esm...@wp.pl wrote:
Would you like to help me, how solve this problem?
Interesting fact:
From oldstable debian etch I can send message from wan network.
Let's as Queen: kind of magic.
Next debian 6.0 should be called Magic :)
You should probably take this to the debian mailing list.
-
Marc Sherman wrote:
There is no ACL in which both $domain and $message_size can be used
together -- $domain is only valid in a RCPT acl, because it's a
per-address variable, and $message_size is only valid in the DATA acl
for obvious reasons.
... so to implement what you want, you'll
Rob Morris wrote:
server_condition= {if
exists{/var/mail/sites/${domain:${2}}/.accounts}\
{if
crypteq{$3}{\{md5\}${lookup{$2}lsearch{/var/mail/sites/${domain:${2}}/.accounts}}}{1}{0}}\
{false}}
Your condition syntax
Neil Nunez wrote:
Hello,
I want a sample config of a per user spamassassin in exim.
I know that this must be in transport section, but I want a sample to
accomplish this.
You do not need to resort to transport level scanning to do this.
bo...@tagnet.ru wrote:
Hello!
I have a strange problem with plaintext authenticators. It looks like auto
domain qualify. Authenticator configuration:
PLAIN:
driver = plaintext
server_set_id = $auth2
server_prompts = :
John M Collins wrote:
deny
condition =
${lookup{$h_subject}nwildlsearch{CONFDIR/Bad-subject}{1}{0}}
message= Message subject line $h_subject looks like spam.\n\
Please change subject and resend if not.
Remove the quotes, and add a terminal : to $h_subject:. Header names
Peter Bowyer wrote:
$ doesn't signify a variable, it signifies an expansion. The use of $
when assigning an acl variable would be inconsistent with this.
Same goes for the def: operator, as highlighted in the OP's picture.
Exim's syntax is actually quite internally consistent.
- Marc
--
Andres Lucena wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting the Unrouteable address error (this must be a classic)
when I try to send to remote mail accounts. I don't receive anything
so when I look to the log (tail -f /var/log/exim4/mainlog) I get this:
andresluc...@gmail.com: Unrouteable address
1) You
Frank Elsner wrote:
Happy New Year,
I've the problem to understand the following log entries
2009-01-09 17:07:39 1LLJmD-0005RX-VI = x...@bronto.tubit.tu-berlin.de U=
P=local S=6074 T=Cron x...@bronto /usr/local/sbin/Backup from
x...@bronto.tubit.tu-berlin.de for
2009-01-09
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On 9 Jan 2009, at 16:20, Frank Elsner wrote:
QT=7m39s DT=0s from 17:07:39 17:07:40 ?
The queue time starts when exim is first called - in this case between
the initial exec of exim, and stdin closing (ie end of the message)
was 7m39s
7m38s, actually --
Eli Sand wrote:
Are you certain? There are 3 log entries there. The first is cron
submitting the message (= input message). The second entry is Exim dealing
the the message for delivery saying that it sat in queue for 7m39s and
delivery time took 0s. The third entry is saying the message
Eli Sand wrote:
Yeah, I noticed that just after posting and seeing Nigels response. Now I
see why it's so weird - why would cron take almost 8m to send a message that
was less than 6k in size? It seems like there's an issue with the backup
script or cron.
It's probably a long running cron
Gaurav Pruthi wrote:
Dear All,
I want to know for what reasons, mail deferred (DNS resolution/Host SMTP
Down) and when delivering after 7 mins what denotes asterisk with IP
[xx.xx.xx.xx]*
First of all, please do no obfuscate your logs when posting to this list.
The logs you posted are
Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
This works, and works great. However, it takes FOREVER to happen. I
setup Thunderbird to use authentication and when I send a message, it
takes sometimes more then 30 seconds to ask for the password. Once I
enter the password, the message is sent immediately. I
windy_1 wrote:
I have tried everything in the docs that appeared to relate as in
untrusted_set_sender = *
???
do I sent that to
untrusted_set_sender = bugzilla at at virtualinstruments.com
No, you want untrusted_set_sender = www_data.
