Re: [exim] exim script

2007-10-05 Thread Ted Cooper
Emmanuel Salinas wrote: > Hi there.. I'm still can't startup my exim.. > > I found this script and I have some question about it... > > source /etc/init.d/functions > on slackware.. Which is my "source"??? Slackware doesn't have function library hanging around (I had to restrict myself from s

[exim] exim script

2007-10-05 Thread Emmanuel Salinas
Hi there.. I'm still can't startup my exim.. I found this script and I have some question about it... source /etc/init.d/functions on slackware.. Which is my "source"??? #!/bin/sh # Begin /etc/init.d/exim # # Include the functions declared in the /etc/init.d/functions file # source /etc/ini

Re: [exim] match_domain question

2007-10-05 Thread Dan_Mitton
It also looks like I can use: bash-2.03# exim -be '${if match_domain{foo.abc.com}{abc.com:*.abc.com}{true}{false}}' true bash-2.03# exim -be '${if match_domain{abc.com}{abc.com:*.abc.com}{true}{false}}' true To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: [exim] match_domain question

Re: [exim] acl_smtp_notquit and acl conditions

2007-10-05 Thread Dean Brooks
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:48:45AM +1000, Ted Cooper wrote: > Graeme Fowler wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:15 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > >> Errm. ? 40.8 says (about the QUIT ACL) that "You do not need to have a > >> final > >> accept", and logically the same should apply to the not-QUIT

Re: [exim] match_domain question

2007-10-05 Thread Dean Brooks
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:38:12AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > exim -be '${if match_domain{foo.abc.com}{abc.com}{true}{false}}' > > return: > false That is the correct result. Now, this may be what you are looking for: exim -be '${if match_domain{foo.abc.com}{*.abc.com}{true}{false}}'

Re: [exim] match_domain question

2007-10-05 Thread John Burnham
> > Why does: > > exim -be '${if match_domain{foo.abc.com}{abc.com}{true}{false}}' > > return: > > false > Probably down to a little confusion in what a "domain" is. In your example both foo.abc.com and abc.com are domains and they're not equivalent. If what you want is a test to determine wh

Re: [exim] match_domain question

2007-10-05 Thread Ted Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why does: > > exim -be '${if match_domain{foo.abc.com}{abc.com}{true}{false}}' > > return: > > false > > ??? Because "foo.abc.com" != "abc.com". Try ${if match_domain{foo.abc.com}{*.abc.com}{true}{false}} -- The Exim Manual http://www.exim.org/docs.html http://www

Re: [exim] match_domain question

2007-10-05 Thread Mr Shunz
On 10/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why does: > > exim -be '${if match_domain{foo.abc.com}{abc.com}{true}{false}}' > > return: > > false > > ??? because domain IS foo.abc.com !!! or did you mean "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ? -- Daniele Santi.o. [EMAIL PROTECTED]..o

Re: [exim] acl_smtp_notquit and acl conditions

2007-10-05 Thread Ted Cooper
Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:15 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: >> Errm. § 40.8 says (about the QUIT ACL) that "You do not need to have a final >> accept", and logically the same should apply to the not-QUIT ACL. It's only >> explicit denys that are forbidden (at least by the imp

[exim] match_domain question

2007-10-05 Thread Dan_Mitton
Why does: exim -be '${if match_domain{foo.abc.com}{abc.com}{true}{false}}' return: false ??? -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

[exim] Exim Filter

2007-10-05 Thread Matt
I have this basically in one of my filter files: nano nano /etc/virtual/domainname.com/filter if $h_X-Spam-Status: contains "Yes," then if $local_part is "username" then save /home/username/Maildir/.INBOX.spam/new/ 660 else save /home/username/imap/$domain

Re: [exim] is there a way to prevent host based defer...

2007-10-05 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 4 October 2007 08:48:05 -0400 Jeff Boehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since then, I have changed again and gone with the method listed below. > Now my queue lengths are usually under 200 messages which is much better. > Perhaps this is the best I can do, I suppose I should let it run for

Re: [exim] acl_smtp_notquit and acl conditions

2007-10-05 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:15 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Errm. § 40.8 says (about the QUIT ACL) that "You do not need to have a final > accept", and logically the same should apply to the not-QUIT ACL. It's only > explicit denys that are forbidden (at least by the implementation). And by > th

Re: [exim] exim.org - searching docs/spec

2007-10-05 Thread Angel Marin
Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On tisdagen den 18 september 2007, Marcin Krol wrote: >> I'm not sure this the right place for this proposal, but here it goes: >> >> Searching specifically docs only on exim.org is rather inconvenient. The >> same site hosts this mailing list, which often is not what the u

Re: [exim] (SOLVED) Date issue (language issue in header)

2007-10-05 Thread Jørgen Giversen
Jørgen Giversen skrev: > Tony Finch skrev: > >> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, sysadm wrote: >> >> >>> The problem is the "for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ons, 03 okt 2007 17:01:28 >>> +0200" line As you can see it should have been Wed, 03 Oct 2007 instead >>> of ons, 03 okt 2007 which is a Danish date stam