Le Mardi 24 Janvier 2006 20:11, John Jetmore a écrit :
> use ${expand:
Thank you, it do the job...
--
Erick.B
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 17:38 -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
>The thing here is that you really want the secondary MX to have the user
> list of the primary so that don't end up having the secondary trying to push
> mail through that the primary rejects, and then sending bounces. This ends
> up p
On 1/24/06 1:51 PM, "Michael Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Not having a secondary MX is a really bad idea.
My question is: "Why?"
Nothing wrong with using PostFix, by the way. When we selected Exim as our
escape from sendmail, PostFix didn't yet exist, so we didn't have to choose.
Michael Johnson wrote:
Hi Gang
I really like using Exim, and recommend it in most cases. However,
I've started working at a place where they're using Postfix. They
don't have a secondary mail server, and I'd like to set up Exim as the
secondary. The reasons I have so far are:
1. Not
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:51, Michael Johnson wrote:
> I really like using Exim, and recommend it in most cases. However,
> I've started working at a place where they're using Postfix.
The place I worked at insisted on Sendmail, the reason being historical
popularity. Grr. At least you'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Is there a way to check quota on mailbox at smtp_data time.
Checks: is account over quota (which can be MTA-imposed) and whether
it will be over when writing message.
Yes, but it's quite involved.
Here's the core of a checker;
call it as a sub-acl from both you
Hi Gang
I really like using Exim, and recommend it in most cases. However,
I've started working at a place where they're using Postfix. They
don't have a secondary mail server, and I'd like to set up Exim as
the secondary. The reasons I have so far are:
1. Not having a secondary MX is
>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:01:55 -0200, you wrote:
>Hello!
>Sorry to send another email about the same subject. But my mail server
>crashed so i couldn't see the answers.
>
>I am calling my spamassassin service in SMTP time with some ACL rules in
>my exim4 configuration file. I start the SA service
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:35:07 +, Ronan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:00:44 +0100, Jeremiah Foster
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Is there an easy way to "thaw" 3000 frozen messages? The exim -Mvh
>>>method will take to long.
>>
>> exim -Mvh will show
Le Mardi 24 Janvier 2006 19:36, E.Bullier a écrit :
>{LDAP_SERVER/LDAP_VACATION_MSG_QUERY}}\n\
> Ce message vous est envoye par un robot.\n\
> Il ne vous sera adresse qu'une fois."
> My problem is that the use of the line return (\n) don't run correct
Hello.
In a vacation transport, i use the directive above:
uservacation_transport:
driver = autoreply
subject = "Re: $h_subject"
text= "${lookup ldap \
{LDAP_SERVER/LDAP_VACATION_MSG_QUERY}}\n\
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:10:02 -0200
Eduardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Replies on-list please!
> Tim Jackson wrote:
> > SpamAssassin is very resource-hungry (especially if you have
> > a lot of external rulesets) and if you're handling a lot of mail,
> > it's possible that you may have insufficien
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:01:55 -0200
Eduardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I start the SA service, start exim4 service and i wait only some
> minutes and the server gets overloaded!
[snip]
> I have 216 users in the server, and I have an avarege about 10
> access / minute.
"access" = inbound SMTP m
Hello!
Sorry to send another email about the same subject. But my mail server
crashed so i couldn't see the answers.
I am calling my spamassassin service in SMTP time with some ACL rules in
my exim4 configuration file. I start the SA service, start exim4 service
and i wait only some minutes a
Marc Haber wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:00:44 +0100, Jeremiah Foster
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there an easy way to "thaw" 3000 frozen messages? The exim -Mvh
method will take to long.
exim -Mvh will show you the headers of the message. You must be very
confused.
Your solution is exiqg
Marc Sherman wrote:
Mikisa Richard wrote:
Hi all
Any ideas on how I can force delivery of messages to a particular
domain/server from the queue. exim -qf seems to give me the same
retry-time not reached error still and i really need to push these messages.
-qf is the correct o
Mikisa Richard wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Any ideas on how I can force delivery of messages to a particular
> domain/server from the queue. exim -qf seems to give me the same
> retry-time not reached error still and i really need to push these messages.
>
-qf is the correct option for overriding r
I normally run a exim -qqff
GM.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 3:31 PM
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] force delivery
On Jan 24, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Mikisa Richard wrote:
> Any
On Jan 24, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Mikisa Richard wrote:
Any ideas on how I can force delivery of messages to a particular
domain/server from the queue. exim -qf seems to give me the same
retry-time not reached error still and i really need to push these
messages.
I think:
exim -qff
should
Hi all
Any ideas on how I can force delivery of messages to a particular
domain/server from the queue. exim -qf seems to give me the same
retry-time not reached error still and i really need to push these messages.
--
Richard
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exi
--On 24 January 2006 11:05:30 + Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[Re-reading the message I see I have misunderstood...]
On Tue 24 Jan 2006 10:53:13 GMT , Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
1. Is there a way to check quota on mailbox at smtp_data time.
Yes. This is well
[Re-reading the message I see I have misunderstood...]
On Tue 24 Jan 2006 10:53:13 GMT , Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Is there a way to check quota on mailbox at smtp_data time.
Yes. This is well documented, see:
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.60/doc/html/spec.html/ch26.html#id
Hi
On Tue 24 Jan 2006 10:43:35 GMT , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, it can be old question, but i'd like to check quota at smtp time.
Like it goes in router.
So there are several questions.
1. Is there a way to check quota on mailbox at smtp_data time.
Yes. This is well do
Hi, it can be old question, but i'd like to check quota at smtp time.
Like it goes in router.
So there are several questions.
1. Is there a way to check quota on mailbox at smtp_data time.
Checks: is account over quota (which can be MTA-imposed) and whether
it will be over when writing messag
Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is added by 4.60. Is there any secret version between 4.54 and
> > 4.60 that I don't know about? ;)
>
> No.
>
> The only thing that might affect you is if you resynchronized your
> configuration with configure.default, which now uses
> control=submis
Am Montag, 23. Januar 2006 11:49 schrieb Tony Finch:
> Er, yes, that's probably a documentation bug. Try wrapping $sender_rate
> like this
> ${sg {$sender_rate_limit} {[.].*} {} }
>
Thank you! This one works fine for me:
delay = ${eval: ${sg {$sender_rate} {[.].*} {} } - $sender_rate_limi
Have you tried resetting variables inside the script ?
$ perl -e 'print "1- @ENV{'LANG'}\n" ; @ENV{'LANG'}="C" ; print "2-
@ENV{'LANG'}\n" '
1- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2- C
El mar, 24-01-2006 a las 08:59 +0100, Israel Cárdenas Romero escribió:
> It seems it doesn't work...
> When I write about time
It seems it doesn't work...
When I write about timestamp format, locale, and Perl, I'm refering the
point 46 in ChangeLog:
http://www.exim.org//ftp/ChangeLogs/ChangeLog-4.50
It says:
46. Reset the locale to "C" after calling embedded Perl, in case it was
changed (this can affect the format of da
28 matches
Mail list logo
