On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 10:56 +0100, Graeme Coates via Exim-users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I've seen this issue raised in:
>
>
>
> https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20220216.071725.892984cd.en.html
>
> and
>
> https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20220313.200645.624cc373.en.html
>
>
On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 18:44 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users
wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt via Exim-users (Sa 16 Okt 2021
> 17:43:57 CEST):
> > > This hh.schlittermann.de runs the latest Exim, and probaby sends
> > > you
> > > an SNI your server for some rea
On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 17:22 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users
wrote:
> Slavko via Exim-users (Sa 16 Okt 2021 11:14:45
> CEST):
> > I am not sure if it is related to migration, but recently i start
> > to see
> > something as this in my exim log:
> >
> > TLS error on connection from hh
On Mon, 2021-07-12 at 10:41 +0200, Luca Bertoncello via Exim-users
wrote:
> Am 12.07.2021 09:56, schrieb Andrew C Aitchison:
[...]
> > I had not noticed that this was paniclog.
> > Do you need some sort of defer option so that exim handles clamav
> > timeouts
> > gracefully ?
>
> Not of all...
>
On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 20:29 +, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
>
> On 07/11/2020 20:10, Adam D. Barratt via Exim-users wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 17:45 +, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
> > > 2. the return value 512 (really 2) is tripping on a password
>
On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 17:45 +, Mike Tubby via Exim-users wrote:
> 2. the return value 512 (really 2) is tripping on a password
> encrypted ZIP file for which there is no right thing to do:
>
> a) accept it because we can't decrypt it [might still have
> a
> virus]; or
>
> b
On 17/09/2020 20:56, Yves Goergen via Exim-users wrote:
>PGSQL new connection: socket=/var/run/postgresql database=)
> user=dfctl
>lookup deferred: PGSQL invalid filename for socket:
> /var/run/postgresql
>
> I'm not sure what's exactly invalid here.
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 22:43 +0200, Yve
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 15:09 +0300, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:23:46PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-
> users wrote:
> > On 25/06/2020 11:42, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
> > > Isn't it easier to remove "." and ".." from dsearch scan list et
> >
On 2020-02-21 09:42, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
i have a ipv6 ip running, which starts with 2a02:
as soon as i set a "interface = 2a02:." in the remote
transport, it get this:
R=remoteusers T=remote_smtp defer (-1): "2a02" is not a valid IP
address
for the "interface" option fo
On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 14:00 +, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Gary Dale via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
> > It looks like the remote smarthost thinks I'm not using TLS.
>
> No. TLS is about encryption. The 1iaJ5F-00053v-JS log says that the
> remote smarthost thin
On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 22:14 +, Jasen Betts via Exim-users wrote:
> dns_yahoo_aol:
> > debug_print = "R: dnslookup_yahoo_aol for
> > $local_part@$domain"
> > driver = dnslookup
> > domains = aol.com : yahoo.com
> > transport = remote_smtp_smarthost
> > route_l
On 2019-02-06 22:47, Graeme Fowler via Exim-users wrote:
On 6 Feb 2019, at 22:03, Klaus Ethgen via Exim-users
wrote:
So there was a bug introduced in the last few weeks in
start-stop-daemon
that I have to find a way around. The current situation is not
acceptable.
At this point I’m going to
On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 16:23 +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> ".*?" - given the *, the ? is redundant. And then so is the
> rest of the line.
Apologies if I'm missing some other subtlety, but ".*?" is a non-greedy
match - i.e. it will consume the fewest number of characters possible,
On Sat, 2018-02-17 at 15:15 +, tech-lists via Exim-users wrote:
> An IP *cannot* resolve to a CNAME as per RFC 1034. It must resolve to
> an A-record, hence the error "reverse dns failure".
Nope, I think you're wrong here. The nearest suggestion that I can find
in 1034 (although not quite on t
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 16:30 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:07:23PM +, Martin A. Brooks via Exim-
> users wrote:
> > > Solution needed as of 2 days ago.
> >
> > Have you considered paying for some exim consultancy work?
> >
>
> Did not know legacy bugs were considered
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 08:28 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> 1)
>
[...]
> What gives?
>
> 2)
>
> I have to push e-mail through every 3 to 5 minutes using a cron job.
>
> Why is the e-mail simply not flowing?
