.
Is there a tutorial on accomplishing this in terms of the necessary
Exim configuration entries? Otherwaise, can someone give me some ideas
on how to proceed?
Thank you for your time,
--
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http
Thank you all very much. I will take these suggestions and proceed.
Best regards,
Mark
On 11/7/06, Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Mark wrote:
> > I am interested in learning how to use an Exim server as a backup for
> > multiple separate domains. My
th because it didn't advertise AUTH? Or, more
accurately, have it not mind getting the second EHLO? after the client gave
it the first one?
Sendmail doesn't seem to mind this behavior at all. But that's neither here
nor there.
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman
Holy cripes! How did I miss that?
Probably in trying to sort out where in the process things should be done,
and not even considering a simple configuration directive.
Rafal - thank you.
On 4/29/07, RafaĆ Kupka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 07:28:38AM -0700
smtp_connect to
defer when the load goes over e.g. 4.
defer
condition = ${if >{$load_average}{4000} {true}{false}}
message = Service temporarily unavailable, try again later.
Regards,
Mark.
> I currently have an option that only queues messages instead of delivering
> them immedia
ing (120 rcpt_to / 60 second period).
As far as I understand most/all the zombies have their own smtp senders,
which are cut down and don't handle anything other than "yes I accept"
particularly gracefully (hence the reason why greylisting currently
works).
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTE
.
It could be a message_size limitation. Either way have the users
provided actual error messages / bounces to make identifying the actual
problem easier rather than random guesswork.
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
mmediate
> delivery?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paulo
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
>
>
>
--
Ma
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 22:25 +0100, Mark Smith wrote:
> > You could try something like this:
> >
> > deny
> > authenticated = *
> > !senders = $authenticated_id
> > message = Aliases not allowed
> >
> > However, a problem with Outlook
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 12:04 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Can you suggest an POP/IMAP proxy
Perdition.
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this li
t; $USER will increase and I do not like to put 1.000.000 $USER
> or more in the Hand of an external ISP.
That's really a choice you'll have to make. If you setup and manage the
services yourself then you've got the absolute control but you're also
responsible for making it w
I'm thinking about moving some of the smtp_* resource controls into an
acl specifically smtp_accept_max_per_host. I've had a quick look and
can't find if the information I'll need has been pushed into variables
accessible from the acls.
Anyone got any pointers ?
--
Ma
host a separate zones
> if necessary.
Alternatively alter the acls so that no sender / recipient checks are
done when the email originates from the local network.
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at htt
d have helped speed the
resolution of a problem.
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
uot;CacheFlow Server".
Under those conditions it would seem to be more sensible to bring the
ident lookup into an acl (is that possible?) and only test hosts on the
various dynamic IP lists.
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
I think it's best if we do some in person consultancy, preferably using
the "clue-by-four" attention grabbing method.
Oh, and if no one guessed
:)
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at ht
emove from the locally
rolled rpm now.
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
I've been looking for a way to do this for a while, is there a method by
which I can close the smtp port completely once the load on a box hits a
certain level?
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim deta
tain load levels.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:45 AM
> Subject: [exim] Getting exim to refuse connections
>
>
> > I've been looking for a way to do this for a while, is there
lt;--
I think the load monitoring script which plays with iptables is probably
going to be the way to go.
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
directly into the maildir from exim? Handing
off to another process to do the actual delivery? It might be possible
to get exim to log the filename it wrote to if the former, and if it's
not possible with the vanilla code then it will be possible to hack the
code to make it log.
--
Mark <
27;ve not seen this sort
of error before. Can anyone shed any light?
Mark
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
d just make exim dump or store
> > all emails that are in the que to just /var/spool/exim/input/ ?
Unless your machines are handling very little load I'd recommend keeping
the split_spool_directory directive and living with the queue being
split down into multiple directories (what'
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:52 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Is there any way to have multiple log files? I'd like to have a separate
> like file for each interface address.
