[exim] Using Exim as Backup Mail server

. Is there a tutorial on accomplishing this in terms of the necessary Exim configuration entries? Otherwaise, can someone give me some ideas on how to proceed? Thank you for your time, -- Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http

Re: [exim] Using Exim as Backup Mail server

Thank you all very much. I will take these suggestions and proceed. Best regards, Mark On 11/7/06, Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mark wrote: > > I am interested in learning how to use an Exim server as a backup for > > multiple separate domains. My

[exim] Exim4 EHLO/STARTTLS/AUTH and buggy client

th because it didn't advertise AUTH? Or, more accurately, have it not mind getting the second EHLO? after the client gave it the first one? Sendmail doesn't seem to mind this behavior at all. But that's neither here nor there. Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman

Re: [exim] Exim4 EHLO/STARTTLS/AUTH and buggy client

Holy cripes! How did I miss that? Probably in trying to sort out where in the process things should be done, and not even considering a simple configuration directive. Rafal - thank you. On 4/29/07, Rafał Kupka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 07:28:38AM -0700

Re: [exim] connection defer depending on load average

smtp_connect to defer when the load goes over e.g. 4. defer condition = ${if >{$load_average}{4000} {true}{false}} message = Service temporarily unavailable, try again later. Regards, Mark. > I currently have an option that only queues messages instead of delivering > them immedia

Re: how does typical zombie work? (was Re: [exim] Rate Limiting? )

ing (120 rcpt_to / 60 second period). As far as I understand most/all the zombies have their own smtp senders, which are cut down and don't handle anything other than "yes I accept" particularly gracefully (hence the reason why greylisting currently works). -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [exim] microsoft excel files!

. It could be a message_size limitation. Either way have the users provided actual error messages / bounces to make identifying the actual problem easier rather than random guesswork. -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ##

Re: [exim] Queue and Load

mmediate > delivery? > > > Regards, > > Paulo > -- > ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/ > > > -- Ma

RE: [exim] Way to Prevent Spoofed Internal Addresses?

On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 22:25 +0100, Mark Smith wrote: > > You could try something like this: > > > > deny > > authenticated = * > > !senders = $authenticated_id > > message = Aliases not allowed > > > > However, a problem with Outlook

Re: [exim] Re: exim and multiple Mailbox-Server

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 12:04 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Can you suggest an POP/IMAP proxy Perdition. -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this li

Re: [exim] Re: Re: exim and multiple Mailbox-Server

t; $USER will increase and I do not like to put 1.000.000 $USER > or more in the Hand of an external ISP. That's really a choice you'll have to make. If you setup and manage the services yourself then you've got the absolute control but you're also responsible for making it w

[exim] smtp_* limits in ACLs?

I'm thinking about moving some of the smtp_* resource controls into an acl specifically smtp_accept_max_per_host. I've had a quick look and can't find if the information I'll need has been pushed into variables accessible from the acls. Anyone got any pointers ? -- Ma

RE: [exim] Accept messages while offline

host a separate zones > if necessary. Alternatively alter the acls so that no sender / recipient checks are done when the email originates from the local network. -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at htt

Re: [exim] MessageLabs 554 SMTP synchronisation error

d have helped speed the resolution of a problem. -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] MessageLabs 554 SMTP synchronisation error

uot;CacheFlow Server". Under those conditions it would seem to be more sensible to bring the ident lookup into an acl (is that possible?) and only test hosts on the various dynamic IP lists. -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] Easy Disclaimers with Exim?