That means that the www_data user account (which is
Terry wrote:
Hi Richard spamassasin is now catching it since i removed my self from
the whitelist cant beleave I did that
2008-12-21 18:22:57 1LESx5-0009ne-I2 = te...@firstkmh.co.uk
H=(62-30-39-110.cable.ubr02.wiga.blueyonder.co.uk) [62.30.39.110]:4254
I=[217.112.92.232]:25 P=esmtp
Gerard Hooton wrote:
Which config file do I set the max connections, I have a split config
That's a question for the debian mailing list. Split config isn't
supported here.
- Marc
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Ted Cooper wrote:
Do you have any features or critical bugs in mind that require a new
release?
The only one I can think of is the updated SPF library. I was going to
look at it to see what changes were needed inside exim but work kept me
busy doing other things.
Have the dkim patches
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hello list,
My knowledge of Exim got rusty a bit:)
I'd like to achieve two conditions within exim:
1. I'd like to force all local senders (+relay_from_hosts) to
authenticate before they can send out mail
Just remove any mention of +relay_from_hosts from your
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Bounces should only be sent if the receiver knows they'll be usefully
delivered. This is code for: Don't sent bounces when your system
rejects spam or virus traffic, or you'll become an Internet pariah.
That sounds nice in theory. But how can you ever in a sane
Robert Nicholson wrote:
Now whilst this regular expression is quite convoluted even if I just
put $header_from: does not match windows it still doesn't match
Can anybody tell me why that's the case?
In my case I don't want to copy mail with foreign charsets etc into
the backup
Brent Clark wrote:
Hi
Keep getting this message from this one MTA
TLS error on connection from removed.co.uk (mail.removed.co.uk)
[1.2.3.4] (gnutls_handshake): A TLS packet with unexpected length was
received.
Im running Exim 4.69-6 (debian testing).
I cant for the likes of me
Sander Smeenk wrote:
Great! Can we stop quoting urls listed on surbl? All these mails end up
in my spambox as they score below the drop treshold and above the
spamtreshold.
You really should whitelist any mailing list you subscribe to on the
topic of mail server or spam scanner admin.
-
M. Piscaer wrote:
Hi all,
I try to send an mail to an hotmail adres. The mail is getting relayed
by an exim 4.63 (standard Etch).
The mail is getting delevered to the SPAM folder. I have researched the
problem, i have made an message containing:
You're fighting a losing battle. Hotmail
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 15/07/2008, Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys
I have noticed a very weird problem, users using auto complete in
outlook are getting an error stating Unrouteable address.
The failure point is Outlook, then, which has stored an unrouteable address.
If you
Telly Williams wrote:
Hi,
Problem: Can't change the timezone to MDT from MST.
Tried: Changing to MDT in my configuration and restarting
exim, but then I get my times in UTC. I also tried using -0600
and -0600, to no avail. If I change my timezone to MST, it works,
Marc Perkel wrote:
The bottleneck is the queue and I've noticed that if I use a ram disk
for the queue that I can process many times as much mail with var lower
load levels that using disk based queue. Ideally if I had a battery back
up ram disk card that would be ideal but I can't find
Paul Hayes wrote:
Is there a built-in feature of exim that'll allow me to do this or am I
best off routing the mail to an external perl script to handle it? I
guess the script would keep a counter stored in a file so it knows where
the next email will go.
There's no built in feature
Tom Ray [Lists] wrote:
Thanks. That did it.
Don't just remove control=submission; rather, use the domain= option to
tell it that your auth id includes the domain already. Submission mode
does a number of other important fixups besides the envelope-from fixup.
- Marc
--
## List details
Jens Strohschnitter wrote:
Hi list,
the last 4 days I found the following error in the mainlog of my exim-4.32
installation:
Berkeley DB error: PANIC: fatal region error detected; run recovery
I can't remember that I have changed something on my server last 4 days.
Any mail will be
Simon Faulkner wrote:
Cheers Peter, I appreciate the rationale there but...
I have wrestled with the README.Debian today but I'm here because it's
not worked for me :-)
I'm kinda hoping someone here will say Oh yeah, just bang a router and
transport in x/y/z.abc and run
Marc Perkel wrote:
Just a thought
You extract the registrar barrier part of the host name and the same for
the helo. Many hosts that send good email this would match. For example
yahoo.com would have yahoo.com in both the host and the helo.
Then after tracking these and developing
David Woodhouse wrote:
(Also, rejecting for SPF fail is particularly 'brave'. I'd recommend
googling for 'sender address forgery' and reading the first link that
Google shows up.)