>
Isn't this just the "4 issues to fix" thread you already started a few
days ago, just w
On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 19:10 +0200, Andy Smith via Exim-users wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I want to set the return path to $sender_address, so I checked the
> documentation here:
>
> https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-some_com
> mon_configuration_settings.html
>
>
> A
On 2017-09-13 10:44, Quaquaraquà via Exim-users wrote:
Hi,
I'm just noticing that I am not able to receive any email in my
account. They all get blocked with the following message issued:
2017-09-13 11:26:33 1ds3wH-0003N5-Bs H=mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]
X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:
On 2017-06-13 14:19, Jan Ingvoldstad via Exim-users wrote:
Or, you could choose _not_ using Debian's split config, and create
your
own simplified Exim config instead:
In /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf:
dc_use_split_config='false'
Rename /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template to
/etc/exim4/exim4
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 22:41 +0300, Osman ÇAKMAR via Exim-users wrote:
> The "F = <>" section is empty.
Yes, that's how automatic responses are designed to work in SMTP, in
order to avoid mail loops. See, for instance,
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.5
> For this reason it does not
On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 23:02 +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 20/12/16 22:48, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> > But the next BDAT seems to announce come as the very next item, I'd say,
> > there is just a "off by one" error, on Exim's or Horde's side.
>
> Yes, that's possible. And given that Debian a
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 18:09 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 09:10 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> > On 17/09/15 04:07, Always Learning wrote:
> > > exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-string_expansions.html
> > >
> > >
> > >> ${listextract{-3}{<, x,42,99,& Mailer,,/
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:39 +0100, Tim Watts wrote:
> On 03/07/15 16:29, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > Lastly Tim, your MUA (Thunderbird?) seems to mess up threading for you -
> > your messages appear as replies to your OP, rather than correctly as
> > replies to Heiko. Can you please fix that? Tha
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 03:20 +, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
> I am not sure why emails are being blocked if they're returning on the
> whitelist for hostkarma
>
> The sender 207.46.163.187 is in a black list at
> hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com White listed 207.46.163.187 See
> http://wiki.junkemailf
On 2015-01-21 12:57, Jeremy Harris wrote:
On 21/01/15 12:50, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
I go back to the list with that discussion...
Am Mi den 21. Jan 2015 um 13:17 schrieb Jeremy Harris:
On 21/01/15 12:13, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Am Mi den 21. Jan 2015 um 13:09 schrieb Jeremy Harris:
How do they rece
On Thu, 2015-01-01 at 13:08 +0530, LinuxAdmin wrote:
> I am new exim user, i want to enable log_smtp_confirmation option in
> exim, but it give following error.
>
> Starting exim: 2015-01-01 00:44:23 Exim configuration error in line
> 173 of /etc/exim/exim.conf:
> main option "log_smtp_confirmat
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 12:49 +0100, Michał Giżyński wrote:
> Thunderbird receive whole statement "This message contain spam and was
> rejected, if you don't agree with that please contact us (0011223344)"
> whereas Outlook 2013 receive only 20 characters from last line of
> message "please contact u
On 2014-11-01 17:45, Dean De Leo wrote:
Hi there,
I am trying to setup exim on a CentOS 7 vps for the first time. I
arrived at a point where I am currently stuck setting up the
authenticators. No matter what I write in the configuration, it simply
gets ignored.
[...]
This is my configuration fi
On Sat, 2014-10-18 at 14:26 +0200, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" schrieb:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-10-18 at 13:27 +0200, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> > > I cannot find a way to disable SSLv3 on Exim 4.75...
> > > Could someone help me?
> > >
On Sat, 2014-10-18 at 13:27 +0200, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> I cannot find a way to disable SSLv3 on Exim 4.75...
> Could someone help me?
> Exim 4.75 was compiled with OpenSSL.
The recent exim-announce mail has copy-and-pastable configuration.
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20141017.093614
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 18:18 +0200, Mark Elkins wrote:
> I followed various guides on DKIM and Exim..
>
> http://www.iodigitalsec.com/exim-dkim-and-debian-configuration/
> http://www.systemajik.com/blog/implementing-dkim-with-exim/
> http://mikepultz.com/2010/02/using-dkim-in-exim/
[...]
