On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 17:41, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <
exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
> > This is on Exim 4.89 in Debian 9.5.
>
>
> Quite likely 31323b3044 - the commit comment for that was
> "Fix log line corruption for DKIM status".
>
>
> Could also be d342446f29 - the note for that reads
>
Hi,
I'm sometimes seeing some corrupted output in my Exim logs when verifying
DKIM signatures, for example:
2018-08-21 11:56:58 1fs4LJ-0001VN-G3 DKIM: d=email.tladoonline.com
s=10dkim1 c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha256 b=2048
i=+Ud^A^DV?<9E> W
Sometimes I get something more valid like this:
2018
On 3 January 2014 09:04, Anant wrote:
> I have tried that one earlier but it is not working for me, smtp_banner
> will change the message when we was trying to take the telnet, not
> effecting Email header.
>
Anant,
You want the received_header_text option that I mentioned in the first
reply.
On 2 January 2014 12:20, Anant wrote:
> I am using exim 4.72 , installed from yum repo, Now I want to remove Exim
> version (*(Exim 4.72)*)from the Email header.
Look at the received_header_text option:
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-main_configuration.html#SECTalo
On 16 December 2011 09:45, John Burnham wrote:
> >
> > I need a script, or help doing one.
> >
> > I need a script that sends me an email when qeue is bigger than 2.500
> > emails.
> >
> > Can anyone help me ?
> >
> Totally untested and before I've finished my coffee, but here's some
> pseudo code
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 07:57, an...@iguanait.com wrote:
> As i read and checked in the net, this can happen because rejected
> connections from the remot stmp server, then system retry sending of
> messages. Also can be caused from corrupted exim database.
>
> I read in the net for this solution
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 00:40, Eric Cross wrote:
> Our mailserver (non-Exim..it's Kerio 6.6.2) is experiencing a consistent and
> repeatable smtp banner delay when connecting to Exim 4.69 mail servers.
> When telnet'ing from our outbound MTA to port 25 on four different Exim 4.69
> domains/servers
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 16:15, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone who knows the code will comment on the detail, but since
> there's no opportunity in the SMTP protocol for a server to abort the
> reception of the DATA portion of a message mid-stream (other than
> rudely hanging up, I
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:18, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An alternative is to get all users to export their entire mailbox to a
> local PST and then re-import that into your new IMAP server using
> Outlook.
If you go down this route you can automate this:
- If you're using Exc
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 19:20, Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That doesn't resolve the problem for email originating on the exim
> server; exim doesn't (at least using the configurations I understand)
> attempt delivery through the MX record for email originating on the
> exim server. It
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 17:00, Conrad Lawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My employer is planning on migrating from Sendmail (Linux) to Exchange
> 2007. We also have an SMTP gateway server running the Exim 4 (Linux). This
> gateway server also does spam filtering (Spamassassin) and virus blockin
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 13:38, Michelle Konzack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > 2) SA says what it is MUCH faster.
>> >
>>
>> If you are concerned about calling the command 'spamassassin' several
>> times, I have to inform you that exim connects to the SpamAssassin
>> daemon just like spamc does,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 04:24, 91change <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i need a server .Becos i need to send mail when its connected to internet .
> If offline ,it should queue all emails
Is the intention to accept and deliver mail on behalf of other hosts,
or is it just for mail generated locally
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:50, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> However, if all that is required is relaying, then perhaps you might
>> look beyond sendmail and exim, and find something that is simpler and
>> doesn't have the features and complexity. Looking through the Debian
>> package l
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 07:10, 91change k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to know the footprint size of exim and sendmail . I am
> working on for relay server in embedded paltform . I need the thinner of
> these two .
>
> Can you tell me which is having lesser size ?
>
> Is there any opt
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:48 AM, ROGERS Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On my Exchange 2000 box, the callout works - Exchange rejects
> > syntactically invalid sender addresses at SMTP time. It also rejects
> > syntactically invalid
> > recipient addresses at SMTP time, but accepts and the
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/05/2008, Phil Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2 May 2008 09:01:22 +0100 Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > snip snip
> > > This might help:
> > >
> > > verify = recipient/callout=use_
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Ted Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ROGERS Richard wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I have just seen examples of mail with a sender address whith the
> >> local part ending with a dot:
> [snip]
> > I added the following ACLs to our configs to avoid p
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > The freshclam daemon obviously locked the database long enough for
> > clamd
> > to time out retrying to obtain a lock on the DB. So it ended itself.
>
> Same here.
>
> One thing I wonder - with the following setting:
>
>
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Tao Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using Exim 3.36 under Debain. I am keep getting this message
> from my exim server. How can I remove the delay message from the exim?
