hey answer, accept mail and deliver
it with no problems.
Any ideas on other bits I could check?
Thanks
--
Gareth Hastings
___
Seeking Technical Information? Industrial Members can access data as JoinIT
registrants on http://www.twi.co.uk.
Hello,
I am looking to increase the number of concurrent connections my server
can handle. Currently it's the default limit of 20. Is there any kind of
guide on how high I can set this? The machine it's running on it only a
P3 1Ghz. I don't want to place it under *too* much load!!
Thanks
Gare
x27;d guess the rule would trigger the first smarthost every time.
Any ideas?
Thanks
--
Gareth Hastings
IT Systems Developer
Ext: 2226
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
> The idea is to apply the following to only the lowest MX
> record but accept the message on the higher MX. I thonk 90%+ of the
spam
> never retries and therefore doesn't go through Spamassassin and
reduces
> system load.
I find that most of my spam comes in via the higher MX. I guess spammers
t
> Hello, can you please, if there is, point me in the way or the
> documentation on how to limit the smtp ammounts, in terms of
> connections, troughput or any limitation. Fact is one of my servers is
> used to send distribution lists to our customers, the server has a
> huge bandwidth, so thats no
Hi,
Is there any reason why an aliases file that had
gaz:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fails to match on the wildcard section?
Eg:
---
exim -d -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sender address = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address testing: uid=0
> A quick check of the manual would inform you that:
> >
> > Note that the keys in an lsearch file are literal strings. There is
> > no wildcarding of any kind.
>
> You need wildlsearch (or nwildlsearch):
> http://exim.org/exim-html-
> 4.60/doc/html/spec.html/ch09.html#SECTsinglekeylookups
Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: Gareth Hastings
> Sent: 19 April 2006 13:39
> To: 'exim-users@exim.org'
> Subject: RE: [exim] Catch-all alias not working!
>
> > A quick check of the manual would inform you that:
> > >
> > > Note that the k
r the Exim server received the email
and forwarded the email to me.
Thanks for any and all help
--
Gareth Hastings
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mwinf3102.me.freeserve.com (mwinf3102.me.freeserve.com)
by mwinb3105 (SMTP Server) with LMTP; Wed, 03 May 2006 12:51:46 +0200
> Do any of the To: or Cc: headers contain the string "IMB Recipient" in
> them? If so it's a bug in Microsoft (a bug?!?! never!) Exchange
> Small Business Server 2003 POP-3 Connector.
Yup I found this
"IMB Recipient 1137" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Admission of guilt and patch here:
>
> http:/
Hi James,
> You did make mention of a Demon host in your posting, although I don't
see
> any evidence of it from the headers. If you do suspect a Demon host is
> causing a problem can you send the full headers to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please
> and it'll get checked out ASAP.
I first though one of the
> Just wondering how to do this. I'd like to test to see if the sending
> host at port 25 open. Would this be a good way to detect spammers?
Would
> a host sending email to my host not have port 25 open to receive
email?
I think this would be a bad test also. Often people who use smart hosts
or h
> Would
>
> a host sending email to my host not have port 25 open to receive
>
> email?
You'd like to think so but I don't think that is always the case. You
might find companies that have 2 MTA's, one takes inbound and the other
does outbound. The outbound could connect to you but not act
Hi Tony/List,
I was reading your paper on the Exim config for Cambridge University and
trying to learn a bit more and I have a quick question:
Ref:
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/hermes/doc/talks/2005-02-eximconf/
paper.html#3.7.%20Anti-spam%20measures
On line/part 0519 which is regard t
Hello,
I'm trying to match domains in system filter. I current have a text file
with a list of domains in it called /etc/exim/test/gdh which contains:
dom1.co.uk
dom2.co.uk
So far I've been testing my filter from the command line using exim -be.
exim -be
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]/etc/exim/test/gdh}{ye
>
> exim -be
>
'${lookup{${domain:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/etc/exim/test/gdh}{yes}{n
o}
> }'
>
> perhaps?
Thanks very much
>(Note that you don't need wildlsearch.) But more importantly,
> how are you going to obtain a domain in a system filter? Remember that
> $domain is not set, because there may
> Aren't I able to search through $header_to and $header_cc using
> foranyaddress? I'm currently trying to move a system filter that's
> running on an Exim 3.x system to a Exim 4.62 system. We current have
> filters that check for lots of domains a long winded way i.e.
>
> if $header_to contains
Hello,
Is it possible to write to the exim mainlog from a system filter? I know
you can log directly to another file but I'd rather try and get all the
logging in to the same file.
Thanks
Gareth
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://
> >> You wouldn't happen to know a good way to reverse the digits and
print
> >> the IP address backwards?
> >>
You could try:
cat file | sed 's/\./ /g' | awk '{print $4"."$3"."$2"."$1}'
Gareth
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://
> How about:
>
> cat file | awk -F. '{ printf("%s.%s.%s.%s\n", $4, $3, $2, $1); }'
Ah, I forgot you could specify the delimiter with -F!!
cat file | awk -F. '{print $4"."$3"."$2"."$1}'
(Less typing than above)
Gareth
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-use
Hi,
I have this in my system filters
if $message_headers matches
"(207.126.144|207.126.145|207.126.146|207.126.147|207.126.148|207.126.14
9|207.126.150|207.126.151|207.126.152|207.126.153|207.126.154|207.126.14
7)"
then
and was wondering if I can put the "(207.126.." section into a text
file
> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Metheringham
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 June 2006 15:25
> To: Gareth Hastings
> Cc: exim-users@exim.org
> Subject: Re: [exim] Another system filter question!
>
> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:09 +0100, Gareth Hastin
Hi,
>
> I'm hoping for some help in getting this right
>
These are the settings I tried which worked well
ldap_default_servers= 10.1.1.1::3268 :: 10.1.1.3::3268
LDAP_AD_BINDDN =
"CN=ldapuser,CN=Users,DC=twi,DC=co,DC=uk"
LDAP_AD_PASS= "Password"
Hi,
If I had a problem with a program that kept segfaulting and I was
calling it in a transport. Would it be possible to somehow setup the
transport to run gdb on the program capturing a backtrace?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Gareth
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Odhiambo Washington
> Sent: 23 October 2006 17:25
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Subject: [exim] SPAM Filtering - Losing the war!
>
> 1. You are using Exim and its techniques only
Hi Wash,
Don't you us
Morning all,
Am I right to assume the error "451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify
sender address" could be caused by incorrectly configured DNS for the senders
domain? When I do a lookup of the MX records for the senders domain I don't get
any results!
Thanks
Gareth
26 matches
Mail list logo