Thank you Ian for your reply.
I have read those sections of the book as well. I forgot to mention that we
are also working with the vendor to find out why some connections are being
dropped - so I hope I did not give the impression that I think the problem is
all to do with Exim. I also know
I've taken to breaking up my ACLs into tiny ACLs like one might break up a
large function into several smaller ones; less duplication of logic and so
forth where multiple ACLs have the same prerequisites. So far this is
working fairly well, but I just ran into a small problem with acl conditions
i
On torsdagen den 4 oktober 2007, Russell King wrote:
> The manual says:
>
> 40.12 Unset ACL options
>
> ... For any defined ACL, the default action when control reaches the end
> of the ACL statements is “deny
>
> which is an invalid result for the notquit ACL. Put an accept on the
> last li
"Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On torsdagen den 4 oktober 2007, Pixel // pinterface wrote:
> > [ bug with acl_smtp_notquit ]
>
> IMO it's clearly a bug. When the condition is "acl", acl_check_condition()
> calls acl_check_internal() recursively, but
Here is my RC start up file - I assume that you can modify this to meet
your Slackware needs. This is from a REDHAT install.
Code:
#!/bin/bash
#
# eximThis shell script takes care of starting and stopping exim
#
# chkconfig: 2345 80 30
# description:
Brent Jones wrote:
> Lets start an argument, and I believe you're all wrong ;)
> I manage Horde / IMP on several systems including my personal server.
That's funny, I moved from horde/imp to squirrelmail and user were much
happier. The former seemed to me to be bloated, ugly and hard to use. A
Derrick wrote:
> using Squirrelmail, but I'm looking for something a bit more sexy (Zimbra,
> gmail, etc) can I get people's suggestions about what they've seen that
> they liked?
Well, squirrelmail may not be sexy to you (though I disagree). It is
very user friendly, fast and easy to use. With
Ted Cooper wrote:
> PS Yes, I am a Slackware Zealot.
That's ok. ;-)
But real (wo)men use Linux From Scratch.
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
On 10/4/07 12:44 PM, "Peter Bowyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In common with many others, the exim.org lists have headers like these:
>
>> List-Id: A user list for the exim MTA
>
> I forget the RFC number, but they are standard. Very useful for writing
> filters.
List-Id:
is in RFC 2919
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:36:37PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On torsdagen den 4 oktober 2007, Pixel // pinterface wrote:
> > acl_deny:
> > deny
> >
> > acl_smtp_notquit:
> > accept acl = acl_deny
> > warn logwrite = How rude!
> >
> > This spits 'ACL for not-QUIT returned ERROR
Tony Finch skrev:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, sysadm wrote:
>
>> The problem is the "for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ons, 03 okt 2007 17:01:28
>> +0200" line As you can see it should have been Wed, 03 Oct 2007 instead
>> of ons, 03 okt 2007 which is a Danish date stamp.
>>
>> How can I change this date stamp t
Tony Finch skrev:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, sysadm wrote:
>
>> The problem is the "for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ons, 03 okt 2007 17:01:28
>> +0200" line As you can see it should have been Wed, 03 Oct 2007 instead
>> of ons, 03 okt 2007 which is a Danish date stamp.
>>
>> How can I change this date stamp t
On torsdagen den 4 oktober 2007, Pixel // pinterface wrote:
> acl_deny:
> deny
>
> acl_smtp_notquit:
> accept acl = acl_deny
> warn logwrite = How rude!
>
> This spits 'ACL for not-QUIT returned ERROR: "deny" is not allowed in a
> QUIT or not-QUIT ACL' into my mail log. That would
I've taken to breaking up my ACLs into tiny ACLs like one might break up a
large function into several smaller ones; less duplication of logic and so
forth where multiple ACLs have the same prerequisites. So far this is
working fairly well, but I just ran into a small problem with acl conditions
i
Tony Finch schrieb:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, sysadm wrote:
The problem is the "for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ons, 03 okt 2007 17:01:28
+0200" line As you can see it should have been Wed, 03 Oct 2007 instead
of ons, 03 okt 2007 which is a Danish date stamp.
How can I change this date stamp to a US date stam
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Jones
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 5:08 PM
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Subject: Re: [exim] OT - Webmail options
>
>
> Quoting WJCarpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>> check
Quoting WJCarpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> check roundcube. it was awesome.
>>>
>> Agree at full ...
>
> What is it that people find so awesome about RoundCube? I'm not
> trying to start an argument :-).
>
> We have it installed here side by side with SquirrelMail. There is
> no doubt t
>> check roundcube. it was awesome.
>>
> Agree at full ...
What is it that people find so awesome about RoundCube? I'm not trying to
start an argument :-).
We have it installed here side by side with SquirrelMail. There is no doubt
that RC is much, much better looking than SM, and
it has some
On 04/10/2007, Jeroen van Aart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a procmail filter to direct all exim list emails to its own
> folder? I have several, but sometimes a few fall through:
>
> :0:
> * ^Sender: exim*
> $MAILDIR/exim
>
> :0:
> * ^Reply-To: exim*
> $MAILDIR/exim
In common with many o
Tom Bombadil escreveu:
> check roundcube. it was awesome.
>
Agree at full ...
Fábio Rabelo
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
check roundcube. it was awesome.
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> I just did a security updete on debian etch, getting the most recent clamav
> version on 29 september.
> I saw yesterday thet now clamav is detting all the cpu it can get, but at the
> sametime is slooow .