Tao,
That is a very old (and unsupported) version of Exim, but the
documentation can
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Andy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the responces, the squirrelmail option sounds really interesting
> and ill look into this further.
> All in all tho, everyone is very negative/cautious regarding the idea in
> principal. A huge proportion of th
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks, it is a pity it is pass-protected.
>
> Erm... I don't think it is - at least, I can view the archives without
> being logged in. I haven't got any cookies hiding away, either, for the
> domain in question.
M
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Terry Calie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a catchall address, but want to block certain addresses that get
> nothing but large amounts of spam.
>
> I tried adding the following "verify_only" condition, that checks for a
> user file, and then looks in the fi
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >2. The name and address or other info regarding the author/maintainer of
> > >the domain exim.info?
> >
> > Yes, exactly.
>
> Are you sure that's what you're asking? Because you've been told that
> information 4 or
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Yves Goergen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So as you were so kind to squal on me, do you have any solid reasons why
> today (in the year 2008) anybody would need a postmaster mailbox? I
> guess you have never used a postmaster address in your life nor looked
> i
On 31/10/2007, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > deny local_parts = /some/file
> That did not work but this did.
>
> # deny email addresses listed in file
> deny recipients = lsearch;/etc/virtual/blocked_email
>
> But it gives a bounce error like so:
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
On 03/09/07, Martin A. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've finally got round to updating my searchable exim docs to 4.68 -
> sorry it took so long.
>
> http://www.hinterlands.org/cgi-bin/swish.cgi
>
> This isn't Google, nor is it as good as Google, but it does mean that
> you're searching _on
On 23/08/07, Jan-Piet Mens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But why would you want to accept and silently discard mail? If the mail
> > contains a virus, don't you think it's better that the sender is told so?
>
> No! That causes collateral spam! Think faked sender...
Not if you're rejecting duri
On 07/05/07, Arne Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also this woman is crossposting on the courier list.
That doesn't seem entirely unreasonable.
john
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with t
On 28/03/07, Martin A. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ronan McGlue wrote:
> > So i need to peel of the forwarding encapsulation in exim, how feasible
> > is this, and how accurate will it be to the original message?!
> The way we do this is to present an IMAP server with a shared folder
> in
On 21/03/07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure enough, this is a spammer (the "gb30472" local part has never
> existed at my domain; it's part of a mutt message-ID that is listed on
> lists.debian.org). When this happens (a host disconnecting without
> properly saying goodbye after
On 11/22/06, Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mine seems to be using the forwardfile driver, which doesn't like the
> > local_part_suffix options. I tried setting my configuration to use the
> > redirect driver and exim complains that it cannot find director driver
> > "redirect".
> >
>
On 11/9/06, Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Using exim_tidydb as described in the manual will reduce the data within
> > the files, but may not reduce the actual or apparent size of the files
> > (I am unsure of this, but unless exim_tidydb removes and rewrites the
> > file it is v
On 11/4/06, Peter Velan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Will windoze execute a file that ends in dot-space-space-space-exe ?
> >> dosent the os see this as NOT ending in .exe
> >
> > I think that windows will happily exec the file, but I don't have a
> > machine to test on.
>
> You are right - Wi
On 11/4/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Will windoze execute a file that ends in dot-space-space-space-exe ?
> > dosent the os see this as NOT ending in .exe
>
> I think that windows will happily exec the file, but I don't have a
> machine to test on.
Under both Windows XP SP2 an
On 10/21/06, gdub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any thoughts on the idea of dedicating a
> host or interface as a trap by giving it
> the lowest priority MX record?
I have a second IP on the same interface as my primary MX and in the
same /29, so if someone connects to it, then there really is no
On 10/10/06, Michael J. Tubby G8TIC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with a local implementation (in library code) of zmalloc that looks like:
>
> void * zmalloc(size_t size)
> {
>void * p = malloc(size);
>if (p)
>memset(p, 0, size);
>return p;
> }
I'm in the habit of just using c
On 7/25/06, Lukas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this may be a newbye question but I really need an help.
> I am trying to fight the last type of spam, the one in which the
> spammers use typos to fool spamassassin.
> So I am trying, without success, to write a rule for the System Filter
> to
On 6/4/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have found something, too, using a variable called acl_VAR_SOMETHING
> >but Exim would only tell me it doesn't understand what I mean.
>
> You really need to familiarize yourself with the tool you're using by
> reading the excellent available d
On 6/4/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm running SpamAssassin in the data ACL. I have the following in my
> >ACLS that adds a modified subject header:
> >
> > warn message = X-Local-NewSubject: [spam $spam_score] $h_Subject:
> >condition = ${if >{$spam_score_int}{50}{1}{0}}
On 6/3/06, Yves Goergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to make my users aware of the new spam filter service and make
> them find an appropriate spam score threshold to deny incoming mails at.