I'm on your side here, but don't you think demonstrating your own google
rank is a bit disingenuous? :)
- Marc
Florian Weimer wrote:
Communigate Pro (at least in some versions) does not cope very well
with TLS advertisements. If this server software tries to submit a
message to one of our hosts (which advertises STARTTLS during EHLO),
it aborts the delivery attempt during the TLS handshake. The nasty
Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
stryker9603 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mi 02 Apr 2008 18:49:23 CEST):
after that I ran dpkg -r exim4 and dpkg-p exim4 then reinstalled exim4.
upon reinstall it did not go through configuration like it should. and It
did not make the directory /etc/exim4 so I created
Erin Spiceland wrote:
I'm using cPanel/WHM on a shared hosting server. My clients can
configure their own mail forwarders, but I want to disallow forwarders
to AOL since this frequently results in my server IP getting blacklisted.
This is not a cPanel/WHM group, so people here don't know
Erin Spiceland wrote:
I'm referring to mail redirects, or forwarders, contained in the
/etc/valiases/* files which have been discussed on this list many times,
according to this lists archives.
I'm out.
- Marc
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
Ted Cooper wrote:
Oops .. I was going to fix that page a while back and then got swamped
at work. Looks like theres a few items it needs to cover ;)
Marc Haber, do you have plans yet to include DKIM support in the
debian-heavy package?
Thanks,
- Marc
--
## List details at
tomcatf14a wrote:
Hi,
My provider has blocked port 25 for outgoing SMTP and I need to send emails
out from the server. How do i go around it? Can i change the default SMTP
outgoing port? How can i do it?
You should use your provider as a smarthost.
- Marc
--
## List details at
Onur Güngören wrote:
Hi Ted,
thanks for your response. You are right was my fault, no excat conf or
debug output. Here is my used confi - file (cutted the retry config part)
1) you still haven't sent any logs or debug output
Yan Seiner wrote:
I am using exim .forward to put all mailist emails into a single lists
file. Now I would like to set up that list file as a ringbuffer, so
that when a new email comes in, an older one drops off. (most maillists
are archived anyway, so there's no point in keeping old
Yan Seiner wrote:
So how do I find emails older than some arbitrary date? I started down
that path, but couldn't find a ready-made way to select emails by date.
formail doesn't do that AFAICT.
Ted's find script is the same way I do it.
- Marc
--
## List details at
Haines Brown wrote:
I have a simple question concerning configuration of exim4, visible
mail name.
One page of the configuration asks for system mail name. My FQDM is
teufel.hartford-hwp.com, and that's what I've been using here with
success.
That configuration is part of the debian
Craig Jackson wrote:
Hi,
At the beginning the data acl, some headers are committed to writing but
are not actually written until after the data acl and thus are not
passed to Spamassassin. But I would like Spamassassin to read these
headers. Is there any way to write those headers before
Martin A. Brooks wrote:
So, if i understand your argument correctly, if the PTR were
z0mgpuppieslolzwpony.antibodymx.net, that would make my
email somehow more likely to be legitimate? How do you know that
z0mgpuppieslolzwpony isn't somehow derived from the IP
Ted Cooper wrote:
So how does one detect if SA isn't working correctly and failing from
inside Exim? I'm already keeping a watch out for it - If it's not
running, a restart of the service is attempted and if that fails, Exim
is killed and I am notified. But if SA is still running and
Ted Cooper wrote:
If you keep the spam = user verb/condition/thingy the same each time
it is called (just keeping the user the same, you can add/remove the
true bit), the result is cached and only calls SA once so it's no less
efficient than any of other condition. I use it for a yes/no
Johann Spies wrote:
I have the following in the exim configuration:
# reject messages that score more than 8
deny message = Message viewed as spam
# (snipped)
hosts = ! +relay_from_hosts
spam = spamd:true
condition = ${if
Karl Fischer wrote:
I'm using exim for nearly three years now and found my way through
the config and that stuff, however, getting to the newest version
is still painful each time ...
I'm still running sarge (will upgrade to etch with the next server
box in a few weeks) but I had lot's of
Veit Hailperin wrote:
I've set up a file in conf.d/transport/ called 30_exim4-config_cyrus_delivery
having a definition for cyrus_delivery in that file.