I think it's best if we do some in person consultancy, preferably using the "clue-by-four" attention grabbing method. Oh, and if no one guessed :) -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at ht

Re: [exim] Dovecot IMAP - Opinions?

emove from the locally rolled rpm now. -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

[exim] Getting exim to refuse connections

I've been looking for a way to do this for a while, is there a method by which I can close the smtp port completely once the load on a box hits a certain level? -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim deta

Re: [exim] Getting exim to refuse connections

tain load levels. > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:45 AM > Subject: [exim] Getting exim to refuse connections > > > > I've been looking for a way to do this for a while, is there

Re: [exim] Getting exim to refuse connections

lt;-- I think the load monitoring script which plays with iptables is probably going to be the way to go. -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] Problem with lost mails

directly into the maildir from exim? Handing off to another process to do the actual delivery? It might be possible to get exim to log the filename it wrote to if the former, and if it's not possible with the vanilla code then it will be possible to hack the code to make it log. -- Mark <

[exim] Weirdness with quota

27;ve not seen this sort of error before. Can anyone shed any light? Mark -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] mail que

d just make exim dump or store > > all emails that are in the que to just /var/spool/exim/input/ ? Unless your machines are handling very little load I'd recommend keeping the split_spool_directory directive and living with the queue being split down into multiple directories (what'

Re: [exim] Multiple Log Files

On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:52 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > Is there any way to have multiple log files? I'd like to have a separate > like file for each interface address. Might be possible with a single daemon if pushing out to syslog and using syslog-ng -- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: [exim] Turning 421 errors into Defer?

e SMTP server is broken according to the RFC (RFC2821, section 4.2.1 to be specific). -- Mark Nippere-contacts: 832 Tanglewood Drive[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bryan, Texas 77802-4013 http://nipsy.bitgnome.net/ (9

Re: [exim] FreeBSD pipe_transport_setup build failure

which is running > FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #0. It was necessary to add -lutil on all my FreeBSD 4.11 and 6.1 systems before it would compile, fwiw. Mark -- Mark Morley Owner / Administrator Islandnet.com -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at

Re: [exim] 4xx or 5xx for notifying overquota condition?

ere will fail immediately even on a 4xx level message, but that is out of your control. -- Mark Nippere-contacts: 832 Tanglewood Drive[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bryan, Texas 77802-4013 http://nipsy.bitgnome.

[exim] Encrypt operator?

Howdy. Forgive the possible RTFM-request but I've been looking up and down ch11.html repeatedly and haven't found what I'm looking for. Is there an operator that allows you to encrypt data, but with something reversible (i.e. not md5 hash, but rather des or aes or something similar)? I could alwa

[exim] Exim+Spamassassin+Gmail issue

Just thought I'd pass this along in case anyone was having a similar issue with gmail or for some other domain. When my servers were bouncing messages to gmail.com addresses and had any SpamAssassin headers, gmail was truncating the message from that line downward. So the bounce message would end

Re: [exim] return_path in transport

Add 'return_path_on_delivery' to your 'log_selector' line -- or if you don't have one already, add a line like: log_selector = +return_path_on_delivery to the main section of the config file. See 48.15 in: http://exim.org/exim-html-4.61/doc/html/spec_html/ch48.html#SECTlogselector On 5/5/06, D

[exim] Basic Setup Assistance

assistance would be appreciated. Also, I had postfix installed with which I could view my mail with Pine on the server but now I cannot. Are there any settings that I need to change regarding default mail box delivery? Thanks in advance mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman

Re: [exim] Basic Setup Assistance

Thanks for teh reply I am still looking to locate the default location for my mails so that I can configure pine etc to use them. Where can I configre this? Mark Tony Finch wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote: > >> I am new to exim and am looking for the best

Re: [exim] Basic Setup Assistance

own subnet and work subnet. Any advice would be appreciated Ta Steven Wayne wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:36:49PM +0100, Mark Menzies wrote: > >> Thanks for teh reply >> >> I am still looking to locate the default location for my mails so that I >> can

[exim] relay_from_hosts help

server, I can access the mail and even send mail over command line from ANY host. Mail is accepted and delivered fine. Is there another setting I need to configure along with the relay_from_hosts? Is this in any way related to the acl_check_rcpt settings too? Thanks in advance Mark

Re: [exim] relay_from_hosts help

Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Tuesday 23 May 2006 22:57 Mark Menzies wrote: > >> I have the following set in my config: >> >> hostlist relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : x.x.x.160/29 >> >> with the subnet belonging to me. I am led to believe that this is the >

