are those 3 not supposed to resolve in DNS? None of them does in my end..
deny message = GOODBYE!!! $sender_host_address is in a black
list at $dnslist_domain\n$dnslist_text
dnslists = dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net :
dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net : dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net
--
## List deta
Kamil Jońca writes:
> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
>
>> On 06/06/2022 19:46, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>>> Failed to create child process
>>
>> This would be the response from the OS to a request
>> to fork a process. Are you running in a constrained
>> environment?
>
> It is ra
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
> On 06/06/2022 19:46, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> Failed to create child process
>
> This would be the response from the OS to a request
> to fork a process. Are you running in a constrained
> environment?
It is rather "typical" debian box. I did n
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:33:17PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> On 06/06/2022 23:18, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
> > Just going over my spam and I find this IP 195.133.39.99
> >
> > sending a lot of junk. How can you block such a class C?
> >
>
> Multiple possible ways.
>
Me: *"These work in the same way as a DNS reverse look-up but instead of
returning a domain name, the result is a value depending on whether or
not that particular DNSBL is listing the originating IP address as a
suspected source of spam."*
Time I was in bed, asleep... it's not like an rDNS lo
It's best to use DNSBL /(DNS Block Lists)/ for this, because then you
don't need to update these yourself: e.g. that particular IP address is
already listed on all three block lists at uceprotect.net. These work
in the same way as a DNS reverse look-up but instead of returning a
domain name, t
On 06/06/2022 23:18, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
Just going over my spam and I find this IP 195.133.39.99
sending a lot of junk. How can you block such a class C?
Multiple possible ways.
One would be a
deny hosts= 195.133.39.0/24
acl verb (assuming you really want the class-C).
You
Just going over my spam and I find this IP 195.133.39.99
sending a lot of junk. How can you block such a class C?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 1
On 06/06/2022 19:46, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
Failed to create child process
This would be the response from the OS to a request
to fork a process. Are you running in a constrained
environment?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-us
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jeremy Harris wrote:
> With 4.96 you can set up speculative debug, using ACL.
> Anybody want to try getting a capture?
Thanks to Jeremy's patch in 462e2cd306 we did not see these errors again
when running a 4.96-RC1 build for a couple of days.
--
## List details
I have strange thing,
I found that some mails sends by logcheck are delayed.
After some digging I found that:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
echo bla |sudo -u logcheck mail root
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
makes this erro
Ahoj,
Dňa Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:59:51 +0200 Ale via Exim-users
napísal:
> As far as I understand, exim4-config leaves the default definition,
> unless you put a different one in the file exim4.conf.localmacros or
> in exim4.conf.template, but I didn't.
Some time ago i post you command to test ACL
12 matches
Mail list logo
