes through the
routing process. During the first pass the uid router will decline the
recipient, but it should accept each of
Rob Brenart wrote:
> 2005-11-17 11:01:45 1Ecn8r-0004rC-JE <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=rob P=local
> S=323
> 2005-11-17 11:01:45 1EeF4R-0007Bz-Nt ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=smarthost
> T=remote_\
> smtp_smarthost: retry time not reached for any host after a long failure
> period
Your smarthosted is blocked
Roberto Salvatierra wrote:
> deny!hosts = natsp-43-netra20.ice.co.cr
> dnslists =
> message = host is listed in $dnslist_domain
Should work, I think. Are you sure the clients are connecting from the IP
that natsp-43-netra20.ice.co.cr resolves on your machine?
Would be h
Nigel Wade wrote:
> After the router which processes the posixGroup has expanded the group
>> alias to multiple recipients, each of those recipients goes through the
>> routing process. During the first pass the uid router will decline the
>> recipient, but it should accept each of the expanded
I have a local box which I want to be able to send mail... specifically
I want bugzilla to be able to mail people.
I have no idea how to make it a mail server, or if my ISP would even
allow it, but I have a dedicated server from http://liquidweb.com/ so
I'm pretty sure I can use that as a smar
Thank you Grzegorz
I tried this 2 things:
deny!hosts = natsp-43-netra20.ice.co.cr
condition = ${if
match{${mask:$sender_host_address/32}{200.91.77.43/32}{no}{yes}}
dnslists =
relays.visi.com:bl.spamcop.net:relays.ordb.org:sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
message = hos
Hi !
I'm trying to whitelist an IP that is listed on a RBL ( dnslists ) the IP I'm
trying to allow is a nat IP that is used by
several clients so it's unsafe on one of my RBL servers. the host I'm trying to
whitelist is: natsp-43-netra20.ice.co.cr
I have tried this:
check_recipient:
# Exim
> > You can use this router:
> >
> > copy:
> > driver = redirect
> > senders = [EMAIL PROTECTED];/etc/localdomains
> > data= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > unseen
> > no_verify
>
> OK, the outgoing emails are copy to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> email. But the email does'nt send to the recipi
A few minutes ago, I wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> > I have put a second release candidate for 4.60 in
> >
> > ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/Testing/exim-4.60-RC2.tar.gz
> > ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/Testing/exim-4.60-RC2.tar.gz.sig
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
> I have put a second release candidate for 4.60 in
>
> ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/Testing/exim-4.60-RC2.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/Testing/exim-4.60-RC2.tar.gz.sig
Two bugs have been fixed since RC1, and
We have a small office and we want to collect all sent emails
to an seperate email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). So each user can read
sent emails by reciving [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible? -and how can I establish a permanent
copy-function for sent emails in exim4?
The Outlook CC-Field is not a soluti
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 16:07 +0200, Paulo Andre wrote:
> I have a exim 4.3 server that when it receives a connection from a
> computer outside its IP range the 'greeting' takes about 30s to appear,
> but as soon as I NAT those IP's to an address on the email servers range
> then the 'greeting' ge
Clive McDowell wrote:
> Folks,
>
> are there any known problems with the autoresponder if there are non-english
> characters in the subject header? I've just seen
> the failure -
>
> Expansion of "${if def:h_Subject: {Autoreply: $h_Subject:} {Auto-response}}"
> in uservacation
> transport conta
I have a exim 4.3 server that when it receives a connection from a
computer outside its IP range the 'greeting' takes about 30s to appear,
but as soon as I NAT those IP's to an address on the email servers range
then the 'greeting' gets sent immediately.
Is this standard or have a configured s
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Clive McDowell wrote:
> are there any known problems with the autoresponder if there are
> non-english characters in the subject header? I've just seen the
> failure -
By "non-english" I presume you really mean "non-ASCII", that is
byte values not in the range 32-127 (or tab
James Davis wrote:
Nigel Wade wrote:
If the data is returned to a redirect router, each of the returned
values will be re-routed. All you need is another router which looks up
the mail address from the uid.
That sounds as if it might work, how do I get the second router to
'realise' that th
Christian Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
Markus Braun, 21.11.2005 (d.m.y):
*SNIP*
I have a own debian sarge server with two domains and one IP.
I send it over IMAP Courier.
I don't think so. When sending emails, this is usually done using
smtp.
Courier-IMAP is the exception. It can be op
Mike Jones wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to configuring exim, and I've been asked
to set up our mail server for an external client to use as we will be
hosting their website on our webservers.
Its never been used for users to log into so they can send and receive
email
Markus Braun, 21.11.2005 (d.m.y):
> >> Folgende Empfänger konnten nicht erreicht werden:
> >>
> >> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' am 20.11.2005 22:37
> >>503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA
> I dont find it at the moment :(
Do you know "grep"?
> >Not mail.log, Exim has its own log in
Hello,
Markus Braun, 21.11.2005 (d.m.y):
> >OK, but I still don't know which address you originally sent to and
> >which domain(s) your server handles. Does your mail client submit your
> >mail to your server or some other server, which then tries to contact
> >your server?
>
> I have a own debi
Hello Markus,
Markus Braun, 21.11.2005 (d.m.y):
> I cant find where i can see the full header view in outlook xp:
Then use another software.
> Ihre Nachricht hat einige oder alle Empfänger nicht erreicht.
>
> Betreff:
> Gesendet am: 20.11.2005 22:37
>
> Folgende Empfänger konnte
Mike Jones wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to configuring exim, and I've been asked
to set up our mail server for an external client to use as we will be
hosting their website on our webservers.
Its never been used for users to log into so they can send and receive
emails
Hi all,
I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to configuring exim, and I've been asked
to set up our mail server for an external client to use as we will be
hosting their website on our webservers.
Its never been used for users to log into so they can send and receive
emails. (Basically its just
Daniel Faulknor wrote:
Hi Everyone
I run a web server on which i host a number of domains
Just for examples sake i will use 2 of them
my one for the service is dannz.ath.cx and i have webmaster, daniel,
help etc setup
i have another patrick2005.ath.cx and i want to have a webmaster
account for th
Folks,
are there any known problems with the autoresponder if there are non-english
characters in the subject header? I've just seen
the failure -
Expansion of "${if def:h_Subject: {Autoreply: $h_Subject:} {Auto-response}}" in
uservacation
transport contains non-printing character 207
The actu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 21.11.2005 07:41:06:
> 2005-11-21 07:25:04 End queue run: pid=3968
> 2005-11-21 07:32:52 failed to expand "@ : ${lookup
mysql{VIRTUAL_DOMAINS}} :
> ${lookup mysql{ALIAS_DOMAINS}}" while checking a list: lookup of
> "VIRTUAL_DOMAINS" gave DEFER: MYSQL: query failed:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Marc Sherman wrote:
> I agree, that should be cross referenced from chapter 9; probably in the
> intro, in point 1, where string expansion is first mentioned.
Noted, but this is too late for the 4.60 documentation, unless a more
serious problem arises that causes me to re-ed
70 matches
Mail list logo