Re: [exim] relay_from_hosts help

Tony Finch wrote: > On Tue, 23 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote: > >> When I start my server, I can access the mail >> > > What kind of "access"? And what do you mean by "the mail"? > > >> and even send mail over command line from AN

Re: [exim] relay_from_hosts help

Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Wednesday 24 May 2006 19:27 skrev Mark Menzies: > >> Yes I can telnet onto my server on port 25 from any host and send >> mail!!! This is why I am concerned. I also have another issue with >> iptables that says it is blocking port 25 from

Re: [exim] relay_from_hosts help

Tony Finch wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2006, Mark Menzies wrote: > > >> The only parts of the config I have edited are the domain I want to host >> and the relay_from_hosts setting. >> > > What is your relay_from_hosts setting? > > > Tony. > ho

Re: [exim] Using GeoIP to block spammers - anyone?

add_header = X-GeoIP-Country: ${extract {3} {|} {$GEOIP}} ... and so on Key to this is a small daemon that I wrote that listens for input on the socket, performs the GeoIP lookup, and returns the results. This is a single little C file that needs to be compiled and linked against the GeoIP libr

Re: [exim] saving variables

Rainer Sigl wrote: > Hi all, > I would like to save the content of $local_part into another variable > that I can use the orignal value later. How to do this? > > my configuration is: > > lists: > driver = redirect > # allow_fail > local_save=$local_part ?

Re: [exim] Host Karma Database - white/yellow/black lists - looking for data

time at least) but can't help wonder if we really need this thread again - it's not like you listened to people's comments the last time, and seemingly haven't since. - Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] Mail Implementation Design

> > We have around 7500 mailboxes currently. We handle around 80 000 mails > daily > to those mailboxes. We have a greylist solution in Exim that works with a > MySQL database backend and we make use of DNSBL lists. All our servers are > running FreeBSD 5.x and 6.x > While I don't disagree with th

Re: [exim] [Mailman-Users] Mailman with exim4 on Debian Sarge

ddress that looks like a list but in another domain from being delivered to the list. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim

Re: [exim] [Mailman-Users] Mailman with exim4 on Debian Sarge

vs. MAILMAN_domains. The documentation shows this all lower case. I don't know if that is significant or not, but it may be. Also, you don't indicate whether or not you have server.windfinder.com and news.server.windfinder.com in local_domains. If not, I think this is the cause of your

Re: [exim] [Mailman-Users] Mailman with exim4 on Debian Sarge

lling mailman_router router >mailman_router router called for [EMAIL PROTECTED] > domain = server.windfinder.com >set transport mailman_transport >queued for mailman_transport transport: local_part = news >domain = server.windfinder.com > errors_to=NULL > domain_data=NULL localpa

[exim] Relaying for IP address range

istmacrodefs as 213.185.*.* When I test with exim -bh I get the 'relay not permitted' message. Should it be defined as 213.185.0.0/16? Am I doing this completely wrong or is there something small missing? Any help greatly appreciated. exim4-daemon-heavy 4.62-4 Thanks, Mark -- ## List detai

Re: [exim] Relaying for IP address range

Thanks to both who replied, This is now working as desired. No I definatly do not want to allow the relaying but unfortunatly have to for a temporary period in order to support an old phone (that will be upgraded) I made up the IP Range for the purpose of the post. Thanks again, Mark On Thu

Re: [exim] Relaying for IP address range

Thanks for informing me of this - i've read through the page. Regards, Mark > Mark Adams wrote: > > > > I made up the IP Range for the purpose of the post. > > Please do not do that. > > http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/MailingListEtiquette#head-a6f7fb5c

[exim] Spamassassin + Exim4 high IO Wait

. Thanks, Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] Spamassassin + Exim4 high IO Wait

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 01:25:53PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote: > Mark Adams wrote: > > I was hoping to draw from the pool of experience that the exim mailing > > list has, as I realise this is a spamassassin or other issue. We are > > running exim4.62-4 with Spamassassin

Re: [exim] Spamassassin + Exim4 high IO Wait

et iostats on a specific process? Thanks for your help Mark > > -- > ``It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.'' > (Chic Murray) -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] Spamassassin + Exim4 high IO Wait

s this also mean all spam mail goes into a honeypot rather than completely rejecting obvious spam? >From my experience, scanning at SMTP-time thus has a load on CPU, other people > may differ on the same. > > rgds, > Joseph Thanks, Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.

