On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:18:12AM +0200, The Hog wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> The address rewriting works and emails reach their destination, but the From
> address that is seen by the recipient contains the username of the local user
> on my host.
>
> The rewriting rule in exim.conf is:
>[EMAIL P
On 5/24/06, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If we give you an account on the server, are you willing to do the heavy
> > lifting? :-)
>
> It'd be an honour. I think I have perfected my script now. Since it runs DB
> queries directly, it can set the report dates according to the Wish
Thursday 25 May 2006 10:14 John Hall wrote:
> Magnus,
>
> Does your script enter everything as a 'bug'? It might be worth
> creating a new item 'wishlist' so that we can tell the wishlist items
> apart. They can then be migrated to 'bugs' or 'enhancements' over
> time.
The currently available seve
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 06:19:37PM -0500, Jess Mooers said:
> Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wednesday, May 24, 2006:
>
> >On 24/05/06, Walt Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:36:40PM -0500, Jess Mooers said:
> >> > Installed according to these specs
> >> >
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Walt Reed wrote:
> From: Walt Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jess Mooers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: exim users
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:56:38 -0400
> Subject: Re: [exim] Excessive amount of SPAM
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 06:19:37PM -0500, Jess Mooers said:
...
> I woul
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote:
> The only parts of the config I have edited are the domain I want to host
> and the relay_from_hosts setting.
What is your relay_from_hosts setting?
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
>
> thanks for that -- will give this a go later. It has the
> unhappy property that it could do the callout twice, of
> course; in the common case (primary is up) I could
> presumably suppress that by adding
>
> condition = ${if ne{DESTINATION}{acc
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Jess Mooers wrote:
>
> I have followed the above url instructions with the exception of putting
> ASSP in front of Exim. I have ASSP trained to detect [SPAM] and prepend
> the subject as such.
>
> I have the following DNSBLs setup in Exim
These will not help you at all becaus
Tony Finch wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote:
>
>
>> The only parts of the config I have edited are the domain I want to host
>> and the relay_from_hosts setting.
>>
>
> What is your relay_from_hosts setting?
>
>
> Tony.
>
hostlist relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : x.x.x.
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote:
>
> hostlist relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : x.x.x.160/29
>
> Where x.x.x.160/29 is my own subnet (remove x and insert real numbers)
That looks OK. Your server isn't an open relay.
Perhaps you can explain in more detail what tests you are performing, what
Walt Reed wrote:
> deny condition = ${if
> or{{!def:sender_helo_name}{eq{$sender_helo_name}{}}}{yes}{no}}
> message = RFCs mandate HELO/EHLO before mail can be sent
How would you ever see this in Exim? Wouldn't exim drop the connection
with a synch error before ever hitting this ACL?
Thursday 25 May 2006 14:26 skrev Marc Sherman:
> Walt Reed wrote:
> > deny condition = ${if
> > or{{!def:sender_helo_name}{eq{$sender_helo_name}{}}}{yes}{no}} message =
> > RFCs mandate HELO/EHLO before mail can be sent
>
> How would you ever see this in Exim? Wouldn't exim drop the connection
>
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Walt Reed wrote:
>
> deny condition = ${if
> or{{!def:sender_helo_name}{eq{$sender_helo_name}{}}}{yes}{no}}
> message = RFCs mandate HELO/EHLO before mail can be sent
Note that def:varname and ne{}{$varname} are equivalent.
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
Walt Reed wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 06:19:37PM -0500, Jess Mooers said:
>
>
> deny condition = ${if
> or{{!def:sender_helo_name}{eq{$sender_helo_name}{}}}{yes}{no}}
> message = RFCs mandate HELO/EHLO before mail can be sent
>
I've tried the above myself and it just had t
Thanks to everyone who answered. Looks like I have a lot of researching and
setup to do yet.
Regards, Jess Mooers
~~~
Landmann InterActive
1423 S. Park St., Madison, WI 53715
W 608-257-1558
www.landmanninteractive.com
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/m
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:26:04AM -0400, Marc Sherman said:
> Walt Reed wrote:
> > #If you are using a freemail address, it's got to come from freemail servers
> >
> > defer! hosts = /etc/exim4/whitelist
> > message = Forged Yahoo mail.