You seem to be using Debian's exim configuration files. You might have
better luck getting help on the debian mailing lists.
- Marc
--
W B Hacker wrote:
Aside from ascertaining if the 'wisher' can even afford the initial cost
to *start* implementing their plan, and over what period of time it is
expected to ramp to that magical 50,000 per-second level, defining
appropriate technology dictates that you need to know what
Michael da Silva Pereira wrote:
Still no luck :(
I've done this now to the transport:
catchallmailbox:
driver = appendfile
directory = ${lookup mysql {SELECT `maildir` FROM
`courier`.`mailboxes` WHERE `user` = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$domain}'
LIMIT 1}}
Is it possible to configure submission mode so that the return path of a
message is set to the $authenticated_id, but there is no Sender: header
created?
I'd like to trust my users to set whatever From: address they like, but
still ensure that bounces go to the authenticated sender address. But
Marc Silver wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a host running exim 4.68 that handles mail for the
discoverylink.co.za domain. Since this past weekend I have started seeing
the following in my rejectlogs:
2008-02-05 11:17:49 SMTP protocol synchronization error (next input sent
too soo
n:
Craig Jackson wrote:
Not
realizing that those networks were broken into subnetworks (ARIN doesn't
give that information), using Exim acls, email from those entire
networks, plus a long list of networks in the US and Canada, are made to
wait too long - 600s. Almost all spam disconnects
Peter Kirk wrote:
2008-02-07 12:44:25 [18647] unexpected disconnection while reading
SMTP command from (peterkilap) [x.x.x.x]:3564 I=[x.x.x.x]:25 (error:
Operation timed out)
hostlist = removed
hostlist reserve_hosts = removed
hostlist relay_from_hosts = removed
domainlist
It would be handy (and clean up some of my configs) if exim had an
expansion condition that mirrored the behaviour of the condition option
on routers and acls -- that is, it takes a single expansion parameter,
and returns false if the parameter is empty, 0, no, or false, and
returns true
Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Ted,
yeah appologies, I did mangle the email address I posted, good to know
this is done automatically by the list
and in any future messages I may post Ill will not mess with the
information. Domian.net isnt the domain I was
attempting to email, and the address
Phil Chambers wrote:
I have been using a printed copy of the 4.50 documentation for a long time
because of the time and paper needed print a newer version. This is the
trigger for me to pull my finger out.
Thanks John for your reply and sorry to have wasted your time.
If you want to
David Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
Recently (Mid-January 2008) Hotmail has developed some intermittent
delivery problem with email being
sent through our server.
* A new message to a hotmail address is discarded by Hotmail and never
shown to the user
* A reply to a message - to a hotmail address
W B Hacker wrote:
Give a man a fire, and he will be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
So _that's_ why these RTFM discussions keep devolving into flamewars!
:)
- Marc
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
WJCarpenter wrote:
I think I used to know the answer to this, but I was just looking at
section 10 of the exim spec and didn't find the info I was looking
for. (Treatment of various other things is laid out pretty well, but
not this case.)
If you have a wildcard host name item in a
John Schmerold wrote:
For the record, I'm not faking traffic for Gmail - using that as a
fictional example.
Please don't obfuscate; as you can see it just wastes everyone's time
trying to figure out your broken examples instead of helping you solve
your actual problem. Obfuscating with a
Toth Milan wrote:
Marc, thanks a lot for you reply. but I'm in situation that I can't
edit the php scripts because its obfuscated. Can you please tell how
to do it in exim? Thanks a lot ..
The PHP script doesn't need to be edited. You have to configure the user
running that script as a
Toth Milan wrote:
Hello to all,
I'm very new to exim and I would like to ask you, how to rewrite
sender of outgoing e-mails. I have a php application which is sending
emails without smtp auth. There is 2 e-mail addresses in php
application which is sending e-mail. One is [EMAIL
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ${if def:h_from:{${address:$h_from:}}fail} Ffs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ${if eq {${address:$h_from:}}{}
{fail}{${address:$h_from:}} }
Those aren't the same thing. fail is a directive instructing expansion
of the if to fail. {fail} is the literal string
Frank Scholl wrote:
thanks alot marc, sender_retain was the option i needed, since people
log in with their $domain and $localpart set from a database behind.
great and fast help!
