On Monday 04 June 2007 19:57, Jeanne wrote:
> On 5/31/07, Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeanne wrote:
> > > Does anyone have any experience with this issue, of giving end users
> > > the ability to see what email was rejected as spam during the SMTP
> > > conversation using Exim ACL's
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Jeanne wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply. If I understand it correctly, with fakereject, Exim
> accepts and delivers the message, but issues a (fake) reject message. I'm
> not at all clear on how that would help me with my issue of giving
> recipients a report of what messages,
On 5/31/07, Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeanne wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have any experience with this issue, of giving end users the
> > ability to see what email was rejected as spam during the SMTP
> conversation
> > using Exim ACL's?
> >
> > Any suggestions would be much apprec
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 18:34:43 -0700, Phil Pennock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2007-06-04 at 01:40 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> That could be possible. Can I get exim to log callout results?
>
>-d+verify
I mean, in the log when running normally. Not when debugging. The
issue does not happen often e
Andy
When you post to the MS list, worth mentioning what instructions you've
followed to install MailScanner - I'll see you there..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Phil,
I suppose that that may have helped /o\.
I'll have a go with the MailScanner mailing list and see if they have
any ideas.
Thanks,
- Andy
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
On 2007-06-04 at 08:48 +0100, Andy Millar wrote:
> I have a fairly boring setup using Exim and MailScanner. MailScanner
> gets email from /var/spool/exim4_incoming and puts it into
> /var/spool/exim4 for delivery.
This falls into the category of "relevant information it would have been
good to see
On Thu, 31 May 2007, David S. Madole wrote:
> Does anyone know why filter user variables ($n0-$n9) are not allowed
> to be expanded outside of filters to give the last value set to them
> in a filter?
Yes.
If a message has more than one recipient, and each recipient runs a
filter that sets $n0,
Phil,
> "ls -la /var/spool/exim4_incoming"
# ls -la /var/spool/exim4_incoming
total 32
drwxr-x--- 5 Debian-exim Debian-exim 4096 2007-03-30 14:45 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 rootroot 4096 2007-02-21 15:33 ..
drwxr-x--- 2 Debian-exim Debian-exim 4096 2007-04-18 01:18 db
-r 1 Debian-ex
