[exim] getsockname() failed: Connection reset by peer

2006-04-24 Thread Alexey Danilevsky
Hello! Every 10-20 minutes I see in my exim's paniclog lines: 2006-04-24 12:15:39 getsockname() failed: Connection reset by peer 2006-04-24 12:15:39 daemon: fclose(smtp_out) failed: Broken pipe What does this mean? What is wrong? Can it be because of problems whit connection to LDAP server?

[exim] Exim course in July: Booking is now open

2006-04-24 Thread Philip Hazel
We are now accepting bookings for the 3-day Exim course in Cambridge, UK, in July (18th - 21st). For full details of the course and how to register, please see http://www-tus.csx.cam.ac.uk/courses/exim/. Philip -- Philip Hazel, University of Cambridge Computing Service. -- ## List details

Re: [exim] Maildir Quota excluding Trash folder.

2006-04-24 Thread Daniel Tiefnig
Derek Listmail Acct wrote: Subfolders aren't stored any differently than other folders, they just have the period in them more than once. Sadfully this is not the case with every IMAP installation out there. (Cyrus e.g. may use / instead of . to delimit subfolders.) How can nonexistent

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Chris Lear
* W B Hacker wrote (22/04/06 19:33): [..] I have a comparable archive of Courier-MTA traffic. It's a good list and there is a high level of expertise shared. But anyone interested in going there will need a much thicker skin than on this list. I'm subscribed to the courier-imap list,

Re: [exim] getsockname() failed: Connection reset by peer

2006-04-24 Thread Philip Hazel
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Alexey Danilevsky wrote: Hello! Every 10-20 minutes I see in my exim's paniclog lines: 2006-04-24 12:15:39 getsockname() failed: Connection reset by peer 2006-04-24 12:15:39 daemon: fclose(smtp_out) failed: Broken pipe What does this mean? What is wrong? Can it be

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Marc Sherman
Chris Lear wrote: PS maybe there should be an appendix in the manual called Why the exim-users list is so abusive, so that everyone could just reply RTFM - Appendix F. Just an idea. That was actually one of the things I was going to add to the MailingListEtiquette page on the wiki in the

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Adam Funk
On 2006-04-24, Chris Lear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PS maybe there should be an appendix in the manual called Why the exim-users list is so abusive, so that everyone could just reply RTFM - Appendix F. Just an idea. Would that be a recursive page? -- ## List details at

Re: [exim] How to choose between mbox and maildir? was: lock file

2006-04-24 Thread Christian Schmidt
Hello Philip, Philip Hazel, 22.04.2006 (d.m.y): On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Christian Schmidt wrote: How can I make exim (or better: the appendfile transport) decide if a mail shall be dropped into an existing mbox file or a maildir? The file_format option of the appendfile transport allows

Re: [exim] How to choose between mbox and maildir? was: lock file

2006-04-24 Thread W B Hacker
Christian Schmidt wrote: Hello Philip, Philip Hazel, 22.04.2006 (d.m.y): On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Christian Schmidt wrote: How can I make exim (or better: the appendfile transport) decide if a mail shall be dropped into an existing mbox file or a maildir? The file_format option of the

[exim] Wrong Date in Header

2006-04-24 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, for some minutes I had an accident (I deletet it) with a perl script which correct the Date: header if someone sends a messages from 1970 or 2030... So my question is, does anyone have such script? Please note:I can not use the From header of the Received: header from

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread John Burnham
As a matter of interest, is it posts that just say 'RTFM' that people consider offensive ? If I were to say, 'RTFM - section foo, subsection bar and pay particular attention to baz' (as I have done in the past), what would peoples' attitudes to that be ? The documentation is some of the best I've

Re: [exim] Authenticating with a an upstream SMTP

2006-04-24 Thread Tony Finch
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Menekhem M. Zviman wrote: My ISP, comcast.net, does not allow relaying. Is there a way for me to configure Exim to login to their SMTP server similar to what I do when I use a MUA (thunderbird)? http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.61/doc/html/spec_html/ch33.html#id2656387

