Re: [exim] Make permanent error temporary?

2007-09-25 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 18:19 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > Did you read what you quoted? They think their product does not need > fixing as it is working as designed. And they're correct. Putting on my Devil's Advocate cloak for a moment, just imagine the following design discussion (which assumes rea

Re: [exim] exim4 and amavis

2007-09-25 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:43:25 +, Frank Høvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Obviously, I'm missing some important routing or transport config, but I >cannot see what, so I'm grateful for any advice. Maybe looking at the logs can help. Greetings Marc -- -- !!

Re: [exim] Make permanent error temporary?

2007-09-25 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:21:21 +0100, Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >--On 25 September 2007 08:35:28 +0200 Marc Haber ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:04:29 +0100, Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> --On 22 September 2007 12:56:53 +0200 Marc Haber >>> <[EMAIL

Re: [exim] EXIM TLS to Exchange

2007-09-25 Thread Tony Finch
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Darton Williams wrote: > > As an interesting aside, I noticed when configuring Exim to > authenticate to my back-end POP servers that TLS seems to be a > requirement for authenticating as a client. It's been a while since I > did it, but I remember authentication wouldn't work

Re: [exim] EXIM TLS to Exchange

2007-09-25 Thread Darton Williams
On 9/25/07, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Darton Williams wrote: > > > > Take a look at section 33.5 of the Exim spec, "Authentication by an > > Exim Client". You want to put your Exchange server in > > hosts_require_auth and set up an authenticator, probably either >

Re: [exim] EXIM TLS to Exchange

2007-09-25 Thread Tony Finch
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Darton Williams wrote: > > Take a look at section 33.5 of the Exim spec, "Authentication by an > Exim Client". You want to put your Exchange server in > hosts_require_auth and set up an authenticator, probably either > plaintext (34.6 for examples) or CRAM-MD5 (35.2) You might

[exim] exim4 and amavis

2007-09-25 Thread Frank Høvin
Hi, I'm new to most of this, but trying to learn, and hence wondering if someone is able to help me with the following: I have a server (Debian Etch) running exim4 as MTA/MDA, and I'm planning on running amavisd-new so I can test an anti-virus plugin. I've set up exim4 absolutely straight, for

Re: [exim] forcing smtp

2007-09-25 Thread Tony Finch
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Darren Jacobs wrote: > I'd like to force users sending mail to the smtp submission port 587 > to (1) be forced to use tls and (2) be force to authenticate. An addendum to ther others' answers: if you are doing plaintext authentication then your authenticator must have the co

Re: [exim] forcing smtp

2007-09-25 Thread Darren H Jacobs
Thanks for the feed back guys. I actually figured out how to do it in a somewhat less efficient manner but it has the benefit of giving separate error messages for lack of tls and lack of authentication so the user gets a more descriptive error if they're missing one or the other: -- . . . de

Re: [exim] EXIM TLS to Exchange

2007-09-25 Thread Darton Williams
On 9/25/07, Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi List > > Has anyone on the list managed to get EXIM talking to Exchange on TLS with > SMTP AUTH. > > We are using manual routes to forward mail directly to clients Exchange > servers we find it much better than multidrop mail boxes. However due to

Re: [exim] EXIM TLS to Exchange

2007-09-25 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 15:31 +0200, Craig wrote: > Has anyone on the list managed to get EXIM talking to Exchange on TLS with > SMTP AUTH. More than likely... but reading on, I don't believe that's what you want (at least, not that way round). > We are using manual routes to forward mail directly

Re: [exim] HELO/EHLO reject rates

2007-09-25 Thread Darton Williams
> >> score NO_RDNS 5.0 > >> > >> The default is 0.5. > > > > Isn't it RDNS_NONE? default of 0.1 in SA 3.2.3 > > > > And yep, way OT for this list :) > > Yes, my SpamAssassin 3.2 has RDNS_NONE, default 0.1 as you dscribe. > Looking for it I also found RDNS_DYNAMIC, which I think I may increase > fro

[exim] EXIM TLS to Exchange

2007-09-25 Thread Craig
Hi List Has anyone on the list managed to get EXIM talking to Exchange on TLS with SMTP AUTH. We are using manual routes to forward mail directly to clients Exchange servers we find it much better than multidrop mail boxes. However due to the fact that our Telephone Company only offers dynamic I

Re: [exim] Make permanent error temporary?

2007-09-25 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 25 September 2007 08:35:28 +0200 Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:04:29 +0100, Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> --On 22 September 2007 12:56:53 +0200 Marc Haber >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> In the mean time, the proxy vendor has confirmed that

Re: [exim] HELO/EHLO reject rates

2007-09-25 Thread ROGERS Richard
Ted Cooper wrote: > Darton Williams wrote: >> It would probably be best to do this directly in SA by increasing the >> score for the NO_RDNS rule in your local.cf, e.g.: >> >> score NO_RDNS 5.0 >> >> The default is 0.5. > > Isn't it RDNS_NONE? default of 0.1 in SA 3.2.3 > > And yep, way OT for

Re: [exim] HELO/EHLO reject rates

2007-09-25 Thread Ted Cooper
Darton Williams wrote: > It would probably be best to do this directly in SA by increasing the > score for the NO_RDNS rule in your local.cf, e.g.: > > score NO_RDNS 5.0 > > The default is 0.5. Isn't it RDNS_NONE? default of 0.1 in SA 3.2.3 And yep, way OT for this list :) -- The Exim Manual

Re: [exim] Make permanent error temporary?

2007-09-25 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:04:29 +0100, Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >--On 22 September 2007 12:56:53 +0200 Marc Haber ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In the mean time, the proxy vendor has confirmed that they believe >> their product is working as designed, and we'll probably fix the issue >