[exim] Installing mailman with Exim (Fedora) - how?

It seems nigh on the impossible to find a straightforward explaination of installing MailMan and having it work with Exim (OS is Fedora). Can anybody help? I am do sick of reading about UID/GIDs, transports and directors and getting nowhere. All I want is a mailing list! Regards Mark -- ## List

Re: [exim] problem of understanding of unseen, self=pass and more

router is responsible, it will pass through further along the routers, therefore allowing the second, third etc etc routers until it matches one that is not unseen. Please post the routers you are using. > What do I have to write so that both routers are completely processed in > a

Re: [exim] problem of understanding of unseen, self=pass and more

ake sure all routers are processed (all other routers set us unseen) > > Regards > Marten > Cheers, Mark > -- > ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.

Re: [exim] problem of understanding of unseen, self=pass and more

livery: debug_print = "T: shadow transport" driver = appendfile file = /dev/null Of course this will mean no messages will bounce. Correct messages will be caught by correct routers, everything else will fall into the ether.. > > Regards > > Marten > > Cheers, Ma

[exim] exim loggin

lookup T=remote_smtp H=mx1.hotmail.com [65.54.245.8] 2006-11-17 09:51:24 1Gl0NX-0004w8-3W Completed But the message never arrives in the hotmail acct, I'm hoping a little more log detail will glean the reason. All other TLD's are fine. Best Mark --- Mark Bell http://m4rk.biz tel

Re: [exim] exim loggin

Thanks, that was my suspicion. Although now not relevant to *this* issue, the initial post still stands - I would like to know how to increase the level of detail in the 'mainlog', just FMI. Can you direct me to a good tutorial/howto/wiki ? Best Mark > It does not go into reci

Re: [exim] exim loggin

Thank you all very much for your help. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] exim loggin

com [65.54.244.104] 2006-11-17 20:02:55 1Gl9vJ-0005F8-Kf Completed What am I missing to get that extra info in the log? Cheers, Mark > I'm not so sure. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki wit

Re: [exim] exim loggin

ally clear ;) Cheers, Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

[exim] POP3

What would you folk recommend as a good POP3 partner for exim4 ? --- Mark Bell http://m4rk.biz tel: 08701 996969 mob: 07740 861862 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http

[exim] expansion variables in spam condition with Exim 4.63

ring and text analysis. Besides which, SquirrelMail has multiple plugins to manage the SQL side of SpamAssassin at this point while DSPAM uses its own web interface for this. Thanks for any help. As always, I try to explain things as well as possible. But let me know if I can add anythi

Re: [exim] expansion variables in spam condition with Exim 4.63

uggestion. Thanks for the information. I will go about doing this a different way then. -- Mark Nippere-contacts: 4320 Milam Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bryan, Texas 77801-3920 http://nipsy.b

Re: [exim] Sender callbacks are a deliberate "bug"

Hello, On Tuesday 21 November 2006 21:18, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > Mark Symonds wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Apparently, sender callouts are a "bug". > > IIRC callouts were originally introduced to enable people to verify > users on their own servers. An ex

[exim] Using MySQL Stored Procedures in Exim

Apologies if I missed a documented answer for this when I was looking from the spec and google. I'm curious if anyone has had any experience using MySQL stored procedures with Exim? Specifically, is there any way to get to use the "CALL ProcName()" syntax in lookups without having to change the la

Re: [exim] Sender Verify

access, you can use this variable to include information about the verification failure. -- Mark Nippere-contacts: 4320 Milam Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bryan, Texas 77801-3920 http://nipsy.bitgno

