Tuesday 28 March 2006 09:31 Martin Hierling wrote:
> my .forward Auotresponder ist generating something like this:
>
> 1FKRGG-0007RY-1n == invalid-to-line <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R=userforward
> T=address_file defer (-1): Mandatory file or directory option missing
> from address_file transport
>
> addr
Hi List,
my .forward Auotresponder ist generating something like this:
1FKRGG-0007RY-1n == invalid-to-line <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R=userforward
T=address_file defer (-1): Mandatory file or directory option missing
from address_file transport
address_file transport is pretty short so what is it miss
Hi again (been a while since my last post & change of addresses),
I've got a problem that I had run in to a while back with Exim, but avoided
it since at the time I was able to use single key lookups. However now I am
trying to implement the same feature, but I have no choice but to use query
sty
"list1" schrieb:
... ...
How can
you make a call to a server that leaves no trace anywhere other than exim
log (below).
It may be that someone was able to break into your server using an
unsafe (PHP) script, but not (yet) able to gain root access - he would
then have to act as user www. But
Quoting daniel:
> control = submission
This should probably be
control = submission/sender_retain
Otherwise, Exim seems to take $authenticated_id and adds the default
domain.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http
On Monday 27 March 2006 15:48, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.60/doc/html/spec.html/ch43.html#SECTsubmodn
>on
>
> You were, in fact, right all along. Have a read of that, and pay
> attention to the bits about tweaking the various retain settings and how
> to set a domain on
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Dionte Wilson wrote:
>
> I was wondering if Exim can be configured to use LDAP for recipient
> lookups?
Yes. You can configure Exim to do arbitrary LDAP lookups as part of it
address routing. See
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.60/doc/html/spec.html/ch09.html#SECTldap
Tony.
-
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Dionte Wilson wrote:
>
> Does Exim implement the CHUNKING and BINARYMIME Smtp service extensions?
No.
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*
Hi All,
I am trying to use NTLM via Cyrus SASL 2.1.19 backed into Windows Server
2003. I have managed to get this working under cyrus imap by adding the
following line into the imapd.conf file
sasl_ntlm_server: adserver.mydomain.com
in the Exim 4.50 specification "36. The cyrus_sasl authenti
Hello,
Jeff Lasman writes:
saving to /dev/null is NOT blocking. It's dropping.
In the context you are speaking, you are correct. In the context I am
speaking, it is blocking it from the user's mail box, but in a way the can
be easily undone or redirected to a collection agency as the FTC
On Monday 27 March 2006 12:55 pm, Mar Matthias Darin wrote:
> By whose defination are you declaring this approach wrong? The
> question was how to block a country, not what your opinion of wrong
> is. This solution, like many others, simply fits the question,
> without politics.
I very seldom f
Hi all.
I was wondering if Exim can be configured to use LDAP for recipient lookups?
It is crucial that I be able to rewrite the addressed based on
information supplied
in the search DN and the output of the LDAP query.
For example:
I want to be able to address a message to "[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all.
Does Exim implement the CHUNKING and BINARYMIME Smtp service extensions?
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
Hello,
Jakob Hirsch writes:
Quoting Mar Matthias Darin:
save /dev/null
sorry, but this turns a wrong idea into a stupid one. If you don't like
mail, be polite enough to reject it at smtp time. Exim's ACLs are
powerful enough to do that.
By whose defination are you declaring this approach
Hi
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 15:30 -0500, daniel wrote:
> My mail client is just Kmail and I'm not sure how to tell if an address is
> unqualified or not. The domain it's sending from exists (in some, but not
> all cases, it's even a domain belonging to the mail server in question)
>
> I don't hav
>>I'm having an issue with one person (of course it's the CEO) - he's
>>using Outlook 2000 as his MUA, and somtimes he has mail that looks
>>like it delivers, but in our mainlog there's no entry, the reject log
has:
>>
>>2006-03-23 15:47:12 SMTP call from (copper) [172.16.128.181] dropped:
>>too
Hi, i have a hassle here, somebody could clear this me up, thank you
in our LAN we can send and receive over 25 port .. but i cannot send outside
nor receive from the big cloud, this is the main message i receive..