[exim] Abusing transport to execute SQL delete

2006-04-24 Thread Andrew Lewis
Hi all, I have a desire to execute mysql delete statements in my remote_smtp transport :) which would be rather useful to me. I'm having problems finding a suitable place to put this though. I was abusing envelope_add_to, which worked fine, until I restarted Exim, at which point it complained

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Herb Martin
From: Chad Leigh WRT -- RTFM. I am not usually offended if told that unless the person is being a jerk on purpose. In other words, I expect I should do my part in the FM and/or Google to try and narrow my issue down before I go and ask for help. RTFM can be insulting, but is

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Herb Martin
From: John Burnham Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 7:57 AM To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive? As a matter of interest, is it posts that just say 'RTFM' that people consider offensive ? If I were to say, 'RTFM - section foo, subsection bar and pay

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 24 April 2006 13:57:18 +0100 John Burnham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a matter of interest, is it posts that just say 'RTFM' that people consider offensive ? If I were to say, 'RTFM - section foo, subsection bar and pay particular attention to baz' (as I have done in the past), what

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Monday 24 April 2006 01:35, Chris Lear wrote: * W B Hacker wrote (22/04/06 19:33): [..] I have a comparable archive of Courier-MTA traffic. It's a good list and there is a high level of expertise shared. But anyone interested in going there will need a much thicker skin than on this

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Chris Lear
* Ian Eiloart wrote (24/04/06 15:23): [...] Note, lots of people have said that this list is among the least offensive. I agree, and it's also one of the most helpful. Having said that, I think it's useful to try to avoid causing offense, just as one would in any public forum. So,

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Adam Funk
On 2006-04-24, John Burnham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a matter of interest, is it posts that just say 'RTFM' that people consider offensive ? Probably, because they're not useful. If I were to say, 'RTFM - section foo, subsection bar and pay particular attention to baz' (as I have done in

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 16:47 +0100, Jason Meers wrote: If someone asks a stupid question you can choose to: A) Answer it So the user knows the answer to this _one_ question but is not capable of helping themselves in future. Bad. B) Ignore it So the user doesn't even know the answer to this

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 24/04/06, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 16:47 +0100, Jason Meers wrote: snip In another mail, you also write: if you look back over the last 4 years, 232 threads contained the phrase RTFM, the number of individual posts within these 232 threads will

Re: [exim] Maildir Quota excluding Trash folder.

2006-04-24 Thread Derek Listmail Acct
Sadfully this is not the case with every IMAP installation out there. (Cyrus e.g. may use / instead of . to delimit subfolders.) This isn't Maildir++ compliant behavior though is it? -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Jason Meers
There's a huge difference. I answer a great many questions with something like 'you need a redirect router' and a link to the appropriate page in the manual. I'm of the opinion that this is helpful. Perhaps not quite as helpful as crafting a detailed solution (although that's arguable

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Marc Perkel
There are some people who are rude here but you do get questions answered. Even the rude people answer questions so I just tune it out. Exim is an awesome product and the support is good so I just try to ignore people with personality problems. -- ## List details at

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Marc Perkel
I added this to the Wiki. Feel free to go there and make it better. Be Polite - Be Helpful Different people have different levels of skills. Some people are very familiar with Exim and some aren't. What is obvious to one person might not be obvious to someone else. Comments like RTFM

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread John Burnham
On 24/04/06, Jason Meers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question? Are we saying that providing a reference (with or without the F word) is preferred over providing a more detailed answer because it's counter-productive and doesn't teach a man to fish? I think I'm helping someone when I solve

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Adam Funk
On 2006-04-24, Jason Meers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are we saying that providing a reference (with or without the F word) is preferred over providing a more detailed answer because it's counter-productive and doesn't teach a man to fish? I don't think it's that exactly; see below for my

Re: [exim] Maildir Quota excluding Trash folder.

