On 30/09/2006 05:02, Asghar Ali wrote:
> I want to bypass spamassassin for my outgoing mails in exim. how i can do it
> ?
You could add something like
accept hosts = +relay_from_hosts
and/or
accept authenticated = *
before the call to SpamAssassin in the ACL you run for acl_smtp_
I'm thinking of rejecting connections from some 'spam problem areas' in
the connect acl.
Below are the config I wish to use.
Does anyone have anything to comment? Might I end up with some
unexpected problems? Are the regexes matching the end users and do their
ISP's really serve them with mail g
Hi -
Apologies that refers to some slightly peripheral software rather than exim
itself...
It appears that exilog is not displaying all rejections on my exim/sa-exim
system.
For example, the following was logged this morning:
in main.log
2006-09-30 08:26:32 1GTZEq-QI-FK SA: Action:
My exim configuration has the DNS black list check shown below and it worked
perfectly forever. Now it doesn't. If I watch the log in real time I can see
many log messages indicating that the check is actually being performed but
the program no longer tags the header with the X-SPAM-DNSBL.
The on
Florian Laws wrote:
>
> Like this:
>
> special_aliases:
> driver = redirect
> allow_fail
> allow_defer
> allow_filter
> data = ${if eq \
> {:filter:} \
>
> {${substr_0_8:${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/export/mail/special_aliases
> \
>
> {${readfile{${substr_8:${l
Marc Sherman wrote:
>
> You can use address_data for this:
>
> special_aliases:
>driver = redirect
>allow_fail
>allow_defer
>allow_filter
>address_data = \
> ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/export/mail/special_aliases}}
>data = ${if eq {:filter:}{${substr_0_8:${address_
Andreas Pettersson wrote:
> I'm thinking of rejecting connections from some 'spam problem areas' in
> the connect acl.
> Below are the config I wish to use.
> Does anyone have anything to comment?
Welll.. like my aging corpus 'good in parts'...
You are on to a technique 'of value', and we are ab
Hi all,
I am in the process of setting up a mail server using exim+imap cyrus.I have
studied the eim docs and configured exim's routers and transports.I have
some basic requirements in my mail server i.e any mail from:@tce.edu must be
handled by exim both from my local domain and external domain.
W
W B Hacker wrote:
>Andreas Pettersson wrote:
>
>
>>Might I end up with some
>>unexpected problems? Are the regexes matching the end users and do their
>>ISP's really serve them with mail gateways?
>>
>>
>
>You need not worry about that part.
>
>Many senders NOT using the ISP's MTA are zomb
Ashok tce wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am in the process of setting up a mail server using exim+imap cyrus.I have
> studied the eim docs and configured exim's routers and transports.I have
> some basic requirements in my mail server i.e any mail from:@tce.edu must be
> handled by exim both from my local d
Andreas Pettersson wrote:
> W B Hacker wrote:
>
*snip*
>>
>>OTOH, before we get this far, we have already dropped arrivals that do not
>>pass
>>forward/reverse lookup, have no DNS entry at all, so don't have to check
>>every
>>arrival against these lists. Far from it!
>>
>>
>
> God, I woul
>> God, I would love to have my setup like that. Unfortunately my users are
>> receiving legit mail from far too many braindead mail servers setups,
>> and the morality among those admins is "It's working so why care about
>> rdns?".
>> Me rejecting them would result in something like "Hey, we
Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>>>God, I would love to have my setup like that. Unfortunately my users are
>>>receiving legit mail from far too many braindead mail servers setups,
>>>and the morality among those admins is "It's working so why care about
>>>rdns?".
>>>Me rejecting them would result in
W B Hacker wrote:
>Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>
>
God, I would love to have my setup like that. Unfortunately my users are
receiving legit mail from far too many braindead mail servers setups,
and the morality among those admins is "It's working so why care about
rdns?".
Me re
W B Hacker wrote:
>
>
>Plus - we point out that aware of it or not, they DO have a problem. Several
>'major' ISP's will reject if they don't *at least* find an 'A' record, and a
>few
>want to see a PTR as well.
>
>
>
While we're at it, how can I make exim reject connections like these?
2006
Okay, not *me* per se, but my role accounts.
In acl_rcpt_to I have:
# Accept mail to postmaster in any local domain, regardless of the source,
# and without verifying the sender.
warnset acl_m0= Delivered to role account
local_parts = postmaster : blacklist-admin : abus
Dave Pooser wrote:
> Okay, not *me* per se, but my role accounts.
>
> In acl_rcpt_to I have:
>
> # Accept mail to postmaster in any local domain, regardless of the source,
> # and without verifying the sender.
>
> warnset acl_m0= Delivered to role account
> local_parts
17 matches
Mail list logo