Might be possible with a single daemon if pushing out to syslog and
using syslog-ng
--
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
e SMTP server is
broken according to the RFC (RFC2821, section 4.2.1 to be
specific).
--
Mark Nippere-contacts:
832 Tanglewood Drive[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bryan, Texas 77802-4013 http://nipsy.bitgnome.net/
(9
which is running
> FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #0.
It was necessary to add -lutil on all my FreeBSD 4.11 and 6.1 systems before
it would compile, fwiw.
Mark
--
Mark Morley
Owner / Administrator
Islandnet.com
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
ere will fail
immediately even on a 4xx level message, but that is out of your
control.
--
Mark Nippere-contacts:
832 Tanglewood Drive[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bryan, Texas 77802-4013 http://nipsy.bitgnome.
Howdy. Forgive the possible RTFM-request but I've been looking up and down
ch11.html repeatedly and haven't found what I'm looking for.
Is there an operator that allows you to encrypt data, but with something
reversible (i.e. not md5 hash, but rather des or aes or something similar)?
I could alwa
Just thought I'd pass this along in case anyone was having a similar issue
with gmail or for some other domain.
When my servers were bouncing messages to gmail.com addresses and had any
SpamAssassin headers, gmail was truncating the message from that line
downward. So the bounce message would end
Add 'return_path_on_delivery' to your 'log_selector' line -- or if you don't
have one already, add a line like:
log_selector = +return_path_on_delivery
to the main section of the config file. See 48.15 in:
http://exim.org/exim-html-4.61/doc/html/spec_html/ch48.html#SECTlogselector
On 5/5/06, D
assistance would be appreciated.
Also, I had postfix installed with which I could view my mail with Pine
on the server but now I cannot. Are there any settings that I need to
change regarding default mail box delivery?
Thanks in advance
mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman
Thanks for teh reply
I am still looking to locate the default location for my mails so that I
can configure pine etc to use them.
Where can I configre this?
Mark
Tony Finch wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote:
>
>> I am new to exim and am looking for the best
own subnet and work subnet.
Any advice would be appreciated
Ta
Steven Wayne wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:36:49PM +0100, Mark Menzies wrote:
>
>> Thanks for teh reply
>>
>> I am still looking to locate the default location for my mails so that I
>> can
server, I can access the mail and even send mail over
command line from ANY host. Mail is accepted and delivered fine.
Is there another setting I need to configure along with the
relay_from_hosts? Is this in any way related to the acl_check_rcpt
settings too?
Thanks in advance
Mark
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Tuesday 23 May 2006 22:57 Mark Menzies wrote:
>
>> I have the following set in my config:
>>
>> hostlist relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : x.x.x.160/29
>>
>> with the subnet belonging to me. I am led to believe that this is the
>
Tony Finch wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote:
>
>> When I start my server, I can access the mail
>>
>
> What kind of "access"? And what do you mean by "the mail"?
>
>
>> and even send mail over command line from AN
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Wednesday 24 May 2006 19:27 skrev Mark Menzies:
>
>> Yes I can telnet onto my server on port 25 from any host and send
>> mail!!! This is why I am concerned. I also have another issue with
>> iptables that says it is blocking port 25 from
Tony Finch wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote:
>
>
>> The only parts of the config I have edited are the domain I want to host
>> and the relay_from_hosts setting.
>>
>
> What is your relay_from_hosts setting?
>
>
> Tony.
>
ho
add_header = X-GeoIP-Country: ${extract {3} {|} {$GEOIP}}
... and so on
Key to this is a small daemon that I wrote that listens for input on the socket,
performs the GeoIP lookup, and returns the results. This is a single little C
file that needs to be compiled and linked against the GeoIP libr
Rainer Sigl wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would like to save the content of $local_part into another variable
> that I can use the orignal value later. How to do this?
>
> my configuration is:
>
> lists:
> driver = redirect
> # allow_fail
> local_save=$local_part ?
time at least) but can't help
wonder if we really need this thread again - it's not like you listened
to people's comments the last time, and seemingly haven't since.
- Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
>
> We have around 7500 mailboxes currently. We handle around 80 000 mails
> daily
> to those mailboxes. We have a greylist solution in Exim that works with a
> MySQL database backend and we make use of DNSBL lists. All our servers are
> running FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x
>
While I don't disagree with th
ddress that looks
like a list but in another domain from being delivered to the list.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim
vs.
MAILMAN_domains. The documentation shows this all lower case. I don't
know if that is significant or not, but it may be.
Also, you don't indicate whether or not you have server.windfinder.com
and news.server.windfinder.com in local_domains. If not, I think this
is the cause of your
lling mailman_router router
>mailman_router router called for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> domain = server.windfinder.com
>set transport mailman_transport
>queued for mailman_transport transport: local_part = news
>domain = server.windfinder.com
> errors_to=NULL
> domain_data=NULL localpa
istmacrodefs as 213.185.*.*
When I test with exim -bh I get the 'relay not permitted' message.
Should it be defined as 213.185.0.0/16?
Am I doing this completely wrong or is there something small missing?
Any help greatly appreciated.
exim4-daemon-heavy 4.62-4
Thanks,
Mark
--
## List detai
Thanks to both who replied, This is now working as desired.
No I definatly do not want to allow the relaying but unfortunatly have
to for a temporary period in order to support an old phone (that will be
upgraded)
I made up the IP Range for the purpose of the post.
Thanks again,
Mark
On Thu
Thanks for informing me of this - i've read through the page.
Regards,
Mark
> Mark Adams wrote:
> >
> > I made up the IP Range for the purpose of the post.
>
> Please do not do that.
>
> http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/MailingListEtiquette#head-a6f7fb5c
.
Thanks,
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:25:53PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> Mark Adams wrote:
> > I was hoping to draw from the pool of experience that the exim mailing
> > list has, as I realise this is a spamassassin or other issue. We are
> > running exim4.62-4 with Spamassassin
et iostats on a specific process?
Thanks for your help
Mark
>
> --
> ``It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.''
> (Chic Murray)
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
s this
also mean all spam mail goes into a honeypot rather than completely rejecting
obvious spam?
>From my experience, scanning at SMTP-time thus has a load on CPU, other people
> may differ on the same.
>
> rgds,
> Joseph
Thanks,
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.
It seems nigh on the impossible to find a straightforward explaination of
installing MailMan and having it work with Exim (OS is Fedora). Can anybody
help? I am do sick of reading about UID/GIDs, transports and directors and
getting nowhere. All I want is a mailing list!
Regards
Mark
--
## List
router is responsible, it
will pass through further along the routers, therefore allowing the
second, third etc etc routers until it matches one that is not unseen.
Please post the routers you are using.
> What do I have to write so that both routers are completely processed in
> a
ake sure all routers are processed (all other
routers set us unseen)
>
> Regards
> Marten
>
Cheers,
Mark
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.
livery:
debug_print = "T: shadow transport"
driver = appendfile
file = /dev/null
Of course this will mean no messages will bounce. Correct messages will
be caught by correct routers, everything else will fall into the ether..
> > Regards
> > Marten
> >
Cheers,
Ma
lookup
T=remote_smtp H=mx1.hotmail.com [65.54.245.8]
2006-11-17 09:51:24 1Gl0NX-0004w8-3W Completed
But the message never arrives in the hotmail acct, I'm hoping a little more
log detail will glean the reason.
All other TLD's are fine.
Best
Mark
---
Mark Bell
http://m4rk.biz
tel
Thanks, that was my suspicion.
Although now not relevant to *this* issue, the initial post still stands - I
would like to know how to increase the level of detail in the 'mainlog',
just FMI.
Can you direct me to a good tutorial/howto/wiki ?