> > log_message = Forged Yahoo ma
Walt Reed wrote:
>
> As for the other issue of people using freemail but other MTA's, well,
> that's the breaks. Yahoo and hotmail are forged SO OFTEN that makes
> sense to have this restriction. If you send from outside of yahoo's
> servers, the domain keys signature is going to be missing as wel
HI,
We are migrating over to a new mail system running exim from a windows
server.
We will have two exim boxes one as a gateway server and the second as
the main server also running imap, pop3 and webmail.
We plan to bring the gateway server online a day before the migration so
that all emails ar
* Pat Hastings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060525 17:31]:
> When the migration is finished (about 8 hours) the plan is to set the
> forwarding ip address to the new mailserver. This should then allow the
> all the emails to be delivered.
Make sure you don't send DSNs back during the 8 hours, as the defau
On 5/25/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Pat Hastings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060525 17:31]:
> > When the migration is finished (about 8 hours) the plan is to set the
> > forwarding ip address to the new mailserver. This should then allow the
> > all the emails to be delivered.
>
> Ma
Hello,
I have a question about sending mail through exim without using SMTP to connect
to exim.
That is I have a script that generates mail files on a disk (currently its
format is in accordance
with another MTA) and wonder if I could still use this script to send emails.
The current MTA
sim
Hi --
I'm running exim 4.60. I know that the use of 'message' has now been
deprecated. I'm trying to update some of my config files to substitute the
use of 'add_header'. I have used the following acl statement as a test
case:
>
accept local_parts = postmaster
domains
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Doug Jolley wrote:
>
> I'm running exim 4.60. I know that the use of 'message' has now been
> deprecated. I'm trying to update some of my config files to substitute the
> use of 'add_header'.
You need 4.62 for that.
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http
> You need 4.62 for that.
Ah. Thanks, Tony. Now I see it in the change log. It's a long story; but,
I thought I was running the latest version. I knew it had to be something
pretty basic. I'll try to be more careful in the future. Thanks.
... doug
--
## List details at http://www.ex
Hello,
I have LOGIN authentication working, but I would like SPA authentication.
my exim.conf (I using exim exim-4.43-1.RHEL4.5)
begin authenticators
spa:
driver = spa
public_name = NTLM
server_password = ${lookup{$1}lsearch{/etc/mail/exim_SPA}{$value}fail}
server_set_id = $1
#
Right now, I've got exim set up as a mail hub for one domain. it accepts
mail externally and relays it internally. I'm looking to add mail forwarding
through an LDAP lookup for a second domain that I have for other users.
Basically I want my exim setup to send all mail for domain a.org to the
s
We have just done a very similar thing.
We used the authlib.schema from courier as our base schema slightly
modifying it to add fields such as forward to hold the user's forwarding
information.
Some good examples are:
http://www.bastard.net/~kos/mailrouter/
http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mail
Hi john, Andreas,
Thanks for the replies - had not thought about ndrs so freezing them
makes a lot of sense. Just need to figure out how to only freeze those
for the domain we are migrating - if possible.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
On Sun, May 21, 2006 2:30 am, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> I reviewed some statistics recently, and found that a spamassassin check
> for a missing closing boundary on MIME parts matches mail which is >99%
> spam and only 3 possibly-legitimate messages that I could identify based
> on the sender, rec
Witaj exim-users!
I got this error, I try to change gcc from version 3.3 to 3.4, no
effect.
klej:/usr/src/exim4/exim-4.62# make
`Makefile' is up to date.
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/exim4/exim-4.62/build-Linux-i386'
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/exim4/exim-4.62/build-Linux-
I'm having trouble figuring out how to make this work
For context, I'm trying to modify sa-exim.c to allow another argument
which is the user to use with the spamc -u switch. This is to support a
client who wants to enable teergrubing and have per-virtual-domain
spamassassin preferences. The
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Roland Roberts wrote:
>
> What I believe is happening is that $domain is not yet set when
> local_scan is being called.
>
> Which begs the question, can I really do what I've been asked to do?
$domain is a per-recipient variable, so it is not set when there are no
recipients (
> "Tony" == Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> $domain is a per-recipient variable, so it is not set when
Tony> there are no recipients (outside a mail transaction or in the
Tony> MAIL ACL) or when there are multiple recipients (in the pre or
Tony> post DATA ACLs and
Hi All
I am trying to create a filter for the mail with older or greater date
than 7 days.
I am trying in the documentation of version 4.6 something that can help
me.
Someone can gives a suggestion to me?
Andrea
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim deta
34 matches
Mail list logo