Re: [exim] REPOST: Possible TLS weakness in Exim? (to be noticed with Opera and Exim 4.50 from Debian stable)

You might try the "HIGH" option to see if anything changes on Opera's side. Otherwise, you will probably have to be more specific and select from the exact cipher suites listed below the more generic lists. -- Mark Nippere-contacts: 4

[exim] Newbie MIME ACL question

ts everything through! Could someone please point me in the right direction? Thanks Mark Douglas -- __ Postmaster and System Administrator Network Section IT Department School of Oriental and African Studies University of London Thornhaugh Street London WC1H 0XG -- ## List de

Re: [exim] Using MySQL Stored Procedures in Exim

On 11/24/06, Mark Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apologies if I missed a documented answer for this when I was looking from > the spec and google. > > I'm curious if anyone has had any experience using MySQL stored procedures > with Exim? Specifically, is th

Re: [exim] Using MySQL Stored Procedures in Exim

On 2/3/07, Mike Cardwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When stored procedures didn't work for me, I used stored functions > instead. Of course, with stored functions, you can only return a single > element, but you can return stuff like: > > "foo1=bar1\nfoo2=bar2" > > Then pull data out of it usin

Re: [exim] Exim 5: suggestion for string expansions

On 2/22/07, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 08 February 2007 19:08, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > Hello everybody! This is my vision of and suggestion for a reform of the > > string expansion language: > Just throwing this suggestion in since you mentioned variables. It'd

[exim] Spamassassin + Exiscan

Hi, I have been looking around the net to try find how exactly exiscan scores compare with spamd scores. is it just x10 as it seems to be? Any help, or links to advice would be very much appreciated. Regards, Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim

[exim] Recipient verification at ACL - alias checking

, one with just local_parts instead of $local_parts. but they all seem to get bypassed and a 'DENIED: No such user" logged. All mail that has a user in the pgdb works fine. help appreciated Regards, Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users

Re: [exim] Recipient verification at ACL - alias checking

route the > recipient. > Thanks, This worked as desired. Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

[exim] Postfix policy server imitation

bout both Exim and Postfix speak to this? Would something like the following be a better construction: instance=$sender_host_address.$sender_helo_name.$message_exim_id\n\n I know this is a pretty obscure question, but I want to get this right so I don't have to think about it any mo

[exim] Load average not being looked at in long connections?

Hi all. We've been working with a new commercial spam filter. It's sitting on the edge in front of our Exim (4.66 - haven't gotten around to upgrading -- running on Debian Sarge on Dell 750/850's) boxes. I'm seeing an odd thing: Exim is queueing incoming messages from the spam filter box due to hig

[exim] Mail queue

Can anyone tell me what the YY, YN etc next to the email address mean? Is it described in the documentation? 1DWXBj-0007wP-G5-H root 0 0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1115979275 0 -helo_name client06 -host_address XX. -host_name -interface_address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX -received_protocol esmtp

[exim] Delivery to root

oesn't the first router produce the same error? Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

RE: [exim] Recommendation - Separate Servers? Cluster? Round Robin?

server has its own local copy of SA running. - Messages are scanned by one virus scanner at a minimum, and possibly as many as *three* depending on current server load. (and yes, some scanners catch things that the other do not). Works a treat for us, never have any significant load i

[exim] Bogus HELOs

Are there any *valid* reasons for a mailserver's HELO greeting not matching the hostname obtained from rDNS? Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

RE: [exim] Bogus HELOs

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jakob Hirsch > Sent: 20 May 2005 15:59 > To: 'Exim-users' > Subject: Re: [exim] Bogus HELOs > > Mark Smith wrote: > > > Are there any *valid* r

RE: [exim] OK, what am I doing wrong.

el, > exim was switched from using /etc/exim.conf to > /usr/local/etc/exim/configure > I've never seen that before. What OS and version of cPanel are you using? Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/

