Kjetil Torgrim Homme schrieb:
> how many times don't you see people send "sorry about the
> repeat, had a typo in one of the addresses"? by aborting the send,
> Evolution allows me to fix the typo without inconveniencing others.
If you know which address was wrong, you can - and should - resend
On 6/11/07, Phil Pennock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2007-06-11 at 01:19 -0400, Andrew Radamis wrote:
> > My wonderful ISP has suddenly (like today I think) decided that I can no
> > longer send any mail anywhere on port 25, including there own mail
> servers.
> > They do however allow it thr
On 11/06/07, Frank Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My domain is in a virtual server, its exim.conf is
> almost the same as this:
> http://forums.rvskin.com/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=29
> i would like to do some mail filtering with it, i put
> a .forward file in my home directory,
On 2007-06-11 at 01:19 -0400, Andrew Radamis wrote:
> My wonderful ISP has suddenly (like today I think) decided that I can no
> longer send any mail anywhere on port 25, including there own mail servers.
> They do however allow it through port 587, with smtp-auth. This breaks my
> smart host and I
My wonderful ISP has suddenly (like today I think) decided that I can no
longer send any mail anywhere on port 25, including there own mail servers.
They do however allow it through port 587, with smtp-auth. This breaks my
smart host and I cannot find how to setup the smart host to send smtp-auth.
Hi,
My domain is in a virtual server, its exim.conf is
almost the same as this:
http://forums.rvskin.com/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=29
i would like to do some mail filtering with it, i put
a .forward file in my home directory, but it has no
effect at all. what I'm missing here? .forward fi
Marc Sherman wrote:
> mavior wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I have set up an exim installation, trough which i can easily send mails
>> to everyone, except for mail addresses that belongs to hotmail.com(or
>> .it) domain.
>>
>
> You are not alone.
>
> http://projectile.ca/hotmail.html
>
> - Marc
>
On 10 Jun 2007, at 22:13, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
> The strange thing here is that your server seems to send your mails to
> mxgate1.49pence.com which is _not_ an MX for gmail. The MX for
> 49pence.com are at messagelabs.com, which is a filtering service.
> Could you check your former logs and show
Timothy Cowlishaw wrote:
> ---
> extract from /var/log/exim4/mainlog:
>
> 2007-06-10 06:36:53 1HwX9M-0005WY-7T ** [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from
> remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host
> mxgate1.49penc
Hi all,
Hi all,
After having a suspiciously quiet inbox all weekend, I began to
suspect that emails weren't getting through to my account properly.
I use the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] - where the DNS MX
record for timcowlishaw.co.uk points to a debian box running exim at
marwood.timcowlis
mavior wrote:
>>
> Googling around deeper, let me think that this issue is probably somehow
> related with the Reverse Dns to my domain name thing, which i have not.
> For my testing seems that only hotmail servers would make a reverse dns
> before accept the mail!
> Anyone could confirm?
>
mavior wrote:
> Hello,
> I have set up an exim installation, trough which i can easily send mails
> to everyone, except for mail addresses that belongs to hotmail.com(or
> .it) domain.
You are not alone.
http://projectile.ca/hotmail.html
- Marc
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mai
On Sunday 10 June 2007 21:11, mavior wrote:
> Googling around deeper, let me think that this issue is probably somehow
> related with the Reverse Dns to my domain name thing, which i have not.
> For my testing seems that only hotmail servers would make a reverse dns
> before accept the mail!
> Anyo
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Sunday 10 June 2007 19:56, mavior wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I have set up an exim installation, trough which i can easily send mails
>> to everyone, except for mail addresses that belongs to hotmail.com(or
>> .it) domain.
>>
>> This is the excerpt from the exim mainlog:
>
On Sunday 10 June 2007 19:56, mavior wrote:
> Hello,
> I have set up an exim installation, trough which i can easily send mails
> to everyone, except for mail addresses that belongs to hotmail.com(or
> .it) domain.
>
> This is the excerpt from the exim mainlog:
> [...]
> The mail simply does not ar
Hello,
I have set up an exim installation, trough which i can easily send mails
to everyone, except for mail addresses that belongs to hotmail.com(or
.it) domain.
This is the excerpt from the exim mainlog:
> 2007-06-10 13:42:19 SMTP connection from [88.149.122.125]:3936
> I=[82.195.162.138]:25 (
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007, Stefan Onken wrote:
> Now I thinking about the best way to manage virtual domains and
> users with exim: I do not want to use mysql for this purpose,
> because the server is also running lots of websites and sometimes I
> am working on the mysqld as well and I am concern ab
"Mitchell Cannon" schrieb:
> (the server is behind a PIX that I don't manage,
You are bound to have very much fun with that pix indeed.
