[exim] Hints needed to run forwarded messages through a pipe

2007-06-26 Thread Erik Schorr
I currently use an SQL lookup and a redirect driver to handle forwarding through a machine we user exclusively for mail forwarding - it forwards messages that come through our spam filter appliance that are "alias" accounts, or relays messages that are destined to our local domains to a loca

Re: [exim] Hints needed to run forwarded messages through a pipe

2007-06-27 Thread Erik Schorr
David S. Madole wrote: >> From Erik Schorr on Tuesday, June 26, 2007 10:51 PM >> >> What I'd like to do is send messages with recipients that are >> "forward users" (as picked up by the sql_aliases router shown >> below) through a pipe, so the pipe ca

Re: [exim] Exim Mail Import

2007-06-27 Thread Erik Schorr
Exim can use either an mbox or maildir style mail spool. I'm not sure how exchange stores its mail, but try looking for something that simply extracts the messages into raw MBOX format messages and copy them to the respective users' mailspool on the unix system. The only way it depends on Exi

[exim] DomainKey signing based on Envelope or From Header

2007-08-07 Thread Erik Schorr
r control. It's very odd that we can set the selector to use for signing, but not override the domain reported in the domainkey-signature header. Is there a workaround for this? Perhaps a feature being worked on? Am I on crack and just trying to break a rule in the DK spec? - Erik Schorr -

Re: [exim] DomainKey signing based on Envelope or From Header

2007-08-10 Thread Erik Schorr
Tom, Good to know. Now I wonder if the DomainKeys specification honors this if the envelope sender and the From: header don't match, and if so, which _should_ the dk domain match? Tom Kistner wrote: > Erik Schorr wrote: > >> It's very odd that we can set the selector t

Re: [exim] Allowing sender verify when sender over quota

2007-08-13 Thread Erik Schorr
Jethro R Binks wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, John Horne wrote: (snip) > If a server returns any 5xx return code, it is saying "this is a permanent > failure, I do not want you to try and deliver a message here to that > address". Any more is purely informational. > > Since the point of sender

Re: [exim] Allowing sender verify when sender over quota

2007-08-13 Thread Erik Schorr
Jeroen van Aart wrote: > Erik Schorr wrote: >> In addition, someone who is legitimately using their own email account is >> far >> less likely to have a full mailbox than a mailbox whose email address was >> used > > I wouldn't say that. In my exper

Re: [exim] Allowing sender verify when sender over quota

2007-08-14 Thread Erik Schorr
Jeroen van Aart wrote: > Erik Schorr wrote: >> In addition, someone who is legitimately using their own email account is >> far >> less likely to have a full mailbox than a mailbox whose email address was >> used > > I wouldn't say that. In my exper