Hi Randy
Randy Bush wrote:
smtp_accept_max_per_host = 4
yet
netstat -nf inet \
| awk '$4 ~ /\.25$/ {split($5, a, "[.]"); print
a[1]"."a[2]"."a[3]"."a[4]}' \
| sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | awk '$1 > 1' | head -4
shows
19 78.3.64.138
14 125.25.31.62
10 58.186.134.147
10 1
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:36 -0800, Phil Pennock wrote:
> You probably also want to try port 587 to avoid hitting any port 25
> restrictions imposed by your ISP.
>
Thanks for your reply. OK I'll bear that in mind. I don't _think_ that's
the problem here though. How would I change the port if I wa
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 00:58 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:36 -0800, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> > You probably also want to try port 587 to avoid hitting any port 25
> > restrictions imposed by your ISP.
> >
>
> Thanks for your reply. OK I'll bear that in mind. I don't _thin
Hi Randy
Randy Bush wrote:
i am being smtp flooded from numerous sources.
i have
smtp_accept_max_per_host = 4
yet
netstat -nf inet \
| awk '$4 ~ /\.25$/ {split($5, a, "[.]"); print
a[1]"."a[2]"."a[3]"."a[4]}' \
| sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | awk '$1 > 1' | head -4
shows
On 2007-11-11 at 00:58 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > hosts_require_tls = *.google.com
>
> Yeah, the log file said something about that -- unfortunately I couldn't
> find in the readme where that hosts_require_tls should be set and a
> Fletcher classic find / grep combination of the exim-r
Mark Fletcher schrieb:
I had a look at the files in the libssl-dev package, and that led me to
look at /usr/include/openssl where a ton of files are provided by this
package. There I found a tls1.h which is just a bunch of #defines --
including a TLS1_VERSION set to 0x0301. Clearly this doesn't
So - is Exim development still progressing? What's happening these days?
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