> There is already added a X-Spam-Score header to all incoming mails but
> most of the users probabl
On 6/1/06, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have a requirement to build a large queue of messages using the
> > queue_only option and then have them released in small batches by a
> > number of subsequent queue runners.
>
> exim -bp | sed '/^/d;/^$/d;s/^.\{10\}\(.\{17\}\).*/\1/' |
On 5/25/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Pat Hastings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060525 17:31]:
> > When the migration is finished (about 8 hours) the plan is to set the
> > forwarding ip address to the new mailserver. This should then allow the
> > all the emails to be delivered.
>
> Ma
On 5/24/06, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If we give you an account on the server, are you willing to do the heavy
> > lifting? :-)
>
> It'd be an honour. I think I have perfected my script now. Since it runs DB
> queries directly, it can set the report dates according to the Wish
On 5/15/06, Alastair Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sascha wrote:
> > As already pointed out: It's time to get rid of the catchall.
> > It's bad karma ;)
>
> I'm afraid it's too late, I've used it over the last 5 years, and didn't
> keep track of all the addresses used.
I had the same pr
On 4/15/06, W B Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>If I'm mail and I run sudo it asks for the root password. What do I need
> >>to add to get around that?
> >
> >
> > See NOPASSWD in man sudoers.
> ??
>
> Is that a good idea?
>
> I think I am beginning to see why some folks say Linux is no
> m
On 4/15/06, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I'm mail and I run sudo it asks for the root password. What do I need
> to add to get around that?
See NOPASSWD in man sudoers.
regards,
John
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://w
On 4/15/06, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You could configure sudo to allow mail to run iptables as root without
> > a password.
> It's not quite that simple. The OS allows me to run iptables but when
> iptables runs it responds with:
>
> iptables v1.3.0: can't initialize iptables ta
On 4/15/06, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trying a load reduction trick which I will share if it works. Running
> into a little snag and this is probably simple but I need to get user
> mail to run iptables that requires user root to run, and without havinf
> to use a password to do it.
On 3/26/06, Jaap Winius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would be the best way to pre-process incoming messages? By this I
> mean that I'd like to single out certain messages and run one or more
> search-and-replace routines over them before they're delivered.
>
> For instance, I could write a pe
On 3/2/06, Phil Pennock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I understand that exim gets the command "AUTH LOGIN" and then sends
> > the prompt "Username:" ("VXNlcm5hbWU6" base64 encoded); this is fine
> > and exactly what exim should do. The next thing exim does is send the
> > message "501 Invalid bas
On 2/8/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm running Exim 4.52 with SA 3.1 and Clamav 0.87 on a machine with
> > only 256MB RAM quite happily, albeit with some careful limitations on
> > the number of SA child processes.
>
> would you share with me on what your settings are? Th
On 2/8/06, Mike Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However I did notice that the memory usage slowly went down to only 8MB free
> with some swap space being used (The server has 512MB), so I have a feeling
> I'm going to get the same problem at some point.
Be careful how you interpret these figur
On 1/25/06, John Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/25/06, Jakob Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I guess this can easily be fixed by running sa-learn as root rather
> > > than mail, but I wanted to get to the bottom of why I exim's access to
>
On 1/25/06, Jakob Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I guess this can easily be fixed by running sa-learn as root rather
> > than mail, but I wanted to get to the bottom of why I exim's access to
> > the Bayes database is assumed to be root.
>
> Exim simply passes the username to spamd, you can
Hi,
Recently I think I've discovered that my SpamAssassin autolearning has
not been working, because exim and sa-learn have been modifiying the
bayes database as different users. This is with SA 3.1 and Exim 4.60.
The relevant stanza from my data ACL is as follows:
# put headers in all message
On 13/01/06, Alan J. Flavell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's no need to check whether a 1 MB message is spam.
>
> I can't really confirm that diagnosis. Practically all messages >=1MB
> which get to *me*, I would categorise as spam[1], but, across our user
> population, there are both spam
On 12/01/06, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 22:08 +0100, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> > I've just compiled Exim for the WRT54GS !
>
> > The WRT54GS can spool up to 20MB of mails, and much more if you have a 'SD
> > card mod'.
>
> That's sick! :)
>
> I'm really dubiou
On 12/01/06, Slawomir Orlowski (CYMPAK) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have exim 4.6 and SpamAssassin 3.1 on Linux RH7.2.
>
> I have would like to have my Subject changed if e-mail contains spam
> ($spam_score >5)
>
> my configure file:
> "
> warn spam = mail:true
> message = X-Spam_score: $spam_s
On 14/12/05, Clive McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If users create rules in Outlook, they are generally stored
> > and run on the server. The only rules that do not are those
> > that do things like save messages to local PST files, i.e.
> > access local resources not available to the serv
On 13/12/05, Clive McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Out of interest, we currently use spamassassin to tag incoming
> messages with a spam score. Users can then set up exim filters on
> their unix based imap mailbox to decide what level to accept/reject
> messages as spam. They can also set up
On 13/12/05, Jan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >But you don't get a mail client that can add proper In-Reply-To and
> >References header fields, which where standardised over 20 years ago,
> >and instead screw up the threading in the mail clients of the rest of us!
> >
> >I rest my case.
On 16/11/05, Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's the way it is because people (in the early days) wanted a working
> configuration that was highly commented so that newcomers could read it
> and perhaps understand the way it worked. Perhaps this has turned into
> overkill?
If you don't
On 15/11/05, Shea Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Although be warned that a number of sites are blocking (or at least
> >running SpamAssassin rules that mark down) senders on dynamic IP
> >addresses. If you want to send e-mail directly, you should get an ISP
> >who can give you a static IP in
On 15/11/05, Shea Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your connections to hotmail are consistently timing out. Are you
> > running your server on a residential DSL line? My guess is that your
> > ISP is blocking outgoing port 25. I stopped using Sympatico years ago
> > when they abruptly star
On 09/11/05, Dave Restall - System Administrator,,, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been running Exim on Debian for a few years and apart from the
> initial install, I have always used an in-house version built from source.
> I have seen a few messages on this list regarding problems with Exim
On 27/09/05, Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (2) to invoke my spam scanner, Exiscan/ClamAV
> > deny message= VIRUS FOUND : ($malware_name)
> >malware= *
> >demime = *
> >
> > questions:
> >
> > (ii) per the spec,
> >
> > "Clamd does not seem to unpack
On 24/08/05, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:03 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 16:05 +1200, Craig Whitmore wrote:
> > > Umm. SPF will do MUCH better and will not give false positives
> >
> > You're new here, aren't you
>
> Evide
On 22/08/05, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > randomize_recs=(on|off);
> > If this option is turned on, pdnsd will randomly reorder the cached
> > records of one type when creating an answer. This supports round-robin
> > DNS schemes and increases fail safety for hosts with multiple IP
>
On 22/08/05, Andreas Steinmetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just tried restarting pdnsd and the message has now been delivered
> > successfully to one of the other hosts. I really should have run
> > tcpdump and see what was being returned before restarting it.
> >
> > So it seems to have been
On 22/08/05, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm running a caching DNS server, but it does return all 9 hosts for
> > this record.
>
> Very odd. Have you double-checked the resolv.conf that Exim is using? What
> name server software are you using?
I'm running pdnsd on my local interfac
On 22/08/05, Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, John Hall wrote:
> > There is only one MX record, oxmail.ox.ac.uk. This name resolves to
> > many IP addresses, one of which is unavailable:
> > > You haven't provided enough inf
On 22/08/05, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is supposed to be Exim's behaviour a mail host has multiple A
> > records, and one of the machines is unavailable.
>
> It ought to immediately try the other hosts, in MX priority order, so
> long as there isn't an unreasonable number of
Hi,
What is supposed to be Exim's behaviour a mail host has multiple A
records, and one of the machines is unavailable. There is currently a
message on my queue destined for ox.ac.uk.
$ host -t mx ox.ac.uk
ox.ac.ukMX 9 oxmail.ox.ac.uk
$host oxmail.ox.ac.uk
oxmail.ox.ac.uk
On 09/08/05, Geraint Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been busy of late, so my analysis has not been as thorough
> as I had hoped, so apologies if the below is brief.
>
> John Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
> (on Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 04:0
On 28/07/05, Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I posted this problem a few weeks ago, but received no response, so
> > I'm reposting it.
> I've been away; was this ever sorted out?
Phil,
No - I haven't got any further with it.
Thanks,
John
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/m
Hi,
I posted this problem a few weeks ago, but received no response, so
I'm reposting it.
I have a perl script that runs as a pipe transport and injects two
e-mails back into the system via BSMTP. Up until a recent upgrade from
Woody to Sarge this all worked fine. Now, when injecting the second
m
On 22/06/05, Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I note, however, that there is a db_upgrade utility, which should be
> pointed out to people. (Though it doesn't seem to be installed on my
> Gentoo Linux system.)
On Debian it is called db3_upgrade and is part of the libdb3_util
package, whi
Hi,
I have a perl script that runs as a pipe transport and injects two
e-mails back into the system via BSMTP. Up until a recent upgrade from
Woody to Sarge this all worked fine. Now, when injecting the second
message, my script hangs when closing the file descriptor to exim. The
perl looks someth
79 matches
Mail list logo