Best
Mark
> It does not go into reci
Thank you all very much for your help.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
com [65.54.244.104]
2006-11-17 20:02:55 1Gl9vJ-0005F8-Kf Completed
What am I missing to get that extra info in the log?
Cheers,
Mark
> I'm not so sure.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki wit
ally clear ;)
Cheers,
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
What would you folk recommend as a good POP3 partner for exim4 ?
---
Mark Bell
http://m4rk.biz
tel: 08701 996969
mob: 07740 861862
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http
ring and text analysis. Besides which,
SquirrelMail has multiple plugins to manage the SQL side of
SpamAssassin at this point while DSPAM uses its own web interface
for this.
Thanks for any help. As always, I try to explain things
as well as possible. But let me know if I can add anythi
uggestion.
Thanks for the information. I will go about doing this a
different way then.
--
Mark Nippere-contacts:
4320 Milam Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bryan, Texas 77801-3920 http://nipsy.b
Hello,
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 21:18, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Mark Symonds wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Apparently, sender callouts are a "bug".
>
> IIRC callouts were originally introduced to enable people to verify
> users on their own servers. An ex
Apologies if I missed a documented answer for this when I was looking from
the spec and google.
I'm curious if anyone has had any experience using MySQL stored procedures
with Exim? Specifically, is there any way to get to use the "CALL
ProcName()" syntax in lookups without having to change the la
access, you can use this variable to include
information about the verification failure.
--
Mark Nippere-contacts:
4320 Milam Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bryan, Texas 77801-3920 http://nipsy.bitgno
You might try the "HIGH" option to see if anything
changes on Opera's side. Otherwise, you will probably have to be
more specific and select from the exact cipher suites listed
below the more generic lists.
--
Mark Nippere-contacts:
4
ts
everything through! Could someone please point me in the right
direction?
Thanks
Mark Douglas
--
__
Postmaster and System Administrator
Network Section
IT Department
School of Oriental and African Studies
University of London
Thornhaugh Street
London
WC1H 0XG
--
## List de
On 11/24/06, Mark Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Apologies if I missed a documented answer for this when I was looking from
> the spec and google.
>
> I'm curious if anyone has had any experience using MySQL stored procedures
> with Exim? Specifically, is th
On 2/3/07, Mike Cardwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When stored procedures didn't work for me, I used stored functions
> instead. Of course, with stored functions, you can only return a single
> element, but you can return stuff like:
>
> "foo1=bar1\nfoo2=bar2"
>
> Then pull data out of it usin
On 2/22/07, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 08 February 2007 19:08, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Hello everybody! This is my vision of and suggestion for a reform of the
> > string expansion language:
>
Just throwing this suggestion in since you mentioned variables. It'd
Hi,
I have been looking around the net to try find how exactly exiscan
scores compare with spamd scores. is it just x10 as it seems to be?
Any help, or links to advice would be very much appreciated.
Regards,
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim
, one with just local_parts instead
of $local_parts. but they all seem to get bypassed and a 'DENIED: No
such user" logged. All mail that has a user in the pgdb works fine.
help appreciated
Regards,
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
route the
> recipient.
>
Thanks, This worked as desired.
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
bout both
Exim and Postfix speak to this? Would something like the following
be a better construction:
instance=$sender_host_address.$sender_helo_name.$message_exim_id\n\n
I know this is a pretty obscure question, but I want to get this
right so I don't have to think about it any mo
Hi all. We've been working with a new commercial spam filter. It's sitting
on the edge in front of our Exim (4.66 - haven't gotten around to upgrading
-- running on Debian Sarge on Dell 750/850's) boxes. I'm seeing an odd
thing: Exim is queueing incoming messages from the spam filter box due to
hig
Can anyone tell me what the YY, YN etc next to the email address mean? Is it
described in the documentation?
1DWXBj-0007wP-G5-H
root 0 0
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1115979275 0
-helo_name client06
-host_address XX.
-host_name
-interface_address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
-received_protocol esmtp
oesn't the first router produce the
same error?
