Re: [exim] Retry settings not apply some times

2016-06-30 Thread LinuxAdmin
Hi Heiko, Thanks for your reply. Pls find the output of exim_dumpdb retry. T:drmg.proskauer.com:207.210.172.112/NULL 110 333 Connection timed out 17-Jun-2016 08:44:13 30-Jun-2016 22:09:59 01-Jul-2016 04:09:59 * T:usmg.proskauer.com:207.210.181.112/NULL 110 333 Connection timed out 17-Jun-

Re: [exim] Router or ACL - Deny all but one domain for specific IPs

2016-06-30 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Peter Leeman (Do 30 Jun 2016 13:43:48 CEST): > Heiko > > Thanks for the response. I'll test this out so I can get to grips with the > AND aspect. Chris suggested a different solution which I am going to use, as > it looks more efficient than the one I was trying to use. > > deny >

Re: [exim] Retry settings not apply some times

2016-06-30 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
LinuxAdmin (Do 30 Jun 2016 09:26:06 CEST): > > 2016-06-28 14:06:03 1bHyKh-0002u8-Np <= a...@example.com H=srvr.example.com > (123.456.789.12) [231.146.47.4] P=smtp S=897805 T="Department of Health" from > for x...@proskauer.com b...@example1.com a...@example.com > 2016-06-28 14:06:06 1bHyKh-00

Re: [exim] Help using cutthrough_delivery

2016-06-30 Thread Rob Szarka
On 6/30/2016 6:39 AM, Jgh wrote: But did that ACL verb complete? Or fail on the verify and go on to the next verb? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the acl syntax? In the following, if the verify fails, shouldn't that trigger a deny? accept domains = +relay_domains endpass l

Re: [exim] Bounce spam

2016-06-30 Thread Lena
> From: John McMurray > <= <> H=cpe-172-89-165-229.socal.res.rr.com I have ^cpe-\d+-\d+-\d+-\d+\.\w+\.res\.rr\.com$ in my local blacklist. Other similar hostnames condition = ${if match{$sender_host_name}{\N(\d{1,3}[-.]){3}\d\N}} get greylisted. https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/LenasConfig --

Re: [exim] Bounce spam

2016-06-30 Thread John McMurray
Thanks Jason I do use a few RBLs. Including one of my own - http://dnsbl.phpwebhost.co.za - which is nice in the sense that I have a wordpress plugin called "PWH Honey Pot" so in theory it makes it extremely easy for wordpress sites to contribute to the honey pot email addresses. Sorbs is a

Re: [exim] Router or ACL - Deny all but one domain for specific IPs

2016-06-30 Thread Peter Leeman
Heiko Thanks for the response. I'll test this out so I can get to grips with the AND aspect. Chris suggested a different solution which I am going to use, as it looks more efficient than the one I was trying to use. deny hosts = /etc/exim4/conf.d/tmc-config/relay_from_

Re: [exim] Router or ACL - Deny all but one domain for specific IPs

2016-06-30 Thread Peter Leeman
Hi Chris Thanks for the response, this has worked perfectly, nice and slick, and I have been able to get rid of two smarthost blocks. Pete. -Original Message- From: Chris Siebenmann [mailto:c...@cs.toronto.edu] Sent: 29 June 2016 22:05 To: Peter Leeman Cc: exim-users@exim.org; c...@cs.t

Re: [exim] Bounce spam

2016-06-30 Thread Jasen Betts
On 2016-06-30, John McMurray wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been seeing an increasing amount of spam arriving as bounce > messages. I'm not sure at all if this is some clever trick to send spam > in a bounce format, or if its actual bounces that was sent somewhere > else with our email addresses as

Re: [exim] Help using cutthrough_delivery

2016-06-30 Thread Jgh
But did that ACL verb complete? Or fail on the verify and go on to the next verb? -- jgh Rob Szarka wrote: >On 6/29/2016 5:44 PM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: >> >> To make sure you're using the right ACL section, just put >> there some >> >> logwrite = I was here > >Confirmed. I changed to

Re: [exim] Bounce spam

2016-06-30 Thread Felix Schwarz
Am 30.06.2016 um 09:40 schrieb John McMurray: > rspamd looks interesting. Do you use that in place of spamassassin? Yes - although also SpamAssassin should be able to detect all that bounce spam. The only "annoying" thing is that a lot of spammers test against the default SpamAssassin configurat

Re: [exim] Bounce spam

2016-06-30 Thread John McMurray
Hi Felix, Thanks for the reply... Yes, you're right, this is not so much exim related which is why I tried searching for a few days first. rspamd looks interesting. Do you use that in place of spamassassin? Regards, John On 30/06/2016 09:28, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 30.06.2016 um 08:40 sch

Re: [exim] Bounce spam

2016-06-30 Thread Felix Schwarz
Am 30.06.2016 um 08:40 schrieb John McMurray: > Below is an example. Is there anything I can do to prevent my users from > getting these? I've searched as much as I can but I don't seem to see anything > useful for this type of case. I might just be looking in the wrong places > (search terms). W

[exim] Retry settings not apply some times

2016-06-30 Thread LinuxAdmin
Dear All, I am using exim 4.80.1-2.1 and its working fine, but some times Retry rules not apply to the mails & mail got bounced at First attempt. This is happen many times, Pls see the log for reference. My retry setting is default as given below. # Address or DomainError Retries # -