Larry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:11:23AM +0800, Bill Hacker wrote:
I need to figure out how to block the origionator of a message.
*SNIP*
Use originator-specific rules, optionally applied only to
traffic that arrives from mailhop.org.
Thanks you for the lengthy answer. There
Fred Viles wrote:
On 24 Jan 2006 at 7:32, Bill Hacker wrote about
"Re: [exim] is this spam unable to t":
|...
| Short answer: in the HELO section, the earliest the '$sender_host_name'
| could be determined.
No, I don't think that's right. As I read TFM, $sender_host_name is
the name de
Chris wrote:
*SNIP*
thanks, could you specify which part of exim.conf I insert this code to
enable it, our config is configured byt the developer of our control
panel we use and I have only made minor adjustments to it and far from
experienced with exim.
Chris
Chris *thanks for aski
On Monday 23 January 2006 05:16, Chris Lear wrote:
> 1) Is there a cunning bit of exim config to save spamassassin CPU cycles
> on lots of similar mail from the same IP address all at the same time?
> [It makes me wonder whether accepting and dropping would be my best
> option, though I'm not going
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Could I use "env -i start-stop-daemon --start ..."? I only need use
>>> Perl inside Exim with no change in timestamp format...
>>Yes, that should work. Since you're using Debian I suggest filing this
>>as a bug. I'm not sure whether the bug is in Debian's s
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:55:48 +, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Israel Cárdenas Romero wrote:
>> I'm running Exim from a "exim4" Debian package, in a Debian Sarge box.
>> It starts from a "/etc/init.d/exim4" script, that uses:
>>
>> start-stop-daemon --start --pidfil
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Israel Cárdenas Romero wrote:
> I'm running Exim from a "exim4" Debian package, in a Debian Sarge box.
> It starts from a "/etc/init.d/exim4" script, that uses:
>
> start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile /var/run/exim4/exim.pid \
> --exec $DAEMON -- -bd -q${QFLAGS}${QUEUE
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Tomasz Nowak wrote:
>
> It is added by 4.60. Is there any secret version between 4.54 and 4.60
> that I don't know about? ;)
No.
The only thing that might affect you is if you resynchronized your
configuration with configure.default, which now uses control=submission
where ap
Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Tomasz Nowak wrote:
>
> > Did exim developers change sth in exim 4.60
> > with Sender header? I don't see it in
> > http://www.exim.org/ftp/ChangeLogs/ChangeLog-4.60
> > but looks like has shown up.
>
> That only gives the changes sin
I'm running Exim from a "exim4" Debian package, in a Debian Sarge box.
It starts from a "/etc/init.d/exim4" script, that uses:
start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile /var/run/exim4/exim.pid \
--exec $DAEMON -- -bd -q${QFLAGS}${QUEUEINTERVAL} \
${COMMONOPTIONS} ${QUEUERUNNEROPTIONS} ${
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Tomasz Nowak wrote:
> Did exim developers change sth in exim 4.60
> with Sender header? I don't see it in
> http://www.exim.org/ftp/ChangeLogs/ChangeLog-4.60
> but looks like has shown up.
That only gives the changes since 4.54 so perhaps you want to look at an
earlier change
Did exim developers change sth in exim 4.60
with Sender header? I don't see it in
http://www.exim.org/ftp/ChangeLogs/ChangeLog-4.60
but looks like has shown up.
Sender header in default config is IMO useless,
that info is also in envelope-from. Newest
Outlook 11 uses it as To: while replaying.
Pro
Marc Sherman a écrit :
Sam wrote:
But when the dns-reverse-lookup failed, I get an error :
2006-01-21 12:06:52 H=(XXX.XX) [XXX.XX.XXX.XXX] Warning: ACL "warn"
statement skipped: condition test deferred: host lookup deferred for
reverse lookup check
2006-01-21 12:06:54 1F0Ga5-0005zM-Cb <= [EMAI
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Leonid Shulov skrev:
Hi exim-users,
I want use exim for sending mail from local root to local user or via
SMTP mail server.
May be you have examples for this configuration.
The default configuration should handle this well. Is there any
particular problem you'r
Chris Lear wrote:
>
> 1) Is there a cunning bit of exim config to save spamassassin CPU cycles
> on lots of similar mail from the same IP address all at the same time?
> [It makes me wonder whether accepting and dropping would be my best
> option, though I'm not going to do that]
No solution, but
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Matt Sealey wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a summary of such things or a good knowledge of what
> might need configuration file changes or a different behaviour?
exim-4.60/README.UPDATING
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Israel Cárdenas Romero wrote:
> I have a problem calling Perl from Exim.
>
> When a use Perl embedded in Exim, it seems to change the timestamp format
> in "Received:" lines to host locale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). When it occurs, many
> servers (Exchange) reject my messages as SPA
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Kerstin Espey wrote:
>
> # Slow down fast senders
> warn
> ratelimit = 100 / 1h / per_rcpt / strict
> delay = ${eval: $sender_rate - $sender_rate_limit }s
>
> I can't get this working, because $sender_rate is not an integer but something
> like 5.9, which does not work
Hi guys
Our spool is full of undeliverable bounce mail.
We have the parameters
ignore_bounce_errors_after = 2h
timeout_frozen_after=1d
but we have a lot of bounce mail up to 3 days old and only 3 days
because we did a big cleanout on Friday. Here's an example for one 46h
old
# /op
I'm running a fairly small exim/spamassassin operation. It's on one
server, which does some other things as well. So I don't want it
spending all its time on spamassassin.
Exim is rejecting based on some blacklists at RCPT time, then running
the rest through sa (data acl), and rejecting based on s
Kerstin Espey wrote:
Hi,
I have updated to exim 4.60 for the use of the ratelimit condition. Reading
the spec.txt, I found this example:
# Slow down fast senders
warn
ratelimit = 100 / 1h / per_rcpt / strict
delay = ${eval: $sender_rate - $sender_rate_limit }s
I can't get this worki
Hi,
I have updated to exim 4.60 for the use of the ratelimit condition. Reading
the spec.txt, I found this example:
# Slow down fast senders
warn
ratelimit = 100 / 1h / per_rcpt / strict
delay = ${eval: $sender_rate - $sender_rate_limit }s
I can't get this working, because $sender_rate
I have a problem calling Perl from Exim.
When a use Perl embedded in Exim, it seems to change the timestamp format
in "Received:" lines to host locale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). When it occurs, many
servers (Exchange) reject my messages as SPAM...
How could I use Perl and not to change timestamp format
23 matches
Mail list logo