2006-04-24 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Quoting Daniel Tiefnig: Sadfully this is not the case with every IMAP installation out there. (Cyrus e.g. may use / instead of . to delimit subfolders.) This may be true for the frontend (IMAP), but surely not for the backend, which is the only thing that matters to Exim. Cyrus uses some

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 17:08 +0100, Jason Meers wrote: Question? Are we saying that providing a reference (with or without the F word) is preferred over providing a more detailed answer because it's counter-productive and doesn't teach a man to fish? Yes. The issue of the F word is

Re: [exim] Abusing transport to execute SQL delete

2006-04-24 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Quoting Andrew Lewis: I have a desire to execute mysql delete statements in my remote_smtp transport :) which would be rather useful to me. I'm having problems finding a suitable place to put this though. I was abusing Basically, any option that is expanded, but you should use harmless one,

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Jakob Hirsch
I added this to the Wiki. Feel free to go there and make it better. done. For the future, I suggest that this page should be modifiable only by the site or list administrators (considering the official character of it, I think this is appropriate). At least, it should say itself that it's not

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Jim Pazarena
I have been guilty on several occasions of asking the most dumbest of questions. Most questions I have attempted very carefully to research, but couldn't seem to find the answer in the manual OR book. My most recent was about compile errors on FreeBSD, and after it was pointed out to me the

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 24/04/06, Jason Meers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a huge difference. I answer a great many questions with something like 'you need a redirect router' and a link to the appropriate page in the manual. I'm of the opinion that this is helpful. Perhaps not quite as helpful as

[exim] Exim+Spamassassin+Gmail issue

2006-04-24 Thread Mark Moseley
Just thought I'd pass this along in case anyone was having a similar issue with gmail or for some other domain. When my servers were bouncing messages to gmail.com addresses and had any SpamAssassin headers, gmail was truncating the message from that line downward. So the bounce message would end

Re: [exim] Abusing transport to execute SQL delete

2006-04-24 Thread Wakko Warner
Jakob Hirsch wrote: Quoting Andrew Lewis: I have a desire to execute mysql delete statements in my remote_smtp transport :) which would be rather useful to me. I'm having problems finding a suitable place to put this though. I was abusing Basically, any option that is expanded, but you

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Monday 24 April 2006 09:08, Jason Meers wrote: Are we saying that providing a reference (with or without the F word) is preferred over providing a more detailed answer because it's counter-productive and doesn't teach a man to fish? Yes. If it's in the manual, it's semi-obvious and isn't

[exim] ACL Confusion - why doesn't this work?

2006-04-24 Thread Marc Perkel
Seems like this should work. Can't figure out why it doesn't warnmessage = X-Blackhole: Yes log_message = REJECTED - Subject in personal block list - $h_X-Recipient condition = ${if

Re: [exim] ACL Confusion - why doesn't this work?

2006-04-24 Thread Dave Lugo
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Marc Perkel wrote: Seems like this should work. Can't figure out why it doesn't warnmessage = X-Blackhole: Yes log_message = REJECTED - Subject in personal block list - $h_X-Recipient condition = ${if

Re: [exim] ACL Confusion - why doesn't this work?

2006-04-24 Thread Marc Perkel
Dave Lugo wrote: On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Marc Perkel wrote: Seems like this should work. Can't figure out why it doesn't warnmessage = X-Blackhole: Yes log_message = REJECTED - Subject in personal block list - $h_X-Recipient condition = ${if

Re: [exim] Abusing transport to execute SQL delete

2006-04-24 Thread W B Hacker
Jakob Hirsch wrote: Quoting Andrew Lewis: I have a desire to execute mysql delete statements in my remote_smtp transport :) which would be rather useful to me. I'm having problems finding a suitable place to put this though. I was abusing Basically, any option that is expanded, but you

Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?

2006-04-24 Thread W B Hacker
Jim Pazarena wrote: I have been guilty on several occasions of asking the most dumbest of questions. Most questions I have attempted very carefully to research, but couldn't seem to find the answer in the manual OR book. My most recent was about compile errors on FreeBSD, and after it was

Re: [exim] ACL Confusion - why doesn't this work?

2006-04-24 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 25/04/06, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Lugo wrote: On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Marc Perkel wrote: Seems like this should work. Can't figure out why it doesn't warnmessage = X-Blackhole: Yes log_message = REJECTED - Subject in personal block list - $h_X-Recipient