2008/10/10 Jason Keltz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi.
I wonder if it's possible to add to my Exim configuration file, a
section that would temporarily suspend mail delivery to certain user
accounts that are specified in a file.
Sounds to me like you want hold_domains, but on a per-account basis...
Hi Guys,
I would appreciate your assistance in the following. Please know that I have
tried googling this issue to no avail. Perhaps I am searching with the wrong
search terms.
What I want to do for my specific email address is. When I send an email
from my address (for example purposes [EMAIL
I am trying to get Apple's Mail.app to play with exim4 on a Debian server.
$ dpkg -l | grep exim
ii exim44.69-9
ii exim4-base 4.69-9
ii exim4-config 4.69-9
ii exim4-daemon-light 4.69-9
I would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to get Apple's Mail.app to play with exim4 on a Debian server.
trimmed
Apple's alleged-MUA *can* be made to work, but we deleted it on all our
Mac's early-on, so I'm not clear on what it was we had to do, but..
ISTR:
- the early versions (OS X 10.2 thru
Hi folks,
I'm afraid I need some help with this, google and the docs couldn't help me
here. I try to get rid of spam as early as possible in smtp-time. I therefore
drop all mails with foreign domains right away, they are spam anyway:
(this is debian config)
acl_check_rcpt:
accept
hosts
Hi
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 17:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(gnutls_handshake): Error in the push function.
A quick google for that landed:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482012
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=297174
Both of which show the error as likely
On 2008-09-30 at 19:00 -0400, Chris Zimmerman wrote:
[ delivery subprocesses failing ]
Has anyone any thoughts on this at all? I'm not sure where to proceed.
I've just managed to replicate your problem. I'm not sure that it will
help you though, as in my case it was an example of PEBKAC.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Phil Pennock [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 2008-09-30 at 19:00 -0400, Chris Zimmerman wrote:
[ delivery subprocesses failing ]
Has anyone any thoughts on this at all? I'm not sure where to proceed.
I've just managed to replicate your problem. I'm not sure that
I'm reworking our exim config and was trying to eliminate/optimize
some lookups and wanted a 2nd (or more opinion) on the tack I'm
taking
The basic premise is making my list of routers utilize information
I've already picked up in the acl phase (is sender local, is recip
local).
I'm