Important NEWS: my problem was not in clama
Is there a procmail filter to direct all exim list emails to its own
folder? I have several, but sometimes a few fall through:
:0:
* ^Sender: exim*
$MAILDIR/exim
:0:
* ^Reply-To: exim*
$MAILDIR/exim
Thank you,
Jeroen
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
On 10/4/07, Derrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the OT, I was looking at Zimbra for webmail installation, but
> didn't expect it not be able to authenticate to the existing
> infrastructure (mysql, it's LDAP and AD only). Current installation is
> using Squirrelmail, but I'm looking for
Sorry for the OT, I was looking at Zimbra for webmail installation, but
didn't expect it not be able to authenticate to the existing
infrastructure (mysql, it's LDAP and AD only). Current installation is
using Squirrelmail, but I'm looking for something a bit more sexy (Zimbra,
gmail, etc) can
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, sysadm wrote:
>
> The problem is the "for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ons, 03 okt 2007 17:01:28
> +0200" line As you can see it should have been Wed, 03 Oct 2007 instead
> of ons, 03 okt 2007 which is a Danish date stamp.
>
> How can I change this date stamp to a US date stamp instead a
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, 宇翔 wrote:
> sorry , i have miss add below
>
> domainlist relay_to_domains = virtualdomainA : virtualdomainB
>
> it is can work now ...
For tidyness, I'd suggest adding a new domainlist
domainlist virtual_domains = dsearch;/etc/mail/Vdomains
then define relay_to_domai
Hi!
I noticed today that the $received_header_text default setting contains the
$primary_hostname expansion variable.
Shouldn't there $smtp_active_hostname
be used instead?
Regards, Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Breyha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.blafasel.at/
Vienna University Computer Center | Aus
Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
> It seems that at least
> --- exim-4.69-cvssnap-2007-09-28.orig/src/expand.c 2007-09-19
> 09:29:17.0 +0200
> +++ exim-4.69-cvssnap-2007-09-28/src/expand.c 2007-10-04 14:07:04.0
> +0200
> @@ -409,6 +413,10 @@
>{ "dk_status", vtype_dk_veri
Hello,
Lutz Preßler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Do 04 Okt 2007 14:42:23 CEST):
> is there any way to discover (within an ACL) that an SMTP client
> instance is using bare LF instead of CR LF as line endings (in
> principle requested by RFCs)?
I think, you can check for almost anything in a self implemen
Hello,
is there any way to discover (within an ACL) that an SMTP client
instance is using bare LF instead of CR LF as line endings (in
principle requested by RFCs)?
It's ok that Exim is more liberal in this case, but others
(especially qmail) are not.
The request is to have an Exim configuration w
Tom Kistner wrote, on 28.09.2007 15:26:
> I have added preliminary DKIM support to Exim in CVS. If anyone feels
> adventurous, please try these 2 tarballs:
>
> http://duncanthrax.net/exim-experimental/exim-4.69-cvssnap-2007-09-28.tar.gz
> http://duncanthrax.net/exim-experimental/libdkim-1.0.15-tk
On 04/10/2007, Andrew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't see it was useless, as the only chage was an IP address. I also
> disagree with the wiki page. Some of the systems I deal with contain
> protectively marked IP addresses which would be inappropriate to reproduced
> here - does that
That may well be, but it's a UK government requirement
If it's protectively marked information, then it's protectively marked and
that means it cannot be divulged unless a) the person you are sending it to
has the right clearence, and b) the person you are sending it to has the
need to know tha
Andrew Johnson wrote:
> Some of the systems I deal with contain
> protectively marked IP addresses which would be inappropriate to reproduced
> here
Security through obscurity symptom.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/li
I didn't see it was useless, as the only chage was an IP address. I also
disagree with the wiki page. Some of the systems I deal with contain
protectively marked IP addresses which would be inappropriate to reproduced
here - does that mean I shouldn't ask for help with Exim because I can't
post my
--On 3 October 2007 17:12:48 -0400 Jeff Boehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have been searching the FAQ and the archive and decided it was time to
> post to the group.
>
> Here is the situation: I am using Exim 4.63 on RHES. We send all our
> outbound mail to a third party external system
Graeme Fowler wrote:
> ...and has therefore been moderated.
>
> When you get round to it, Mr Das, please remove exim-users@exim.org from
> any social networking sites you might have added it to. This is a
> mailing list for technical discussions about Exim, not somewhere to talk
> about... well, y
...and has therefore been moderated.
When you get round to it, Mr Das, please remove exim-users@exim.org from
any social networking sites you might have added it to. This is a
mailing list for technical discussions about Exim, not somewhere to talk
about... well, you know how social networking wor
Hullo,
宇翔 wrote:
> hello all
>
> about my question , when i add below , all outside world message can send
> message to my virtual user mailbox
>
> but i think it's not good solution
>
> hostlist relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : *
>
> anyone know how to solve this problem ?, i wanna receive o
I have been searching the FAQ and the archive and decided it was time to
post to the group.
Here is the situation: I am using Exim 4.63 on RHES. We send all our
outbound mail to a third party external system which is load balanced
and geographically dispersed.
The Exim daemon is set to start a
Hullo,
but i use another mail address wanna send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
log always said relay not permmit ..
From which IP Address are you using to send to the different acoounts? if on
the
same box you might have to add them in the domain list as well.
>
> can anybody tell me why?...th
hello
sorry , i have miss add below
domainlist relay_to_domains = virtualdomainA : virtualdomainB
it is can work now ...
thanks all
- Original Message -
From: "宇翔" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] exim with virtual domain question
hi all
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
hello all
about my question , when i add below , all outside world message can send
message to my virtual user mailbox
but i think it's not good solution
hostlist relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : *
anyone know how to solve this problem ?, i wanna receive outside world
message (like yahoo gmai
45 matches
Mail list logo
