HI all
Just an FYI on the below, all worked great got the user to make max
recipients in a mail to 50 and I set smtp_accept_queue_per_connection to
51, the server pumped out the mails faster than before and half the time
:) and did not even put the server under strain.
Was about 3 mails in 4
Andy Smith wrote:
> Ah, if u were wondering what I meant by this
>
> "THe email address is valid, I changed it in the above so it doesnt get read
> by any nast spam scripts from the list site..."
>
> Its just that I had subsituted the domain name for the email address in the
> main log with xxx
Ah, if u were wondering what I meant by this
"THe email address is valid, I changed it in the above so it doesnt get read by
any nast spam scripts from the list site..."
Its just that I had subsituted the domain name for the email address in the
main log with x but then I changed it to doma
Hi,
obfuscated means u think I tried to intentianally make my post hard to
understand?? Sorry, i never heard it before and thats the
definition I found. I couldnt see any etiquete info on the list info page :S,
what can I do to make the question clearer or helpable???
Erm WRT how I found the
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:49:51 +0100, "Andy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>THe email address is valid, I changed it in the above so it doesnt get read by
>any nast spam scripts from the list site...
Obfuscated data, no chance to help. Sorry. See the Exim Mailing List
Etiquette.
May I ask where
Phil Chambers wrote:
>
> I have been using a printed copy of the 4.50 documentation for a long time
> because of the time and paper needed print a newer version. This is the
> trigger for me to pull my finger out.
>
> Thanks John for your reply and sorry to have wasted your time.
If you want
Hi,
Im trying to get a very basic config working, I just want my system to pass
email to an SMTP server for delivery.
Im using debian UNIX and the method of configuration I used was
dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config
I go through the screens of dpkg to configure everything up, and after when I
res
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:45:18 -0500 (EST) John Jetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Phil Chambers wrote:
>
> > It seems that what is needed is a 'match_ip'!
>
> Added in 4.52 I think.
>
> > Can anyone suggest a suitable way of doing this (I'm sure I must be missing
> > some
I want to make the value of smtp_accept_max_per_host depend on the IP address
of the connecting host, but can't see a decent way of doing it.
Note that the documentation says it is important that the string expansion for
this must be fast because it is expanded in the master daemon.
I thought I
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:22:21 -0800, Phil Pennock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (2) Your transport_filter script is returning non-zero.
If I recall correctly, in this case, exim gives a clearer error
message.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !
Dear Dave and dear Tony,
that sounds great! *Thank you very much* for your quick help and the
detailed description/example!
I will try it at once!
Holger
--
Holger Kling
Holger Kling's Profile:
http://www.exim-users.org
Hi
I have been speaking to Philip Hazel today, who I have had dealings with
in the past. I am looking for some Exim consultants and Engineers to
work on a contract basis for some clients of mine. Philip suggested that
I send a mail to the User Mailing list to find out if anybody would be
of inter
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Gregory Machin wrote:
> I'm looking for a working example of all the rules one can apply to
> block spam , thus making spamassasin the last res aught . I'v got alot
> of rules setup but still to much is getting though ..
"too much"? Have you looked to see how much is gett
Hi
I'm looking for a working example of all the rules one can apply to
block spam , thus making spamassasin the last res aught . I'v got alot
of rules setup but still to much is getting though ..
got fake mx records
got hello syntax checks
got rbls
got grey listing
I'm missing soming thing some
14 matches
Mail list logo