I'd strongly recommend control=submission/domain= instead. sender_retain
lets the sender spoof the envelope
Frank Scholl wrote:
hello list,
i have set up a mail system for virtual domains as well as for
localhost mail. at the moment i am struggling at a probably easy to
solve problem. the envelope address gets build in a way that makes it
troublesome to communicate with other smtps when
Leonardo Boselli wrote:
I (or better my server) does not bounce around: just has a rule that if
the two main servers (that offer pop3 and imap service to users,
an that act as smarthosts for local users) cannot
send directly within 5 minutes, to save CPU cycles, they pass
the message to one
Marc Perkel wrote:
Got a strange problem with my home server. If I run bash from the
command line it sits there and does nothing. Bit if I run sh it works.
And sp is a symlink point to bash.
Anyone know what causes this?
The bash man page might be instructive here. Search for /\bsh\b/.
-
John Burnham wrote:
If you have both servers up and running at the same time, you could simply
change the
config on the old one to only have a manualroute router sending everything to
the new
server and do a forced queue run (exim -qff).
This is what I'd recommend, too; that way you're
ROGERS Richard wrote:
Alternatively - or additionally - for client side filtering, you can
always use a more obviously site-specific header, e.g.
add_header = X-MyOrganisation-Spam-Score: $spam_score
($spam_bar)
That's what I do as well, but you should always use
Keith Edmunds wrote:
I want to write an ACL condition that will accept mail if one of three
conditions is true. I can create the actual conditions, but I'm having
problems with the syntax of the or operator. To test this, I have an ACL
as follows:
accept domains = +relay_to_domains
Wil wrote:
Not the way they are supposed to. Alot of the true localhost activity is
getting blocked which shouldn't for starters. Am I missing something on the
syntax?
You're going to have to ask more specific questions about what you want
to accomplish, and how it's failing, if we're going
Philip Hazel wrote:
Just so you all know: this is my last day at work before retiring. I am
about to unsubscribe from the exim-users list. However, I will stay on
the exim-dev list for the moment and I am continuing to maintain PCRE.
It's been fun interacting with all you over the years!
Simon Hobbs wrote:
Here are some relevant log file messages:
2007-08-26 14:00:59 H=lsvsm-m01.elist.aol.com [64.12.187.199] sender
verify fail for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: response
to RCPT
TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] from
listserv.aol.com [152.163.210.183] was: 550 5.1.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Steen Eugen Poulsen wrote:
The problem is at my end, I had forgotten that reply goes to the
poster and not the list here.
wtb: respond to list support in thunderbird, independent of whatever the
list has a reply-to: list. :p
How much will you offer me?
ikearns wrote:
Hi John
I can confirm that the alias is already there
security: root
hostmaster: root
info: postmaster
marketing: postmaster
sales: postmaster
support:postmaster
# trap decode to catch security attacks
decode: root
Peter Bowyer wrote:
And the rest didn't even comprehend the question.
Your evidence for this is what? It's unspoken etiquette on this list
that once someone has engaged with a problem, it's generally left to
that person to continue with it.
I'm only seeing your half of this conversation,
Marcin Krol wrote:
Hello everyone,
Following string expansion works:
${if
eq{${lookup{da7.promo.pl}lsearch*{/etc/virtual/domainowners}{$value}}}{}
{remote}{local}}
local
${if
eq{${lookup{not.local.domain}lsearch*{/etc/virtual/domainowners}{$value}}}{}
{remote}{local}}
remote
Luca Bertoncello wrote:
Hi, list!
Today have I a very strange problem...
I use monit to monitor my server and it sends sometimes some E-Mails to me,
to advice, for example, that a daemon's PID changed (restart) and so on...
Since today, if SpamAssassin (3.2.2) is started, I see this
Thomas Jacob wrote:
The following ACL clause causes an error
accept condition = ${if and { {!def:h_STUFF} \
{eq {$h_From:} [EMAIL PROTECTED] } {true}{false} }
temporarily rejected after DATA: failed to expand ACL string ${if and
{{!def:h_STUFF} {eq {$h_From:} [EMAIL
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
All the mailing list archives (back to 1996) have been converted into
lurker, which should be easier to use to find things. Message URLs
within lurker are stable so can be quoted in emails, wiki pages etc.