> However, from remote I get this garbage:
> <- 220
> *0**200**2**2**0*00
That is a PIX ... eh ... fea
hi,
On 6/9/07, Ted Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As soon as you accept, no further ACLs are looked at. It looks like if
> you don't find a virus, you then hit the accept target. Try changing
> your logic to DENY or DEFER. With the deny ACL, you will not have to use
> endpass.
Yup. You're r
hi graeme,
> So calling out to a network socket forces Exim to send the content -
> which in older versions of Exim was the unpacked MIME container, but now
> doesn't have to be (it depends on your config) - across the network.
Iiuc, that dependence is defined by whether or not whatever's
'listen
On Sunday 10 June 2007 12:56:35 Stefan Onken wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after reading the mailinglist for quite a while, this is in fact my
> first posting:
>
> I would like to setup a new web/email server running Gentoo and
> this time I would like to use EXIM instead of qmail which I was
> using the la
Hello,
after reading the mailinglist for quite a while, this is in fact my
first posting:
I would like to setup a new web/email server running Gentoo and
this time I would like to use EXIM instead of qmail which I was
using the last 8 years [1].
On qmail I was using the great vpopmail tools
On Sunday 10 June 2007 13:19, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> Another question: what must my MTA do, if it has to forward an E-Mail?
> Has it to add a (new) DomainKey-signature or not?
It should NOT add a new signature, unless it somehow breaks the existing one
(typically only mailing lists do that, no
Hi, again!
Another question: what must my MTA do, if it has to forward an E-Mail?
Has it to add a (new) DomainKey-signature or not?
Example:
1) E-Mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it signs the E-Mail)
2) Received by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it signs the E-Mail, too!) and forwarded to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (it s
On Sunday 10 June 2007 12:19, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> I know the option -bt to test the routing for an E-Mail.
> I'd like to know, if it is possible to specify a sender address to this
> option...
The -f option can be used to set $sender_address not only when you send mail,
but also together w
Hi, again!
I know the option -bt to test the routing for an E-Mail.
I'd like to know, if it is possible to specify a sender address to this
option...
It is very helpful, for example, to test what Exim does with a sender with
DomainKeys...
Is it possible?
Thanks
Luca Bertoncello
([EMAIL PROTECT
anand n wrote:
> I got the following error message in my server
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tail -f /var/log/exim_mainlog
>
> 2007-06-09 11:02:18 SMTP command timeout on connection from [192.***.***.*]
> 2007-06-09 11:02:24 Fail
Renaud Allard wrote:
>
> anand n wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got the following error message in my server
>>
>>
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tail -f /var/log/exim_mainlog
>>
>> 2007-06-09 11:02:18 SMTP command timeout on connection from
On Sunday 10 June 2007 10:01, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> Is it possible to define TWO transport (of the same type!) for a router,
> and a condition in the transport?
Yes. The transport option is string-expanded, so just use something like this:
transport = ${if some_condition {first_transport} {
Hello,
snowcrash+exim-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (So 10 Jun 2007 05:33:42 CEST):
> hi,
>
> i've Exim 'talking' to remote clamd/spamd daemons over TCP,
>
> av_scanner = clamd: 10.0.0.105 3310
> spamd_address = 10.0.0.105 783
Both do not resend the mail, they just evaluate, right?
The message
Hi, list!
Is it possible to define TWO transport (of the same type!) for a router, and
a condition in the transport?
I have two transports: one to send E-Mail to external servers, and another to
do the same, but with DomainKey-signature.
Right now, I have two routers, too. The first use the firs
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 17:57 -0700, snowcrash+exim-users wrote:
> > > i'm using CLAMAV & SPAMASSASSIN. both of which can listen on either
> > > UNIX socket or over TCP.
> >
> > Look at the content scanning stuff in the docs, you can configure the
> > spam and malware scanner functionality to call a
anand n wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the following error message in my server
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tail -f /var/log/exim_mainlog
>
> 2007-06-09 11:02:18 SMTP command timeout on connection from [192.***.***.*]
> 2007-06-09
Hi,
I got the following error message in my server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tail -f /var/log/exim_mainlog
2007-06-09 11:02:18 SMTP command timeout on connection from [192.***.***.*]
2007-06-09 11:02:24 Failed to create directory
snowcrash+exim-users wrote:
> hi,
>
> i've Exim 'talking' to remote clamd/spamd daemons over TCP,
>
> av_scanner = clamd: 10.0.0.105 3310
> spamd_address = 10.0.0.105 783
>
> i'm trying to clean-up my eximconf using aux acls.
>
> problem is, as config'd below, exim submits OK to CLA
35 matches
Mail list logo
