Re: [exim] localhost problem

2010-02-26 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 schrieb gourav saini: > can i set the primary_hostname = example.com > > but its not working > pls help qualify_domain -- Regards, Kerstin -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Pleas

Re: [exim] DKIM error (acl_smtp_dkim) in panic_log - Exim 4.71

2010-02-03 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2010 schrieb Rainer Kemme: > Hello Exim users! > > Since my update to Exim 4.71 I'm using DKIM. DKIM signing works as well > as DKIM verification. But sometimes I get message in the panic_log like > this one: > > 2010-02-02 09:01:01 Exim configuration error in line 131 of

Re: [exim] dkim error in paniclog

2009-12-18 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2009 schrieb Tom Kistner: [...] > > Looking through the code, these are the most likely causes for the > failures: > > 1) The message has more than 512 headers. > 2) The message contains a single line longer than 16k bytes. > That's it! Thank's al lot for this inform

Re: [exim] dkim error in paniclog

2009-12-17 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Donnerstag 03 Dezember 2009 schrieb Kerstin Espey: > Hi all, > > after upgrading to exim 4.71 we get the following error in paniclog: > > 2009-12-02 22:06:05 1NFwOj-0005JP-2X DKIM: Error while running this message > through validation, disabling signature verification. >

Re: [exim] dkim error in paniclog

2009-12-04 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Donnerstag 03 Dezember 2009 schrieb Tom Kistner: [...] > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have access to the headers, as the mails get > > delivered to our customers. > > Can you send me the envelope sender for a few of those samples, or > better, log the DKIM-Signature header and send that to me?

[exim] dkim error in paniclog

2009-12-03 Thread Kerstin Espey
Hi all, after upgrading to exim 4.71 we get the following error in paniclog: 2009-12-02 22:06:05 1NFwOj-0005JP-2X DKIM: Error while running this message through validation, disabling signature verification. 2009-12-03 00:36:35 1NFykN-0007Js-6B DKIM: Error while running this message through val

Re: [exim] Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease

2009-10-15 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Donnerstag 15 Oktober 2009 schrieb Tom Kistner: > Frank Elsner wrote: > >> * PCRE removed from Exim distribution. You will need > >>a separate PCRE library (and matching headers) to > >>compile Exim. > > > > Any pointer to a location where to get it? > > There's a very good chance that y

Re: [exim] Mimicing Postfix configs?

2009-09-22 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Dienstag 22 September 2009 schrieb Jan Johansson: > >Probably not the most efficient, but possibly one of the simplest, ways of > >doing this is as follows: > > > >- create lists of local-parts, one per domain, e.g. > > That is exactly what I want to avoid, because we are talking about _many_ >

Re: [exim] desire for free case

2007-08-09 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Mittwoch 08 August 2007 14:45 schrieb Michael Sprague: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:42:19PM -0700, Robert Van Horn wrote: > > Hi, I have users that would prefer to ignore case in > > their email addresses. tiffany would like to be able to > > receive email as Tiffany, or tiFfany for that matter.

Re: [exim] nested condition for authentication

2006-12-05 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Montag 04 Dezember 2006 12:20 schrieb Jakob Hirsch: [...] > $3 is not used in LOGIN and therefore always empty. You probably copied > that from a PLAIN authenticator and forgot to change the last two lines > to $1 and $2. Wow, that's the trick. :-) > > Testing with -d+expand could have helped y

[exim] nested condition for authentication

2006-12-04 Thread Kerstin Espey
Hi list, something goes wrong with this authenticator: begin authenticators login: driver = plaintext public_name= LOGIN server_prompts = "Username:: : Password::" server_condition = ${if and { \ { or { \ { eq {$2}{${lookup{$1}dbm{/etc/exim4/authpwd.db \

Re: [exim] delay with ratelimit

2006-01-24 Thread Kerstin Espey
Am Montag, 23. Januar 2006 11:49 schrieb Tony Finch: > Er, yes, that's probably a documentation bug. Try wrapping $sender_rate > like this > ${sg {$sender_rate_limit} {[.].*} {} } > Thank you! This one works fine for me: delay = ${eval: ${sg {$sender_rate} {[.].*} {} } - $sender_rate_limi

[exim] delay with ratelimit

2006-01-23 Thread Kerstin Espey
Hi, I have updated to exim 4.60 for the use of the ratelimit condition. Reading the spec.txt, I found this example: # Slow down fast senders warn ratelimit = 100 / 1h / per_rcpt / strict delay = ${eval: $sender_rate - $sender_rate_limit }s I can't get this working, because $sender_rate