2006-03-27 14:03:14 1FNwzi-0002c4-KW <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=
machine.site.net.co
On Monday 27 March 2006 15:07, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> The incoming MAIL FROM: address - the bit immediately after the <= -
> appears to be an email address in quotes, and Exim is therefore
> appending a default domain to it (unless there's some weird rewrite
> going on here to which we're not privy
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 14:48 -0500, daniel wrote:
> Unfortunately, neither does mine:
>
> mainlog:2006-03-27 17:15:26 1FNvJO-000N7h-S8 <=
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"@cohen.mydomain.com H=dquinn.cubearmy.com
> [192.168.0.148] P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
> A=lookup_plain:[EMAIL PROTECTED] S=899
>
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:38, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 14:24 -0500, daniel wrote:
>
>
> > The database itself has no quotes in it and running the queries
> > themselves return both return "1" upon success. Is there a way to get
> > Exim to somehow "echo out" the value of $ser
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 14:24 -0500, daniel wrote:
> The database itself has no quotes in it and running the queries themselves
> return both return "1" upon success. Is there a way to get Exim to somehow
> "echo out" the value of $server_set_id somehow?
It is logged in the main logfile (providi
On Monday 27 March 2006 13:56, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 12:57 -0500, daniel wrote:
>
>
> > So it looks like these lines in my config are doing it:
> >
> > accept authenticated = *
> > control = submission
>
> What are the details of your authenticator section
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 12:57 -0500, daniel wrote:
> So it looks like these lines in my config are doing it:
>
> accept authenticated = *
> control = submission
What are the details of your authenticator section? I'd suggest it's the
"server_set_id = " which is the source of you
I get a lot of spam that pretends to be bounce messages but aren't. I
can accept the message and run it through Spamassassin, but that creates
a lot of system load. So I'm trying out a trick I thought of that seems
to be working.
What I'm doing is that when the from is <> empty I do I DEFER on
I've been trying to track down the reasons for this for days now. The problem
is this: Whenever I send email from my desktop through my mailserver *without*
authentication (relay based on trusted IP) the mail is delievered and the
"Return-Path: " line looks as it should:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:54:44PM +, enediel gonzalez wrote:
> From: "enediel gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:54:44 +
> Subject: [exim] help with rewrite rules
>
> Hello
> I've exim4 running on a debian box, I have a set of processes run
Hello
I've exim4 running on a debian box, I have a set of processes running under
different users rights, they send email periodically using their user
address, I need to rewrite the sender field of their messages after they
generated them and before exim deliver these messages. To the final
d
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
> Yes, my IT experience and the fact I am owner of my company are
> relevant to this discussion. It shows I am aware of what I am doing,
> and am in complete control.
>
> And yes, you are trying to tell me how to run my company. It is MY
> company, MY email and MY money I
Mar Mathis,
Yes, I would be interested in what you do. My email address here is good, and
I'd be happy to hear about your measures.
And to Jakob -
Yes, my IT experience and the fact I am owner of my company are relevant to this
discussion. It shows I am aware of what I am doing, and am in
Quoting Mar Matthias Darin:
> save /dev/null
sorry, but this turns a wrong idea into a stupid one. If you don't like
mail, be polite enough to reject it at smtp time. Exim's ACLs are
powerful enough to do that.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim det
Quoting Jerry Stuckle:
> I'm sorry. Yes, they are. I was not asking for advice as to whether or
> not I should block other countries. I was asking how to do it should I
> do so.
It doesn't matter much. Starting a thread neither means owning the
thread nor having control over it. Everybody is f
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, dawnshade wrote:
> Thanks, i understand my error. But a last question - maybe remove extra
> whitespaces from spec.txt? I just copypasted from documentation this string.
That is a typo in the spec. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll fix it for
the next edition.
--
Philip Ha
Alain Williams wrote:
> I need to be careful to distinguish 'unknown user' from other 550,
> such as over quota/...
Why? If it is 550, it should be handled like a 550. If it is not, don't
send a 550 response code.
lg,
daniel
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
33 matches
Mail list logo
