On 7/29/07, Timo Neuvonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, you propably need to set exim to listen to some other port in
addition to 25 (maybe 465), since many ISPs block access to foreign 25
ports to limit sending spam by infected machines.
local_interfaces = 127.0.0.1.25 : \
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Ross Boylan wrote:
The manual says that for the lmtp transport (describing the timeout
paramater):
The transport is aborted if the created process or Unix domain
socket does not respond to LMTP commands or message input within this
timeout
What exactly does abort
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Phil Pennock wrote:
Is there a way to attempt to verify a remote server's TLS certificate in
the smtp transport, without actually failing it? Something analogous to
tls_try_verify_hosts in the main configuration section for inbound
connections, but for outbound?
No, I'm
--On 28 July 2007 20:20:30 +0100 Phil (Medway Hosting)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I hope you don't mind me asking but I am tearing my hair out.
Mailman list server. Users using Incredicrap. Is there ANY way to stop
their mails arriving with all the text in an attachment ?
Try the
Hi,
exim4 -be '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Gives me: prvs=test/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then:
exim4 -be '${prvscheck{prvs=test/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Correctly gives me back: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I understand it the 073117d635 in this case is basically a
timestamp, encrypted with secret. This is so that after
On 30/07/2007 09:27, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Ross Boylan wrote:
I expect the behavior I want is the way exim operates, but I'd like to
be sure.
You are in luck!
Not at all, exim usually (always?) does the obvious, sensible and
correct thing. Maybe something to do with the
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Is my understanding correct? If so, what is the amount of time until
expiry? I can't see anywhere to configure this so I'm guessing I've
either misunderstood how it works, or the value is hardcoded and
unchangable?
Ok. I dug through expand.c and found what looked like
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:39 +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote:
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Is my understanding correct? If so, what is the amount of time until
expiry? I can't see anywhere to configure this so I'm guessing I've
either misunderstood how it works, or the value is hardcoded and
Chris Meadors wrote:
Is my understanding correct? If so, what is the amount of time until
expiry? I can't see anywhere to configure this so I'm guessing I've
either misunderstood how it works, or the value is hardcoded and
unchangable?
Ok. I dug through expand.c and found what looked like
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 09:27 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Ross Boylan wrote:
The manual says that for the lmtp transport (describing the timeout
paramater):
The transport is aborted if the created process or Unix domain
socket does not respond to LMTP commands or
I appreciate the help, but my ISP does not block any ports, so I don't think
I need to do any port forwarding, and I do have -
accept
hosts = +relay_from_hosts
control = submission/sender_retain
accept
authenticated = *
control = submission/sender_retain
but my
Robert
Robert Cates wrote:
I appreciate the help, but my ISP does not block any ports, so I don't think
I need to do any port forwarding, and I do have -
The other posters aren't talking about port forwarding, they're talking
about the (deprecated but still in use) SSL-on-connect usage of
I've searched around and haven't come up with anything definative and
was hoping someone here could just point me in the right direction, I'm
sure this has come up in the past, but my searches aren't coming up with
what I'm looking for.
It appears since there are so many accounts it takes the
On 30/07/2007 19:06, Robert Cates wrote:
I appreciate the help, but my ISP does not block any ports,
Yours may not but your roaming users may find themselves using ISPs
which do. For maximum ease of use for your users, I would strongly recommend
daemon_smtp_ports = 25 : 465 : 587
Richard Pickett wrote:
I've searched around and haven't come up with anything definative and
was hoping someone here could just point me in the right direction, I'm
sure this has come up in the past, but my searches aren't coming up with
what I'm looking for.
It appears since there are so
Richard Pickett wrote:
snip
Any ideas?
You haven't mentioned the details of your setup, but you'll see an
immediate improvement in response times and reduction in load if you
mount the volume/partition that the mail spools/mailboxes reside on
using the noatime option.
You may also get a
John Robinson wrote:
I know people disapprove of the use of port 465, but since it's the only
way of getting some MS Outlook versions to do SSL/TLS at all, I consider
What is wrong with port 465? Isn't it the default smtp over ssl port?
grep 465 /etc/services
ssmtp 465/tcp
17 matches
Mail list logo
