Re: [exim] ATTN: Re: CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:05:43PM +0200, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: > Am 24.06.19 um 20:31 schrieb Andreas Metzler via Exim-users: ... > > M OTOH does not match everything but is much to broad since it does > > not match on the backslash at all. Also I do not see how "jeremy's > > version will r

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 25/06/2019 19:01, mixed8e--- via Exim-users wrote: >> and i was not sure if EXIM does publish that string in any other possible >> remote "access vector" too. > > That would be nice to know. A scan over the source gives me: - logged at daemon startup & shutdown - written to the process log on

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Calum Mackay via Exim-users
inlineā€¦ On 24/06/2019 7:18 pm, mixed8e--- via Exim-users wrote: On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 15:53 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote: Check your system for unusual activities. Symptoms on a hacked system I got aware of were quite similar. The log reported about too many received headers:

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users
Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users (Di 25 Jun 2019 14:48:20 CEST): > Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019, 13:53:26 CEST schrieb Jeremy Harris via Exim- > users: > > No recompile needed. smtp_banner. > This only set's the banner, but not the SMTP-Headers " by " which are > "public" too and used as a idicator

Re: [exim] ATTN: Re: CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
Cyborg via Exim-users wrote: > Am 24.06.19 um 20:31 schrieb Andreas Metzler via Exim-users: [...] >> M OTOH does not match everything but is much to broad since it does >> not match on the backslash at all. Also I do not see how "jeremy's >> version will reject any x24 in any part of the message",

Re: [exim] Extra copies of list mail (was Re: CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?)

2019-06-25 Thread Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users
On 2019-06-25 09:26, Bill Cole wrote: > > PS: I do not need an additional copy of list emails. I get > > very tired of getting them. If your MUA does not have > > a "reply to list" button, please get a better one. > > I swear, I'm going to start deliberately ignoring anyone > >

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users
Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019, 15:03:02 CEST schrieb Jeremy Harris via Exim- users: > Indeed; but only the banner was being asked about. ok, sorry for the noise. for me, the the Recvd header is a kind of "banner" too. seems a misunderstanding from my side. > You're interested in received_header_text

[exim] Extra copies of list mail (was Re: CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?)

2019-06-25 Thread Bill Cole via Exim-users
On 25 Jun 2019, at 9:03, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: PS: I do not need an additional copy of list emails. I get very tired of getting them. If your MUA does not have a "reply to list" button, please get a better one. I swear, I'm going to start deliberately ignoring any

Re: [exim] ATTN: Re: CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Cyborg via Exim-users
Am 24.06.19 um 20:31 schrieb Andreas Metzler via Exim-users: > > Hello Marius, > > would you mind explaining this? There are many differences between > these rules Yes .. > J ^.*\\0?44 > M ^.*0.44 > > J tries to match on \044 or \44, M on 0.44 and 0a44, ... 0z44 Yes, it does. It circumvented the

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 25/06/2019 13:48, Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users wrote: > Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019, 13:53:26 CEST schrieb Jeremy Harris via Exim- > users: >> No recompile needed. smtp_banner. > This only set's the banner, but not the SMTP-Headers " by " which are > "public" too and used as a idicator for "

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users
Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019, 13:53:26 CEST schrieb Jeremy Harris via Exim- users: > No recompile needed. smtp_banner. This only set's the banner, but not the SMTP-Headers " by " which are "public" too and used as a idicator for "security researchers" (by my experience) - i.e. germany BSI. hth,

Re: [exim] Help with AUTH DDOS

2019-06-25 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 24/06/2019 19:35, mixed8e--- via Exim-users wrote: > What would be the Exim setting to limit the number of TCP connections? Or > is it a bad idea to limit connections like that? I do know at least one > group of users of this server sit behind a single IP address, so the > connection count for

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Wolfgang Breyha via Exim-users
mixed8e--- via Exim-users wrote on 24/06/2019 20:02: > Dumb question, what is the config setting that allows me to remove the > Exim version from the greet banner? https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-main_configuration.html search for smtp_banner Greetings, Wolfgang -- Wo

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 25/06/2019 12:41, Niels Dettenbach via Exim-users wrote: > Am Montag, 24. Juni 2019, 20:02:33 CEST schrieb mixed8e--- via Exim-users: >> Dumb question, what is the config setting that allows me to remove the >> Exim version from the greet banner? > If i remember right, there is no such option in

Re: [exim] CVE-2019-10149: already vulnerable ?

2019-06-25 Thread Jeremy Harris via Exim-users
On 24/06/2019 19:18, mixed8e--- via Exim-users wrote: > a group from May 20 which is > before the exploit was announced. Perhaps this is unrelated? There are no > cron job entries that try to execute these files. I'm not sure what to > make of them. Perhaps your system was already compromised by o