> On furth
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 14:59 +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > Am Sa den 12. Jul 2014 um 1:05 schrieb Michael Grant:
> > > Does anyone on this list know what the state of getting 4.82.1 (or
> > > whatever is latest) into the backports repository
On 2014-07-02 22:09, Todd Lyons wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Chris Siebenmann
wrote:
and then expanded each in place. If an argument wound up empty after
expansion, it would be preserved (as empty). This was based on the
documentation wording that 'the command and its arguments are fi
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 20:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 08:39 -0500, schmero...@gmail.com wrote:
> >deny message = rejected because $sender_host_address is in a black
> > list at $dnslist_domain\n$dnslist_text
> >deny dnslists =
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 08:39 -0500, schmero...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have tweaked exim.conf so many times over the years, that I am
> concerned something(s) are completely disfunctional. For example I have
> been receiving spam from servers blacklist by mcafee & barracuda,
> reviewing the logs, I
On 2014-04-16 20:50, Privacy wrote:
I add
disable_ipv6='true'
to /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
Then, update-exim4.conf, invoke-rc.d exim4 restart
And, I get the IPv6 log again... :(
update-exim4.conf.conf is *not* a general purpose exim configuration
file (and I don't believe any part
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 11:24 -0600, Will Smith wrote:
> warn
> spam = Debian-exim:true
> add_header = X-Spam-Score: $spam_score ($spam_bar)\n\
> X-Spam-report: $spam_report
>
> warn
> spam = Debian-exim
> add_header = X-Spam-Status: Yes, $spam_score
> condition
On 2013-12-31 11:17, Gary Stainburn wrote:
warn
# GPS added 2013-12-31
# rate limit anything except: local LAN, hosts in
/etc/exim/no_rate_limit
hosts = !+internal_lan
condition = ${if ${lookup{$sender_helo_name} \
partial-lsearch{/etc/exim/no_rate_limit}}
On 2013-06-13 11:43, soumya tr wrote:
Is it possible to call an acl from another acl? Something like..
The exim documentation is a pretty good resource for this sort of
question. :-)
Starting from
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/index.html ,
jump to "42. Access con
On 04.01.2013 10:24, Sander Smeenk wrote:
Quoting Marcin Mirosław (mar...@mejor.pl):
I'm wondering why I've got in main_log
H=(mnch-4d044ae7.pool.mediaWays.net) in first line, and
H=mnch-4d044ae7.pool.mediaways.net in second line in the same
delivery?
As far as i know, the first H= enclosed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 11:47 +, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 21:41:09 UTC, f...@deneb.enyo.de
[...]
> > Is this on a socket? Then you can use sendmsg, which goes back to
> > 4.2BSD, released in, uhm, 1983.
>
> A little off. 4.0 was released in 2000.
FreeBSD 4.0 was
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 16:53 +0200, Cyborg wrote:
># And reject if the SpamAssassin score is greater than ten
>#
>denycondition = ${if >{$spam_score_int}{10}} {1}}
>message = Your message scored $spam_score SpamAssassin
> point. Report follows:\n\
>
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 15:11 -0400, Chip wrote:
> Additionally, I'm confounded on the use of P= which according to the
> exim manual indicates the protocol . . . how can a protocol be someone's
> email address as indicated in the snippet right below this line:
>
> 2012-06-08 12:51:48 1Sd2Pb-0007mS-
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:34 +, paul.mcilfatr...@bt.com wrote:
> # Deny e-mail with no sender address.
> denycondition = ${if eq {${strlen:$sender_address}} {0}}
> message = E-mail with '$sender_address' as sender address!
> logwrite = E-mail with '$sende
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 10:16 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Observations on the trace below:
> "R=filter_test T=easy_test defer (-24): transport filter process failed
> (2) while writing to /home/ross/mailutil/mbox" made me think the issue
> was actually in writing to the mbox. I think the actual erro
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 18:27 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> Can one example to added to the documentation ?
>
> http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/filter_ch03.html
>
> 23. Numeric testing conditions
>
>is
>
> I tried many possibilities including '=', 'equal', 'e
On Wed, May 25, 2011 08:47, Benoît Taine wrote:
> Le 25/05/2011 09:35, christoph.kli...@pgxml.net a écrit :
> -- f...@gmail.com
> R: smarthost for f...@gmail.com
> f...@gmail.com
> router = smarthost, transport = remote_smtp_smarthost
> host mail.gandi.net [2001:4b98:c:521::11]
> host mail.ga
[trimmed recipient list]
On Mon, December 6, 2010 11:47, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
>
> --On 6 December 2010 13:04:15 +0200 Warren Baker
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>>> Or, just to get the number:
>>>
>>> exipick -x | grep  '<'| wc -l
>>
>> Or just:
>>
>> exiqgre
Hi,
Stian Jordet wrote:
> I have a user which have a soccer contest going with his friends and
> co-workers. They are now about 60 participants. For a couple of years
> he have been sending out the results and standings to everyone
> participating. This have worked great.