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
server has its own local copy of SA running.
- Messages are scanned by one virus scanner at a minimum, and
possibly as many as *three* depending on current server load.
(and yes, some scanners catch things that the other do not).
Works a treat for us, never have any significant load i
Are there any *valid* reasons for a mailserver's HELO greeting not matching
the hostname obtained from rDNS?
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jakob Hirsch
> Sent: 20 May 2005 15:59
> To: 'Exim-users'
> Subject: Re: [exim] Bogus HELOs
>
> Mark Smith wrote:
>
> > Are there any *valid* r
el,
> exim was switched from using /etc/exim.conf to
> /usr/local/etc/exim/configure
>
I've never seen that before. What OS and version of cPanel are you using?
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
om a
> certain user and deliver it to a different address to that
> originally specified?
> Pointers to documentation gratefully received as I can't spot it :-(
>
Add a router like this:
my_redirect:
driver = redirect
domains = +local_domains
senders = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dat
lieve
that this version will really make a difference :-) I'm just doing it
for the sake of completeness.
Cheers,
Mark.
--
Mark Lawrence
#!/usr/bin/perl
# --
# Copyright (C) 2005 Mark Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#
#
use port 465 to make things work.
Is there a way to have the old functionality using cyrus_sasl
authentication, or is this just a non-feature of cyrus-sasl?
Thanks!
--
Mark Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: +46704070332
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
;t
really pleasant on the user's end.
Thanks for any suggestions.
--
Mark Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: +46704070332
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
On May 30, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Marc Sherman wrote:
Mark Edwards wrote:
The only thing I dislike about this is that it takes a long time for
the process to complete, which requires the client to sit and wait
for the whole process. Can someone suggest a way to have exim queue
mail for the smart
differently than exim 4.34 perhaps?
--
Mark Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: +46704070332
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
On May 30, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Marc Sherman wrote:
Mark Edwards wrote:
The only thing I dislike about this is that it takes a long time for
the process to complete, which requires the client to sit and wait
for the whole process. Can someone suggest a way to have exim queue
mail for the smart
On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote:
Strangely, the exim mainlog doesn't even register the connection
attempt when
I don't specify port 465, and Outlook Express times out with a
"Connection
failed" message.
So
this directly. Is there something else to adding a smart router?
Thanks!
--
Mark Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: +46704070332
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:30 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote:
I figured it out. I am currently in Stockholm, and the servers in
question
are in San Francisco. The ISP's here (I've tried two now) apparently
are
blocking outgoing port 25,
This is wh
On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote:
I know it doesn't seem right, I agree, but simply adding the smart
router adds
a significant delay on the client end. I have observed this
directly. Is
On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote:
I know it doesn't seem right, I agree, but simply adding the smart
router adds
a significant delay on the client end. I have observed this
directly. Is
On Jun 2, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote:
I think I solved the root of the problem, which was that I had simply
added
the smarthost router to the head of the configure file, and left the
default
dnslookup router. I removed the dnslookup router
> Hi, I use similar order on the ACL's and just 2 weeks ago I
> moved the RBL checks to the "connect" ACL instead of the
> "RCPT" ACL. This little change, speed up my servers and
> reduce the load from 3 to 0.5
>
> After thinking about it, is obvius that if we filter by IP,
> i.e. using RBL, w
some way of checking the envelope sender at connect
time, I'd be very interested to hear it.
Mark
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
the
> mail to, not my own server. I tried to check the ip in the
> rbl server listed, but that server name isn't listed in my dns server.
>
No, the 550 message is from x.ac.uk, telling you it's rejecting your
mail because your server is listed in the RBL.
Mark
--
> > > I'm assuming you're mistaken -- there must be a way to whitelist
> > > against RBL checks no matter where in the transaction the
> check is done.
> >
> > If you've come up with some way of checking the envelope sender at
> > connect time, I'd be very interested to hear it.
>
> RBLs aren'
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo