Kamil Jońca writes:
> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
>
>> On 06/06/2022 19:46, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>>> Failed to create child process
>>
>> This would be the response from the OS to a request
>> to fork a process. Are you running in
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
> On 06/06/2022 19:46, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> Failed to create child process
>
> This would be the response from the OS to a request
> to fork a process. Are you running in a constrained
> environment?
It is rather "
I have strange thing,
I found that some mails sends by logcheck are delayed.
After some digging I found that:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
echo bla |sudo -u logcheck mail root
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
makes this erro
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
> Doh. I am so stupid.
>
> I finally looked at the docs for the pipe transport, and there is the
> answer staring at me.
>
>
> ===
> message_suffixUse: pipe Type: string† Default: see below
>
> The string specified here
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users writes:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> >> hd ~/Maildir/new/1654092174.M969837P1180197.alfa.kjonca
>> >> 0180 45 6e 63 6f 64 69 6e 67 3a 20 38 62 69 74 0a 4d |Encoding:
>>
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users writes:
> Hello.
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 06:13:53PM +0200, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users writes:
>> > Post here output of "hd /tmp/exim-... | tail", pls. And similar hexdump
&g
Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users writes:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 04:15:18PM +0200, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> %dpkg -S /usr/bin/bsd-mailx
>> bsd-mailx: /usr/bin/bsd-mailx
>
> Strace of Debian bsd-mailx (my version is 8.1.2-0.20180807cvs-2)
> shows that it
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
> On 01/06/2022 04:42, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> - "mail" command is the same in both cases.
>
> Obviously since one case runs exim and the other postfix, they cannot be.
--8<---cut here---st
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
> On 31/05/2022 15:39, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users writes:
>>> Is this a blank line after every real line or just the last one ?
>> Last one.
>> As I wrote elsewhere postfix did not a
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
> On 31/05/2022 14:28, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> I have some instances, which generates mail from stdin
>> (ie something like "echo bla|mail root")
>> and recently I found that there exists additional empty line i
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users writes:
>
> Is this a blank line after every real line or just the last one ?
Last one.
As I wrote elsewhere postfix did not add this.
KJ
--
http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## E
Bill Cole via Exim-users writes:
> On 2022-05-31 at 09:28:38 UTC-0400 (Tue, 31 May 2022 15:28:38 +0200)
> Kamil Jońca via Exim-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> I have some instances, which generates mail from stdin
>> (ie something like "echo bla|mail root&q
I have some instances, which generates mail from stdin
(ie something like "echo bla|mail root")
and recently I found that there exists additional empty line in such
emails, ie instead of
--8<---cut here---start->8---
bla
--8<---cut here-
Graeme Fowler via Exim-users writes:
> On 17 Oct 2018, at 12:38, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users
> wrote:
[...]
>
> frequent queue runners, I reckon. Changing the fork delivery model is
> not likely to be something that happens quickly at all!
I never suggest that. :) L. Poet
Graeme Fowler via Exim-users writes:
> On 16 Oct 2018, at 18:03, Ian Zimmerman via Exim-users
> wrote:
>> I think this is a misunderstanding both on the part of Lennart and on
>> the part of Graeme.
>
> I’m not so sure that it is; I was addressing the very specific example given.
Well. I was a
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
> On 16/10/2018 12:44, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
>>
>> [..]
>>> It does seem somewhat... arrogant of systemd to assume that
>>> when a process it has started
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
[..]
> It does seem somewhat... arrogant of systemd to assume that
> when a process it has started terminates, any of its children
Ahem. :)
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/10299
KJ
--
http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/
P-K4
--
## List detail
19:11, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users
> wrote:
>> After discussion on systemd list we have conclusions:
>> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2018/10/msg00054.html
>> and thread
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2018-September/041395.html
>> )
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes:
> On 24/09/2018 14:25, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> assume we have service file /etc/systemd/system/mailtest.service:
>>
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> [Unit]
>> Descrip
(This is repost of
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2018-September/041393.html
as Lennart Poettering suggest this)
It is something strange with sending mails from systemd system service:
assume we have service file /etc/systemd/system/mailtest.service:
--8<---cut
20 matches
Mail list logo
