Graham Butler wrote:
> Could anybody guide me on the following bit of code for Exim (ver 4.68). It
> is designed as a 'test only' at this stage, until I can get the numbers right
>
> Does the ratelimit command updates its stats every time it is called, if so
> do I need to use the no update optio
Colin Keith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Like lots of people I've having a hard time with spammers misusing my
> customer's sites and services
*snip*
>
> Does any one have any suggestions?
Keeping in mind that once you have tamed/armored Exim, you still have to
get control over smtp-outbound capable
Hi,
Like lots of people I've having a hard time with spammers misusing my
customer's sites and services so I decided to look into using the
acl_not_smtp and acl_not_smtp_start ACL's.
I've cracked part of my problem that of tracing the sites by using
acl_not_smtp_start to add a received header to
If I am not mistaken, if the message was not yet delivered to the final
destination, any changes you make to that destination (forward, alias, etc)
would be seen on the next delivery attempt.
On 1/15/09 2:01 PM, "Peter Lauda" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to the list and I've looked through the ar
> W B Hacker wrote:
> > After using joe for ages, I now keep pico, nano, or mined handy
> because
> > colorizing makes text too hard to read (for me).
> >
> >
>
> Nano rulez!
Irrelevant to Marc's post, but nano supports colouring as well. I believe
though you may have to get the dev version, but
W B Hacker wrote:
> After using joe for ages, I now keep pico, nano, or mined handy because
> colorizing makes text too hard to read (for me).
>
>
Nano rulez!
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the
Hi,
I'm new to the list and I've looked through the archives for an answer first
but no luck.
We have exim running and it has been working fine. Our exchange server died and
mail destined to the domain it services is queued in exim now. I have put
forwards in as a temporary measure to handle n
Andres Lucena wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting the "Unrouteable address" error (this must be a classic)
> when I try to send to remote mail accounts. I don't receive anything
> so when I look to the log (tail -f /var/log/exim4/mainlog) I get this:
>
> andresluc...@gmail.com: Unrouteable address
1
Hello,
I'm getting the "Unrouteable address" error (this must be a classic)
when I try to send to remote mail accounts. I don't receive anything
so when I look to the log (tail -f /var/log/exim4/mainlog) I get this:
andresluc...@gmail.com: Unrouteable address
But the thing is that I can see gma
Alain Williams wrote:
> Maybe, but it still rejects domains listed in the file.
> What I want to do is sender verification for all domains *except* those
> listed in the file.
>
You need to define custom ACL. Do smth like this:
domainlist nosv_domains_whitelist =
lsearch:/etc/exim4/nosv_doma
> Funny you should find the colorizing feature of joe beneficial.
You can disable it. :) But IMO joe is the best editor out there. And
I've configured exim with non-colored joe for 7 years. But I got
tired of hard to read configuration. And I've been using joe for 14
years at least so I could say
Peter Bowyer wrote:
>
> $ doesn't signify a variable, it signifies an expansion. The use of $
> when assigning an acl variable would be inconsistent with this.
Same goes for the def: operator, as highlighted in the OP's picture.
Exim's syntax is actually quite internally consistent.
- Marc
--
> $ doesn't signify a variable, it signifies an expansion. The use of $
> when assigning an acl variable would be inconsistent with this.
Oh, I though ${ was the expansion - but your comment makes logical sense.
So 'perfect' coloring would need even more work. First to recognize
reserved keywor
2009/1/15 :
>
> So please consider as feature request to standardize syntax to use $ for all
> varibles and everywhere.
>
$ doesn't signify a variable, it signifies an expansion. The use of $
when assigning an acl variable would be inconsistent with this.
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: pe...@bowyer.or
jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com wrote:
> I got tired of single-color-hard-to-read-text on editor when configuring
> exim - so I quickly implemented in syntax highlighting into joe (Joe's
> Own Editor) state machine. However working with Exim config file is not
> that simple, as configuration syn
Could anybody guide me on the following bit of code for Exim (ver 4.68). It is
designed as a 'test only' at this stage, until I can get the numbers right
Does the ratelimit command updates its stats every time it is called, if so do
I need to use the no update options on any subsequent use.
Any
I got tired of single-color-hard-to-read-text on editor when configuring
exim - so I quickly implemented in syntax highlighting into joe (Joe's
Own Editor) state machine. However working with Exim config file is not
that simple, as configuration syntax is not the best possible. This
highlightin
17 matches
Mail list logo
