Re: [exim] SMTP VRFY (was: gotcha: chunking and predata)

2017-01-19 Thread John C Klensin
--On Thursday, January 19, 2017 21:07 +0900 Christian Balzer wrote: > > Hello, > > On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 06:30:24 -0500 John C Klensin wrote: > > [snip] >> >> There are also some complex questions as to whether a server >> is ever permitted to refuse to accept mail with a >>

Re: [exim] exim-4.88 segfault at -Mc

2017-01-19 Thread Jeremy Harris
On 19/01/17 14:05, mar...@mejor.pl wrote: > I found coredump from exim What version of Exim, and what OS? -- Thanks, Jeremy -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list -

Re: [exim] exim-4.88 segfault at -Mc

2017-01-19 Thread mar...@mejor.pl
W dniu 19.01.2017 o 15:25, Jeremy Harris pisze: > On 19/01/17 14:05, mar...@mejor.pl wrote: >> I found coredump from exim > > What version of Exim, and what OS? Version is in subject, OS is Gentoo, # exim -bV Exim version 4.88 #1 built 10-Jan-2017 15:05:59 Copyright (c) University of

[exim] exim-4.88 segfault at -Mc

2017-01-19 Thread mar...@mejor.pl
Hi! I found coredump from exim, this is what gdb says: > warning: Could not load shared library symbols for linux-vdso.so.1. > Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"? > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". >

Re: [exim] SMTP VRFY (was: gotcha: chunking and predata)

2017-01-19 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello, On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 06:30:24 -0500 John C Klensin wrote: [snip] > > There are also some complex questions as to whether a server is > ever permitted to refuse to accept mail with a backward-pointing > address of "<>". Unless tied to either the identifying > information in EHLO/HELO or

Re: [exim] SMTP VRFY (was: gotcha: chunking and predata)

2017-01-19 Thread John C Klensin
--On Thursday, January 19, 2017 08:59 +0100 Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Jeremy Harris (Do 19 Jan 2017 01:03:37 CET): >> On 18/01/17 21:50, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: >> > Side note: we should have: >> > >> > --> MAIL FROM:<> >> >

Re: [exim] SMTP VRFY (was: gotcha: chunking and predata)

2017-01-19 Thread John C Klensin
--On Thursday, January 19, 2017 09:59 + Jeremy Harris wrote: >>> I do not see anything >>> that is more risky there than RCPT TO. (Given current ACL >>> capabilities.) And in combination with the enforcement of a >>> preceeding MAIL FROM it even makes some sense to me. >

Re: [exim] SMTP VRFY (was: gotcha: chunking and predata)

2017-01-19 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Phil Pennock (Do 19 Jan 2017 10:20:19 CET): … > Hrm? I wasn't reading the other thread. > > Exim used to support both EXPN and VRFY but the default ACL is to deny, > so you need to explicitly enable via ACL. Although ... it's not showing > up in EHLO response, when I

Re: [exim] SMTP VRFY (was: gotcha: chunking and predata)

2017-01-19 Thread Jeremy Harris
On 19/01/17 09:59, Jeremy Harris wrote: > VRFY is not listed as a service extension in > https://www.iana.org/assignments/mail-parameters/mail-parameters.xhtml To confuse the issue more, an example in 5321 (D.4) _does_ list VRFY in an EHLO response. Exim doesn't (as far back as 4.50) - but does

Re: [exim] gotcha: chunking and predata

2017-01-19 Thread Jasen Betts
On 2017-01-18, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > --===1145591294== > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s89yJNDe6fM6BJKb" > Content-Disposition: inline > > > --s89yJNDe6fM6BJKb > Content-Type:

Re: [exim] SMTP VRFY (was: gotcha: chunking and predata)

2017-01-19 Thread Jeremy Harris
On 19/01/17 09:20, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2017-01-19 at 08:59 +0100, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: >> position to to introduce it. But, OTOH if Postfix and Exim would support >> it… (just dreaming) there would be a good coverage. >> >> Does anybody remember, why VRFY isn't supported? Mostly a case

[exim] poor man's cpanel/ispconfig/whatever. vexim?

2017-01-19 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Hello, on behalf of a customer (small hosting company) I'm searching for a simple (web) UI to configure mailaccounts. This UI should be something like a self service portal for the hosting cutomers. Ideally it is just a UI without any assumptions about the mail server software in use. (e.g.

Re: [exim] SMTP VRFY (was: gotcha: chunking and predata)

2017-01-19 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2017-01-19 at 08:59 +0100, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > position to to introduce it. But, OTOH if Postfix and Exim would support > it… (just dreaming) there would be a good coverage. > > Does anybody remember, why VRFY isn't supported? I do not see anything > that is more risky there than RCPT