[...]
> Two questions: 1)
Heiko Schlichting wrote, Thursday, September 27, 2007 12:37 PM
> is the content of bounce_return_body option expanded
> during generation of the bounce message?
No.
The documentation indicates whether each option is subject to string
expansion. bounce_return_body is not marked as such, and thus
Chris Edwards wrote, Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:40 AM
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> | The Outlook clients fail to deliver the mail and leave it in the user's
> | outbox, displaying the final line of the multi-line error in the
> | progress dialog; the Vista Microsoft Mail clien
Eli wrote, on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 3:29 PM
>> Errors created during the RCPT ACL are correctly handled, with Vista
>> Mail returning the error message from exim to the client. However if
>> the reject occurs later in the process (in this specific case during
>> the MIME ACL) Vista Mail silently
Stanislaw Halik wrote, on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 3:49 PM
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Errors created during the RCPT ACL are correctly handled, with Vista
>> Mail returning the error message from exim to the client. However if
>> the reject occurs lat
Hi,
In our exim configuration we use the MIME ACL to refuse mail containing
attachments with specific extensions, which has been working happily for
some time. Unfortunately, we've now run across a problem with this technique
when "Vista Mail" (Windows Vista's replacement for Outlook Express) i
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 14:24 -0400, Arthur Hagen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 19:24 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 April 2007 19:00, Arthur Hagen wrote:
> > > I guess many people assume that e-mails with the same Message-ID will be
> > > treated as the same e-mail on the recipient
On Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:26 P, Igor Karpov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Looks like exim distribution file from planetmirror is broken:
>
> mash:/home/jc> fetch -d
> http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/exim/exim/exim4/exim-4.60.tar.bz2
> fetch:
> http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/exim/exim/e
On Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:40 PM, Heiko Schlittermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to know if 'local_scan_path' is expanded ... and found it not
> even mentioned in the specs file.
>
> Bug or feature?
Neither, really. It's not mentioned because it's not part of exim.
local_scan_path
On Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:57 PM, Jens Strohschnitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> is it possible to change the default logfilename on 4.30
> named main.log to the old mainlog, without compiling the
> program ?
> Can I add this to the exim.conf ?
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.
On Friday, September 30, 2005 4:50 PM, John Jetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
> your mileage may vary, but seems to work in testing. If fed
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], it returns [EMAIL PROTECTED] I dunno how exim handles
> double
> suffixes like that, so this behaviour may not match it.
exim s
On Friday, September 16, 2005 11:22 AM, Nigel Metheringham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I think this shows up a wider issue. Documentation of utlities.
>
> exipick is actually a perl script, with embedded POD documentation -
> so its likely that
> perldoc /usr/sbin/exipick
>
> will give you
On Thursday, July 28, 2005 2:18 PM, Steven Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:36:39AM -0400, Marc Sherman wrote:
>> Jay Bird wrote:
>>> I've tried all of them. Which one do you recommend?
>>
>> The same recommendation has been made over and over again, but you
>> keep i
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 19:07 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> Jonas Meurer wrote:
[...]
> >.ifdef ${extract{mailMessageStore}{$address_data}}
>
> This isn't exim syntax at all.
.ifdef is -
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.50/doc/html/spec_6.html#IX571
Admittedly the above won't work as .ifdefs are e
On Friday, June 03, 2005 6:01 AM, Daniel Bendersky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi, any one know a good and fast way to delete all the messages in the
> queue that comes from one IP ?
[...]
> Currently I use this command, but is nor fast and not to effective:
>
> /usr/sbin/exiqgrep -r '@' -i|awk '
On Friday, May 20, 2005 11:41 AM, Chris Lear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mark Smith wrote (05/20/05 10:58):
>> Are there any *valid* reasons for a mailserver's HELO greeting not
>> matching the hostname obtained from rDNS?
>
> I think so. In a virtual server environment. Say one server has 10 D
64 matches
Mail list logo