Looks good! However, on
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
All the services on exim.org have now been moved from
sesame.csx.cam.ac.uk to tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk
Did you actually grind up the old machine to make the new one? :)
- Marc
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
Robby Balona wrote:
I have Exim purring away and doing well and Spamasassin seems to work nicely
to. I would like to drop or quarantine mails marked as spam by Spamasassin .
I know all the arguments about doing this but I would like to block the spam
never the less.
Magnus has already put
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
- Reject the spam in the SMTP conversation, but deliver it to the quarantine
as well (fakereject). This may be an option in the range between almost
certainly spam (i.e. really reject) and maybe spam (mark and deliver or
quarantine). But it may also be completely
Ian Eiloart wrote:
No, please do obfuscate addresses in the archives.
Alternatively, remove any posts with my email address, and never expect to
hear from me again.
Don't you think that's a bit extreme, given this?
http://www.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Obfuscation is a losing battle.
Marc Perkel wrote:
The email was submitted with Thunderbird. I wonder if the problem is
thunderbird related. The bsmtp question is unrelated. I'm using that to
do automated virus reports.
As Graeme pointed out, and I pointed out to you in April as well, the
problem is with your server,
Toralf Lund wrote:
Still working on my warning header update...
I've been wondering, is there any nice and built-in way to say add
warning and accept, or if you like accept with warning, in an ACL
statement? I mean, can I tell the ACL to return accept directly
rather than continue
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm using a different failover system. I have a main server on the low
mx and several backup servers on the next highest mx.
dummy0.junkemailfilter.com - 10 - semi-dead IP
mx.junkemailfilter.com - 20 - main server
mx.junkemailfilter.net - 30 - multiple backup servers
[I changed the subject because this is not a continuation of the part of
the thread that was getting acrimonious]
Jeremy Harris wrote:
Without knowing for sure what mails are spam and what are ham,
we reject connections:
10% rdns + 2mx
35% helo
5% dnsbl
20% conn-dropped
Chris Meadors wrote:
It seems to work for the pathological case of the Japan's TLD which
until a couple years ago would have always been a two, but now
optionally can be a one.
Both mazda.jp and mazda.co.jp return the expected results.
It fails for www.orgforms.gov.on.ca -- it should
Ted Cooper wrote:
gascione wrote:
I have the following ACL integrating spamassassin into my exim gateways.
I believe it is inefficient because I believe it is sending the message
to be evaluated by spamassassin many times. Am I correct and if so how
should I construct the logic to achieve the
David S. Madole wrote:
I do an extensive amount of message processing based on database
content, and one thing that works well for me is to have a dummy
router early in the chain that does the database lookup and populates
$address_data with everything that will be needed later, with the
Thomas Hochstein wrote:
Marc Perkel schrieb:
One thing that spammers can't spoof is RDNS.
That is plain wrong. Most probably don't control the rDNS entries for
their IP space, but it is far from impossible.
So if the RNDS of an IP is
xxx.xxx.amd.com then we know the email is ham.
Mike Cardwell wrote:
To further expand on this. It appears that this technique does not
bypass their filters, but gives the message a much higher likelyhood
of passing them only. I noticed this when trying to send an email with a
.exe attachment to a hotmail account, which was silently
Mike Cardwell wrote:
To further expand on this. It appears that this technique does not
bypass their filters, but gives the message a much higher likelyhood
of passing them only. I noticed this when trying to send an email with a
.exe attachment to a hotmail account, which was silently
Mike Cardwell wrote:
I've found a way around their stupid filters. Well, it works for me
anyway. Just before the dnslookup router create another router:
This adds lots of large headers to the email message which seems to
push the message size above a limit somewhere around 50KB at which
Thomas Jacob wrote:
C) the $sender_host_address can be reverse-resolved to the HELO string
(PTR record lookup)
A, B work as intended, but C somehow does not (at least not if the PTR
record resolves to a name that has no A/CNAME entry itself, or the name
does but points to a different IP)
Thomas Jacob wrote:
matches the host name that Exim obtains by doing a reverse lookup of
the calling host address
so basically a reverse lookup has to be read as
reverse lookup/lookup-again using Exim's host_lookup technique? Hmm.
Yes. That's the meaning of reverse lookup everywhere it
1 - 100 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
