Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> For what it's worth I to would like to have a feature to choose to
> ignore 550 errors and do something other that bounce the message. There
> are times when you are sure that the 550 was in error and you wat to
> take a different action. I run into that myself.
>
The
Marc Perkel wrote:
> For what it's worth I to would like to have a feature to choose to
> ignore 550 errors and do something other that bounce the message. There
Bastardising the smtp protocol won't help anyone in the long run, except
spammers perhaps. But nobody is stopping you from patching
I added this and the problems cleared up.
* rcpt_4xxF,6h,15m; F,4d,1h
Matt
> > The exinext utility will probably tell you. Note that Exim retry rules
> > operate *per server* not *per message*.
>
> I think I see the problem of sorts now. How do I tell exim to retry
> te
Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>
> Marc Haber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a problem with a firewall that has a transparent SMTP proxy
>> which returns a 550 error on initial connection if the "real" server
>> that the exim behind the proxy refuses connections.
>>
>> This, of course, causes the exim behind
Hi,
I have set up an additional router that determines the target mailbox by
looking up an alias file using lsearch*.
The fallback wildcard alias is defined as *:peter. The idea was to route
every recipient (in local_domains) that doesn't have its own alias to my
mailbox.
Unfortunately, the reci
Marc Haber wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with a firewall that has a transparent SMTP proxy
which returns a 550 error on initial connection if the "real" server
that the exim behind the proxy refuses connections.
This, of course, causes the exim behind the proxy to immediately
bounce the message
Hi,
I have a problem with a firewall that has a transparent SMTP proxy
which returns a 550 error on initial connection if the "real" server
that the exim behind the proxy refuses connections.
This, of course, causes the exim behind the proxy to immediately
bounce the message instead of trying the
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:45:46 -0700 (PDT), Murf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>After messing about with sa-exim, I tried using ACLs. So far I have the
>following files in "/etc/exim4/conf.d/acl":
>
>
>00_exim4-config_header
>
>
>acl_smtp_data = acl_check_data
That one belongs into the main configurat
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:57:06 -0400, Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:50:47PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Debian's exim4 packages do not implement greylisting, and any
>> third-party package modifying exim4-config's dpkg-conffiles has
>> release critical bugs since
Steve,
That works a treat! Top 50 local domain destinations by message and volume are
especially useful for me. Thank you very much for doing that so quickly.
I'm sure others on the list will find this feature useful too, especially if
they are receiving for multiple domains like me.
Regards
H i all,
everything has been running great- for the last 2 weeks , however, I saw my
scan directory rather large ( i feel) du -ksh * 34Kdb2.0K
exim-process.info 54Kinput2.0Kmsglog174Mscan
is ok to remove the files in there ? they are old over a week old
_
I have installed the Exim RPM (exim-4.67.32.fc7) on my Fedora 7 server
(2.6.22.1-41.fc7) and configured it to work with a smart host (with
authentication) at my ISP by modifying the exim.conf which was delivered
in the RPM.
This replaced a previous Exim 4 installation on a Red Hat 9 server which
w
> The exinext utility will probably tell you. Note that Exim retry rules
> operate *per server* not *per message*.
I think I see the problem of sorts now. How do I tell exim to retry
temp failures every 15 minutes rather then the standard incrementing
retry times?
Is anyone else out there having
Phil (Medway Hosting) wrote:
> I hard block for no or generic rDNS and on HELO's that do not appear
> to be a valid domain name, on my "company" server and set SA scoring
> VERY high on "customer" servers (so it can be easily adjusted down on
> a per domain basis),
Phil, I would be interested to s
- Original Message -
From: "Darton Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exim Users"
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:02 AM
Subject: Re: [exim] HELO/EHLO reject rates
> I agree, no rDNS would be a good rejection criterion if we could
> assume everyone was following the standards,
I h
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Matt wrote:
> My exim server only seems to retry about every 10 hours according to
> logs. Why is that?
The exinext utility will probably tell you. Note that Exim retry rules
operate *per server* not *per message*.
--
Philip HazelUniversity of Cambridge Comput
ROGERS Richard wrote:
> On a slightly related issue - I have an idea that the hit rate from RBLs
> (we prinicpally use MAPS+ and Spamhaus) may not be as high is it was a
> couple of months ago. Does anyone else have the same feeling (or any
> data to confirm/deny)?
I noticed this to. The number of
Thank you very much Peter, and everyone who have contributed valuable insite
on howto stop spam.
Peter Bowyer-2 wrote:
>
> On 17/09/2007, Elijah Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I've been searching the web on howto block domain with this SPF entry
>> "v=spf1
>> +all" on exim4 on debian
Hi All,
I'm trying to use the dovecot_plain authenticator example from the
manual to do authentication for my exim 4.68 install. I modified the
server_socket directive to point at "/var/run/dovecot/auth-worker.^\\d
+\$"
I'm getting the error message: "dovecot_plain authenticator failed
fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
