I have a hosting company and we power over 150 websites. Now AOL and Yahoo
can not handle all the e-mails we are sending out. We send out about 30k
e-mails a day and 50% of the messages come back as deferred. I know you can
signup for Yahoo's bulk e-mail program but do I have to signup every singl
I am not sure what the best way to go about this is. We run almost 200
websites on one of our servers and each website has a quite large user base.
Usually 10-20 of the websites will send out mass e-mails but the problem is
Yahoo and other e-mail hosts don't like the volume being sent from the IP
Hi I have a website named gaincoporation.com and whenever I send an email the
headers look like this..
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:35:45 -0400
Received: from gaincorp by alpha2.shiftcode.com with local (Exim 4.69)
(env
The problem is one of my sites has over 60,000 mmembers it tries to send
emails to. Would it be more effective to send 25 emails a minute then them
all at once?
Thanks for the retry rules I will use that.
Dave Evans-10 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 11:46:54AM -0700, Andrew Rosolino
behind
it was at 100,000.
Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
> Andrew Rosolino wrote:
>> So it tried to send the message for 5 minutes and then timedout and kept
>> the
>> message on the list? I am assuming it keeps trying to process these
>> messages
>> and wasteing 5 minu
Ok we have a serious problem.. there is over 9,000 messages in the mail queue
and a lot of them are over 4 days old!! I dont understand why there is
messages over 4days in it because we have it set up like so.
delay_warning = 100d
queue_run_max = 15
deliver_queue_load_max = 5
auto_thaw = 1d
So I should add that back because it's been running fine without it?
Ted Cooper-2 wrote:
>
> Andrew Rosolino wrote:
>> accept hosts = *
>> authenticated = *
>>
>> There is two parts that have that.. wouldnt that allow relay?
>
> There&#
; Solid State Logic
> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Andrew Rosolino
>> Sent: 06 August 2007 09:54
>> To: exim-users@exim.org
>> Subject: Re: [exim] Serious Problems .
3rdparty/mailman/mail/mailman \
'${if def:local_part_suffix \
{${sg{$local_part_suffix}{-(\\w+)(\\+.*)?}{\$1}}} \
{post}}' \
${lc:$local_part}
current_directory = /usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman
home_direc
http://www.truson.biz/services/relay_test.php
This says I pass all the Relay tests so I dont see how it could be relaying
it?
Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
> Andrew Rosolino wrote:
>> There is also a bigger problem.. most of those e-mails are all SPAM being
>> sent from our server
For some reason it is only taking out like 20 emails per 10 minutes =(.. why
is it being so slow with this.. here is some of my configuration for the
queue
queue_run_max = 15
deliver_queue_load_max = 20
auto_thaw = 1d
ignore_bounce_errors_after = 2d
timeout_frozen_after = 2d
Andrew Rosolino
For some reason our queue has over 100,000 e-mail messages in at and they are
as old as 48 days!!!
I have these variables set:
deliver_queue_load_max = 10
auto_thaw = 1d
ignore_bounce_errors_after = 2d
timeout_frozen_after = 2d
There is also a bigger problem.. most of those e-mails are all SPAM b
Ok also I am doing pop before smtp. I have login to incoming server before
smpt server. I just realized this isnt an exim problem but any help is
appreciated immensely.
Andrew Rosolino wrote:
>
> I am currently having a problem. For some reason when I connect to my SMTP
> server o
I am currently having a problem. For some reason when I connect to my SMTP
server or POP3 it does not add my e-mail to the relayhosts file. Then it
will give me an error saying I can't send out mail so I have to manually
insert my IP Address into the relayhosts file.
Is there any possible way to
I figured it out it thought it was Spam according to SpamAssasin. I set
SpamAssasin score to 7 and now its accepting it.
Peter Bowyer-2 wrote:
>
> On 05/04/07, Andrew Rosolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm <= [EMAIL PROTE
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=shiftcod
P=lo
cal-bsmtp S=5130 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm => /dev/null <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
R=ce
ntral_filter T=**bypassed**
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm Completed
Why would it be getting sent to /dev/n
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=shiftcod
P=lo
cal-bsmtp S=5130 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm => /dev/null <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
R=ce
ntral_filter T=**bypassed**
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm Completed
Why would it be getting sent to /dev/n
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=shiftcod
P=lo
cal-bsmtp S=5130 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm => /dev/null <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
R=ce
ntral_filter T=**bypassed**
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm Completed
Why would it be getting sent to /dev/n
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=shiftcod
P=lo
cal-bsmtp S=5130 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm => /dev/null <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
R=ce
ntral_filter T=**bypassed**
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm Completed
Why would it be getting sent to /dev/n
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=shiftcod
P=lo
cal-bsmtp S=5130 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm => /dev/null <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
R=ce
ntral_filter T=**bypassed**
2007-04-05 15:05:31 1HZXH0-00023O-Gm Completed
Why would it be getting sent to /dev/n
20 matches
Mail list logo