RE: [exim] Redirecting incoming mail

om a > certain user and deliver it to a different address to that > originally specified? > Pointers to documentation gratefully received as I can't spot it :-( > Add a router like this: my_redirect: driver = redirect domains = +local_domains senders = [EMAIL PROTECTED] dat

[exim] [announce][sa-exim] New Version of 'greylistclean'

lieve that this version will really make a difference :-) I'm just doing it for the sake of completeness. Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Lawrence #!/usr/bin/perl # -- # Copyright (C) 2005 Mark Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # #

[exim] tls-on-connect with cyrus_sasl

use port 465 to make things work. Is there a way to have the old functionality using cyrus_sasl authentication, or is this just a non-feature of cyrus-sasl? Thanks! -- Mark Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: +46704070332 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users

[exim] manualroute and queueing

;t really pleasant on the user's end. Thanks for any suggestions. -- Mark Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: +46704070332 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] manualroute and queueing

On May 30, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Marc Sherman wrote: Mark Edwards wrote: The only thing I dislike about this is that it takes a long time for the process to complete, which requires the client to sit and wait for the whole process. Can someone suggest a way to have exim queue mail for the smart

Re: [exim] tls-on-connect with cyrus_sasl

differently than exim 4.34 perhaps? -- Mark Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: +46704070332 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] manualroute and queueing

On May 30, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Marc Sherman wrote: Mark Edwards wrote: The only thing I dislike about this is that it takes a long time for the process to complete, which requires the client to sit and wait for the whole process. Can someone suggest a way to have exim queue mail for the smart

Re: [exim] tls-on-connect with cyrus_sasl

On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Tony Finch wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote: Strangely, the exim mainlog doesn't even register the connection attempt when I don't specify port 465, and Outlook Express times out with a "Connection failed" message. So

Re: [exim] manualroute and queueing

this directly. Is there something else to adding a smart router? Thanks! -- Mark Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: +46704070332 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] tls-on-connect with cyrus_sasl

On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:30 PM, Tony Finch wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote: I figured it out. I am currently in Stockholm, and the servers in question are in San Francisco. The ISP's here (I've tried two now) apparently are blocking outgoing port 25, This is wh

Re: [exim] manualroute and queueing

On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Tony Finch wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Philip Hazel wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote: I know it doesn't seem right, I agree, but simply adding the smart router adds a significant delay on the client end. I have observed this directly. Is

Re: [exim] manualroute and queueing

On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Tony Finch wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Philip Hazel wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote: I know it doesn't seem right, I agree, but simply adding the smart router adds a significant delay on the client end. I have observed this directly. Is

Re: [exim] manualroute and queueing

On Jun 2, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Philip Hazel wrote: On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Mark Edwards wrote: I think I solved the root of the problem, which was that I had simply added the smarthost router to the head of the configure file, and left the default dnslookup router. I removed the dnslookup router

RE: [exim] Reducing load vs seeing all the spam

> Hi, I use similar order on the ACL's and just 2 weeks ago I > moved the RBL checks to the "connect" ACL instead of the > "RCPT" ACL. This little change, speed up my servers and > reduce the load from 3 to 0.5 > > After thinking about it, is obvius that if we filter by IP, > i.e. using RBL, w

RE: [exim] Reducing load vs seeing all the spam

some way of checking the envelope sender at connect time, I'd be very interested to hear it. Mark -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

RE: [exim] Re: Stopping DNSBL lookups, exim4.5, debian sarge

the > mail to, not my own server. I tried to check the ip in the > rbl server listed, but that server name isn't listed in my dns server. > No, the 550 message is from x.ac.uk, telling you it's rejecting your mail because your server is listed in the RBL. Mark --

RE: [exim] Reducing load vs seeing all the spam

> > > I'm assuming you're mistaken -- there must be a way to whitelist > > > against RBL checks no matter where in the transaction the > check is done. > > > > If you've come up with some way of checking the envelope sender at > > connect time, I'd be very interested to hear it. > > RBLs aren'

  1   2   3   >