Odhiambo Washington writes
> Using this very same router and transport, I am a little surprised that I
> still did get a hit on the taint issue:
I will set Odhiambo my complete configuration.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users writes
> Thomas and I are going to take this offline for a while.
Well not that long of a while. Andrew has come up with a
router and a transporter that I have tested to work on
a separate installation.
mailman_router:
driver = accept
local_par
Kirill Miazine via Exim-users writes
> Again, if my memory serves me right,
It serves you right!
root@siche ~ # /usr/lib/mailman/bin/genaliases
output is stances like
## nep-fle mailing list
nep-fle: "|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post nep-fle"
nep-fle-admin:"|/var
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes
> Getting a file out of Mailman to verify recipient names against would be
> ideal.
At Mailman list signup, names are optional. Most of my users don't give a
name.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users writes
>
> Argh. Still wrong.
> Is
> ${sg{sg{$MM_LISTCHK}{\/config.pck$}{}}{.*\/}{}}
> a better replacement for $local_part ?
Thank you so much!
I have a test installation now. If any wants to use it to figure
out the right transporter, contact me
Kirill Miazine via Exim-users writes
> > What more to check?
>
> you could make a wrapper, e.g. like this:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=exim-users&m=165650068118956&w=2
Thank you. I'm not au fait with this, so as a quick
fix, I downgraded to 4.95, since I need to keep my service
running.
Hi gang!
I've been running Mailman with exim4 for about 20 years now!
Yesterday, I upgraded my Debian to exim 4.96-3. Then I got hit by
this mailman problem. Log entry
| 2022-07-20 11:43:44 1oE87D-007hOf-2N ** nep-technici...@lists.openlib.org
| R=mailman_router T=mailman_transport: Tai
Andreas Metzler via Exim-users writes
> sa-exim probably has reached EOL.
I'm pleased to report that it works again. sa-exim (4.2.1-17)
is available on Debian testing, and there is a changelog
entry from Magnus. Version 4.92-6 of exim4-daemon-heavy,
that you made has the local_scan re
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users writes
> A quick web search
Thank you for this!
I certainly tried to search the web many times for this problem
but I could not find a reason, let alone a fix. My problem
is that I'm not an email professional who only deals with these
issues day in and
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users writes
> On 11/06/2019 05:12, Thomas Krichel via Exim-users wrote:
> > I have an issue that has a similar feel to it. It's with a host of
> > Germanic providers gmx.de, gmx.at, web.de, mailbox.org ...
> >
> > 2019-03-25 09:00:
Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users writes
> The gmx.de MTAs support DANE in both directions. Does your MX host
> have published DANE TLSA records? Are they correct? Is your
> certificate still valid, or expired? ...
I have an issue that has a similar feel to it. It's with a host of
Germanic
Andreas Metzler via Exim-users writes
> sa-exim probably has reached EOL.
But is there a pure-exim way to save all the incoming mails that
are rejected? That's what the main advantage is.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
Hi gang from sunny Novosibirsk!
I'm a user of exim on Debian for donkey's years. And for most of
them I have been using Marc Merlin's sa-exim with exim, to work with
spamassassin. Sa-exim saves the rejected mail. It implements greylisting
and tarpitting for me. sa-exim still in the D
Marc MERLIN via Exim-users writes
> 2 things you can try
>
> 1) /usr/sbin/exim4 -bd -d+all
> and check the logs to see what happens and whether local_scan gets run.
Done. The result is in
http://openlib.org/home/krichel/exim.txt
Spoiler alert: it does not mention local_scan
krichel@trab
14 matches
Mail list logo
